6-Attachment D ScoreSheet WellnessProgram.xls

XLS spreadsheet 33 KB Posted

Attached to
Officer Wellness Program
Solicitation number
TR27-100
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and the Office of the Utah Attorney General for an Officer Wellness Program. The contract is intended as a five-year professional services engagement to provide mental health support and wellness services to the Attorney General's Office. The vendor selection process requires submission of qualifications only, with pricing to be negotiated separately with the highest-ranked vendor. The evaluation will be based on technical criteria scored on a zero-to-five scale, with points distributed across six primary evaluation categories: Statement of the Problem (10%), Impact/Outcomes and Evaluation (14.3%), Goals/Objectives (14.3%), Project/Program Design and Implementation (21.4%), Capabilities/Competencies and Key Staff (21.4%), and Experience Working with Law Enforcement and Trauma/Child Abuse/Sex Abuse (21.4%), totaling 700 possible points across the technical evaluation.

All vendors must meet four mandatory requirements to be considered: hold licensure as a Licensed Clinical Mental Health Counselor (LCMHC), Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW), or equivalent credential; maintain active licensure in the State of Utah; demonstrate documented experience working in child sex abuse and trauma; and be an outside resource rather than a State of Utah employee, ensuring confidentiality and removing barriers to open communication. If the highest-ranked vendor cannot reach agreement on fair and reasonable compensation and contract terms, the state may proceed with negotiations with the next highest-ranked vendor. No pricing information should be included in the qualification submissions.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Wellness Program
EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
All offerors must meet the following criteria.
1.Licensed Clinical Mental Health Counselor (LCMHC), Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW), or equivalent
2.Licensed in the State of Utah
3.Experience working in child sex abuse and trauma
4.Mental Health Provider should be an outside resource, not a State of Utah employee. This ensures confidentiality and helps remove barriers to open communication.
Scoreable Technical CriteriaEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints

Earned

1Statement of the Problem107.1%50.000.00
2Impact/Outcomes and Evaluation2014.3%100.000.00
3Goals/Objectives2014.3%100.000.00
4Project/Program Design and Implementation3021.4%150.000.00
5Capabilities/Competencies -Key Staff3021.4%150.000.00
6Experience working with law enforcement and trauma, child abuse and sex abuse3021.4%150.000.00
130.0%0.000.00
140.0%0.000.00
150.0%0.000.00
160.0%0.000.00
170.0%0.000.00
180.0%0.000.00
190.0%0.000.00
200.0%0.000.00
210.0%0.000.00
220.0%0.000.00
230.0%0.000.00
100.0%700.000.00
Cost will be negotiated with the highest ranking vendor

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .