6-Attachment B - Proposal Scoring Form.pdf
PDF 137 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Eviction Advocacy Program
- Solicitation number
- BEZ26-00029663
- Issued by
- Dallas County, Texas
About this file
This is a Proposal Scoring Form developed by the City of Dallas Office of Housing and Community Empowerment for evaluation of applications to administer an Eviction Advocacy Program. The program seeks to establish a one-year agreement with one one-year renewal option to provide legal support and representation to Dallas residents facing eviction. The scoring form will be used to evaluate organizational capacity, program approach and work plan, evaluation methodology, and cost and budget considerations across a maximum of 100 points. Proposals will be assessed on the organization's history, experience, staffing qualifications, partnerships, prior City contract performance, program activities narrative, alignment with service scope and timeline requirements, client eligibility processes, outreach to target populations, and strategies to minimize participation barriers.
The evaluation plan assesses whether organizations have established measurable output and outcome metrics, appropriate data capture processes, staffing and systems to track and report metrics, and processes to document and verify client eligibility in accordance with City requirements. The cost evaluation examines program value relative to expected impact and clients reached, budget alignment with service caps and requirements, adequacy of budget narrative explanations, and the reasonableness of proposed costs to deliver outlined services. The scoring rubric distributes 30 points to organizational capacity and historic narrative, 30 points to approach and programming work plan, 20 points to evaluation plan, and 20 points to cost and budget, with the form revised as of January 21, 2026.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Revised: 1/21/26
Attachment B
CITY OF DALLAS
Office of Housing and Community Empowerment Project: Eviction Advocacy Program
Proposal Scoring Form
Name of Organization:
Name of Program:
REVIEWER: Please score the Proposal in each of the categories below. The maximum points available for each category and section are shown. Please fill in your score for each category/section and explain your point determination in the Comments section.
ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY & HISTORIC NARRATIVE EVALUATION
Did the organization submit all required documents as requested? 0
Based on the Organization’s History/Experience, does the Organization demonstrate a track record sufficient to undertake and support the program services outlined in the Proposal? Does the organization have the required minimum experience outlined in the solicitation?
Does the organization have experience serving the population they intend to serve? 5
Based on the Organization’s Qualifications/Staffing, does the Organization have the professional staff capacity with appropriate credentials to undertake and support the program services outlined in the Proposal? Is the Organization appropriate to administer such a program? Consider organizational capacity narrative and summary of qualifications.
Does the organization have the organizational capacity to serve as the sole administrator of this program?
Does the organization articulate the necessary partnerships and collaborations for successful program implementation?
Does the organization’s prior performance on City contract demonstrate that the organization is likely to be successful?
Total Points 30
APPROACH / PROGRAMMING WORK PLAN
Based on the Organization’s Program Activities Narrative and Work Plan, do the program activities narrative and work plan demonstrate a plan that is the reasonable and appropriate to undertake and support the program services outlined in the Proposal?
Is it clear that the programming will deliver the desired scope of services and reach the desired target communities? Does it align with the timeline requirements set forth in the Proposal?
Does the proposer outline eligibility requirements to receive services that are aligned with requirements in specifications? Does the proposer outline the process that they will use to ensure compliance with these requirements and how this process fits within the program workplan?
Does the proposer articulate a plan for outreach to potentially eligible clients with an emphasis on identified target populations?
Does the organization articulate how the program will minimize barriers to participation 5
Total Points 30
EVALUATION PLAN
Did the organization submit an Evaluation Plan? Is it clear that the organization has the appropriate processes in place to capture required data for evaluation?
Revised: 1/21/26
Did the organization establish a set of output and outcome metrics and targets that are measurable, reasonable, and demonstrate the impact of the proposed programming? Is it clear that the organization has the staffing, systems, and expertise in place to effectively deliver services and to track and report all proposed metrics and outcomes targets?
Is it clear that the organization has the appropriate processes in place to document and verify client eligibility as required, program outcomes as needed, etc? Did the organization agree to report in accordance with City requirements outlined in the solicitation? (Also consider performance under Organization’s History/Experience.)
Total Points 20
COST AND BUDGET
Is the program a good value for the expected impact, considering clients reached and services delivered?
Does the budget align with all outlined service caps and other budget requirements? 4
Did the organization submit a budget narrative that adequately accounts for and explains costs included with the submitted Program Budget?
Based on the Organization’s Program Budget is the budget reasonable and appropriate to undertake and support the program services outlined in the Application.
Total Points 20
SUMMARY
Organizational Capacity Evaluation 30
Programming Work Plan 30
Evaluation Plan 20
Cost and Budget 20
TOTAL POINTS AWARDED 100
Reviewer Signature:
Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .