6-ATT F - DH2546-AF RFSQ Eval Scorsht.pdf
PDF 157 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DH2630-AFV
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This document is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) for fund raising vendors, issued by the Salt Lake City School District under Solicitation #DH2546-AF. The scoresheet is designed to evaluate potential vendors for an approved vendor's list, with a comprehensive scoring methodology that assesses both mandatory requirements and technical criteria. The evaluation process includes a pass/fail assessment of minimum mandatory requirements and a detailed technical scoring system with weights assigned to four key areas: Fundraiser Details (40%), Vendor Qualifications & Experience (30%), References (20%), and Complaints/Problem Resolution (10%).
The scoring mechanism allows evaluators to rate proposals on a scale from 1 (Fail) to 5 (Excellent), with a required technical point threshold of 75% (375 out of 500 possible points). The total possible evaluation points are 500, distributed across the technical criteria sections. Currently, the scoresheet appears to be a template with no specific vendor information filled in, suggesting it is a preparatory document for the vendor evaluation process. The evaluation aims to create an approved list of fundraising vendors for the Salt Lake City School District, with a rigorous selection process that ensures vendors meet specific operational and performance standards.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
Score will be assigned as follows:
1 = Fail, the proposal fails to address some or all of the requirements; fails to accurately address some or all of the requirements, or fails to demonstrate they can perform 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria in the RFP unsatisfactorily 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP satisfactorily 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP and may exceed some 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses all requirements in the RFP and exceeds them
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 2.2 2 SOQ Gen Info - (2.3 Items 1. thru 7.) 2.3 3 SOQ Gen Info - W9 Form (2.3 Item 8.) 2.3
4 2.3 5 Valid Business License (2.3 Item 10.) 2.3 6 2.3
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (1-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1 2.4A 40 40.0% 200.0 0.0 1 2.4B 30 30.0% 150.0 0.0 1 2.4C 20 20.0% 100.0 0.0 1 2.4D 10 10.0% 50.0 0.0
100.0% 500.0 0.0
RFP
Section
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned Evaluation
4.2 75% 375.0 0.0 0.0%
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
100% 500 0
100% 500 0
Vendor Docs/Proposed Contract (2.3 Item 11.)
Vendor Qualifications & Experience
Total Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
References
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Complaints/Problm Resolution
Required Technical Point Threshold
Fundraiser Details
SOQ Gen. Info - State of Utah DOC Fundraiser Permit, co-venturer ltr or ltr of exemp (2.3 Item 9)
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Check ALL Blocks on Attachment C
ATTACHMENT F
APPROVED VENDOR'S LIST- FUND RAISING, SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
RFSQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
SOLICITATION # DH2546-AF
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .