5-RFP Q26051826 Score Sheet.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Q26051826
- Issued by
- Davis County, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Davis Technical College in Utah seeking proposals to research, write, and produce a comprehensive written history and print-ready publication commemorating the institution's 50th anniversary. The solicitation number is Q26051826. The project requires qualified writers, historians, or firms to document the College's founding, growth, and impact in both print and digital formats. No specific response dates, due dates, site visits, bidder meetings, award dates, or contract terms are detailed in the scoresheet document.
The project budget is $50,000.00. The evaluation will be based on a 100-point scale distributed across four weighted categories: Experience and Qualifications (25 points), Project Approach and Management (30 points), References (15 points), and Cost (30 points). Cost points will be allocated using a comparative formula whereby the lowest bidder receives 100 percent of available cost points, with all other bidders receiving proportional points based on their price relative to the lowest proposal. Bidders whose proposed price exceeds 200 percent of the lowest proposal will receive no cost points. Scoring for non-cost criteria ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores reflecting superior responsiveness to requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6-CLAIM OF BUSINESS CONFIDENTIALITY.pdf | ||
| 4-RFP Q26051826 50 YR Book.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-U3P BID INSTRUCTIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS.pdf | ||
| 2-ATTACH C DTC Payment TCs.pdf | ||
| 1-ATTACH A DTC TCS Goods and Service FY26.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Error! Main Document Only.
50 YEAR ANNIVERSARY INSTITUTIONAL HISTORY AND HISTORICAL PUBLICATION SOLICITATION # Q26051826
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Failure, no response 1 = Poor, inadequate, fails to meet requirement 2 = Fair, only partially responsive 3 = Average, meets minimum requirement 4 = Above average, exceeds minimum requirement 5 = Superior
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Score (0-5) Weight
Points
1. Experience and Qualifications (25 points possible)
| ---- |
| ---- |
| ---- |
| Research & Discovery |
| 15 points possible |
X 3
| Past Experience Similar |
| 10 points possible |
X 2
2. Project Approach and Management (30 points possible)
| ---- |
| ---- |
| ---- |
| Project Management |
| 15 points possible |
X 3
| Content Development |
| 15 points possible |
X 3
3. References (15 points possible)
| ---- |
| ---- |
| ---- |
| References |
| 15 points possible |
X 3
| 4. Cost (30 points possible) |
| 30 points possible |
* Inserted by Purchasing
TOTAL EVALUATION POINTS
(100 points possible)
Total
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. An offeror whose Proposed Price is more than double (200%) the Lowest Proposed Price will receive no points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Price/Lowest Proposed Price
Error! Main Document Only.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .