5-Part 8 Posting.pdf
PDF 281 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Accelerate Learning Licenses
- Solicitation number
- JK27-103
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a Notice of Intent to Award a Contract Without Engaging in a Standard Procurement Process issued by the Utah Department of Government Operations, Division of Purchasing and General Services, in coordination with the Cultural and Community Engagement - Stem Action Center. The procurement seeks licenses to an online portal for the STEM Education Innovator (SEI) program, which will enable 40 secondary educators to complete national STEM teacher certification courses during Year 2 of the program. The identified vendor is Accelerate Learning, which serves as the online delivery system for course content developed by the National Institute of STEM Education (NISE). The contract has an estimated value of up to $111,000 with a term of five years and no renewal options. No freight costs are anticipated. The document does not specify response dates, bidder meetings, or award dates; rather, it establishes a public notice period during which interested vendors may challenge the sole-source justification by submitting detailed documentation of their ability to provide comparable or equivalent services.
The procurement is being pursued as a sole-source award based on the determination that NISE is the only organization that has developed a research-based national STEM teacher certification focused on curriculum-agnostic instructional skills, and Accelerate Learning is the sole authorized online delivery platform for NISE content. The conducting procurement unit conducted extensive market research, including internet searches for national STEM teacher certifications and reviews of similar organizations such as STEMx, The STEM Alliance, and the National Consortium of Secondary STEM Schools, as well as inquiries regarding existing state cooperative contracts, and found no competing alternatives that meet the program's specific requirements. The document indicates that alternative programs identified—including NSF grant opportunities, STEM.org curriculum certification, University of Indianapolis programs, and ESS substitute teacher certification—do not fulfill the same educational objectives or eligibility criteria applicable to the SEI program's full-time licensed professional participants.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 2-Part 8 Notice.pdf.pdf | ||
| 4-Quote.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of Government Operations Division of Purchasing and General Services 4315 S 2700 W, FL 3, Taylorsville, UT 84129-2128 Phone: 801-957-7160 www.purchasing.utah.gov
Issuing Procurement Unit: Division of Purchasing
Conducting Procurement Unit: Cultural and Community Engagement - Stem Action Center
NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD A CONTRACT WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS
The Division of Purchasing is publishing this notice pursuant to the Utah Procurement Code. The Conducting Procurement Unit submitted this form to the Division of Purchasing claiming that it intends to award a contract without competition if it is determined by the Division of Purchasing, in writing, that:
• there is only one source for the procurement item;
• transitional costs are a significant consideration in selecting a procurement item; or
• the award of a contract is under circumstances, described in rules adopted by the applicable rulemaking authority, that make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit.
In the subsequent pages the Conducting Procurement Unit has identified its justification for wanting to award a contract without engaging in standard procurement process.
Determination of Other Interested Vendors
If the procurement item identified in this notice is to be awarded as a sole source (only one source for the procurement item), then this notice will help determine if there are any other interested and qualified vendors that meet the specifications of this notice. Any such vendors must submit the following information:
• The name of the contesting person; and
• A detailed explanation of the challenge, including documentation showing that there are other competing sources for the procurement item.
In addition, a vendor should include:
• Documentation that your firm can provide a comparable or better procurement item that meets or exceeds the specifications;
• Documentation that your firm can also provide the same proprietary procurement item or an equivalent procurement item; and
• If transitional costs are identified as the justification for this notice, submit a cost comparison of the identified transitional costs with your firm’s anticipated transitional costs.
Regardless of any prior communications with the Division of Purchasing or the State, all vendors interested in responding to this notice must submit a response to this posting containing complete responses to all of the information requested above.
DO NOT CONTACT THE CONDUCTING PROCUREMENT UNIT. Any questions regarding this notice, including obtaining additional information, can be obtained through the Division of Purchasing during the publication period. No action is required if you agree with this Notice.
If the purpose of this notice is an intent to award a sole source, after the public notice period has passed, and the Division of Purchasing determines that there are other interested and qualified vendors that meet the specifications of this notice, then the Division of Purchasing will not award a contract pursuant to this notice. An award without competition may still be made even if there are other interested vendors when the basis for the award is due to transitional costs or impracticality as stated above.
If, after the public notice period has passed, no valid challenges have been received, then the Division of Purchasing may award a contract to the identified vendor without competition.
Read the entire form very carefully before responding to this notice.
It is anticipated that this procurement will result in a:
RESULT ACTION
x
Agency Contract
The term of this contract (or extension) will be: 5 and renewal options: 0.
The agency may not make the procurement until the solicitation process is completed and a contract is written and signed by the agency, the vendor, and the Division of Purchasing.
Purchase Order The agency may not make the procurement until the solicitation process is completed, the purchase order is signed by the Division of Purchasing and delivered to the agency and the vendor.
Description of procurement item to be purchased: Licenses to online portal for STEM Education Innovator participants to complete national STEM teacher certification
Estimated value of the contract/purchase order/increase: Up to $111,000 / 5-year contract
Freight Cost (F.O.B. Destination, Freight Prepaid): $0.00
Vendor Name: Accelerate Learning
Explain in detail the service or product to be procured (additional information included in attached Scope of Work):
Accelerate Learning is the online host of the courses developed by National Institute of STEM Education for national STEM teacher certification. This course work will be incorporated into Year 2 of the STEM Education Innovators (SEI) program with 40 secondary educators. These educators will complete the courses and end year 2 with national STEM teacher certification.
CHECK THE BOX THAT IDENTIFIES WHY A CONTRACT SHOULD BE AWARDED WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD
PROCUREMENT PROCESS:
Sole Source - There is only one source for the procurement item. Complete Section A
Transitional Costs - Transitional costs are a significant consideration in selecting a procurement item and the results of a cost-benefit analysis demonstrate that transitional costs are unreasonable or cost-prohibitive, and that the award of a contract without engaging in a standard procurement process is in the best interest of the procurement unit.
Complete Section B
Impracticality - The award of a contract is under circumstances, described in rules adopted by the applicable rulemaking authority, that make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit.
Complete Section C
Trial use contract for a new or innovative procurement item, or for a procurement item with a novel or unproven use or application. Complete Section D
Extension of a contract without engaging in a standard procurement process. If extension will result in a request to increase the contract total, complete Section F below as well. Complete Section E
Request to increase total contract amount. Complete Section F
SECTION A: ONLY ONE SOURCE
1. What is unique about this procurement item to justify an award of contract without engaging in a standard procurement process? (Explain in detail why the service or product is only available from a single supplier.)
The National Institute for STEM Education (NISE) is the only organization that has developed a national STEM teacher certification. They have selected Accelerate Learning as the online delivery system for their content. No other research-based national STEM teacher certification exists from any other organization. Over the course of searching for other products, others were found that on the surface may look similar, but are not. Examples are identified below:
The NISE STEM certification is focused on developing STEM skills that are not content or curriculum specific. Instead, they are focused on developing a teacher's ability to build a STEM culture, regardless of what content they teach and is curriculum agnostic.
An NSF grant is for proposals that might develop STEM teacher skills, but this program does not currently exist. Some of our partners are currently looking into this as a way to expand our SEI program's capacity, but it does not actually provide a certification demonstrating STEM teacher skills.
STEM.org is a curriculum program, so when you purchase their curriculum you can become certified in their curriculum. It does not teach curriculum or content agnostic skills.
U Indy is a program for teachers in Indiana, and would be equivalent to a program offered by one of our state universities, if one existed, but one doesn't. Is it aligned to their state standards, which are not the same as Utah's or the same as national standards.
ESS is a company that helps districts and schools find substitutes and paraprofessionals. They hire people willing to be temporary workers in these positions, then contract with schools and districts to place them, similar to temp. agencies for other jobs. They are offering their staff members an opportunity to get STEM certified, which would make them more effective substitute teachers and paraprofessionals. My program participants are full time licensed professionals and do not work for ESS, and would not be eligible for this discounted rate.
The NISE program has developed a research based certification that focuses on curriculum- and content-agnostic instructional skills that improve a teacher's STEM teaching. It focuses on culture building as well as very specific strategies, such as asking questions and providing actionable feedback, that are known to make a difference in student understanding and engagement. It also teaches how to think like an engineer in any content: make observations, ask questions, predict, implement and test solutions, and redesign as needed, which is a complex skill many teachers do not know how to do with students given their time constraints. While they learn these skills, they build a portfolio of their learning which is assessed by NISE, and the participants are given feedback from multiple NISE coaches. Only by demonstrating mastery of each of 15 skills do they acquire their certification.
After completing a search in Google of other certification programs this is what comes up:
https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/national-stem-teacher-corps-pilot-program/nsf24-577/solicitation https://stem.org/certified/ https://uindy.edu/cebs/education/certification/stem https://ess.com/stem-certificate-program/
This is our response to the Google search of certification programs:
When we did the search we did find these programs, but they do not meet our needs. The NISE STEM certification is focused on developing STEM skills that are not content or curriculum specific. Instead, these are focused on developing a teacher's ability to build a STEM culture, regardless of what content they teach and is curriculum agnostic.
The NSF grant is for proposals that might develop STEM teacher skills, but this program does not currently exist. Some of our partners are currently looking into this as a way to expand our SEI program's capacity, but it does not actually provide a certification demonstrating STEM teacher skills.
STEM.org is a curriculum program, so when you purchase their curriculum you can become certified in their curriculum. It does not teach curriculum or content agnostic skills.
U Indy is a program for teachers in Indiana, and would be equivalent to a program offered by one of our state universities, if one existed, but one doesn't. Is it aligned to their state standards, which are not the same as Utah's or the same as national standards.
ESS is a company that helps districts and schools find substitutes and paraprofessionals. They hire people willing to be temporary workers in these positions, then contract with schools and districts to place them, similar to temp. agencies for other jobs. They are offering their staff members an opportunity to get STEM certified, which would make them more effective substitute teachers and paraprofessionals. My program participants are full-time licensed professionals and do not work for ESS, and would not be eligible for this discounted rate.
https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/national-stem-teacher-corps-pilot-program/nsf24-577/solicitation https://stem.org/certified/ https://uindy.edu/cebs/education/certification/stem https://ess.com/stem-certificate-program/
The NISE program has developed a research-based certification that focuses on curriculum- and content-agnostic instructional skills that improve a teacher's STEM teaching. It focuses on culture building as well as very specific strategies, such as asking questions and providing actionable feedback, that are known to make a difference in student understanding and engagement. It also teaches how to think like an engineer in any content: make observations, ask questions, predict, implement and test solutions, and redesign as needed, which is a complex skill many teachers do not know how to do with students given their time constraints. While they learn these skills, they build a portfolio of their learning which is assessed by NISE, and the participants are given feedback from multiple NISE coaches. Only by demonstrating mastery of each of 15 skills do they acquire their certification.
2. Could the procurement item be reasonably modified to allow for competition?
No. Not at this time. Maybe in the future if another research based national certification is developed this could be a competitive award.
3. Explain the market research performed.
Extensive internet searches for “National STEM Teacher Certification” were done, but nothing came up that fit our requirements. Then, I looked for National STEM organizations, such as STEMx, The STEM Alliance, and National Consortium of Secondary STEM Schools (NCSSS) and looked through what they offered to see if they have STEM Teacher certifications of any kind, but they did not.
4. What research have you conducted to ensure the requested procurement item is not available on an existing state cooperative contract?
Did a search, there is nothing on statewide contract at this time.
5. If there is only one source for the procurement item, list the names of other similar vendors contacted, contact person, and a summary of their response, Please see #1 for the full explanation.
SECTION B: TRANSITIONAL COSTS
1. Describe the existing equipment, technology, software, accessories, replacement parts, or service, hereafter referred to as equipment; include the original purchase price and date of purchase for the existing equipment.
2. Supply the following:
a. Procurement method that was used to purchase the existing equipment? (IFB, RFP, Sole Source):
b. Solicitation number, RQS number, or sole source number for the existing equipment:
c. Contract number for the existing equipment:
3. Attach the cost-benefit analysis, as required by Utah Code Section 63G-6a-802, that demonstrates that transitional costs are unreasonable or cost-prohibitive.
SECTION C: STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS IMPRACTICABLE
1.
Review R33-8-101c and provide supporting justification why awarding the contract through a standard procurement process is impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit under the circumstances; including any supporting documentation.
2. Supply the following, if applicable:
a. Procurement method that was used to purchase the existing equipment? (IFB, RFP, Sole Source):
b. Solicitation number, RQS number, or sole source number for the existing equipment:
c. Contract number for the existing equipment
SECTION D: TRIAL USE CONTRACT
1. Describe how this trial use contract for the new or novel procurement item will benefit your agency.
2. Describe how the procurement item is new or innovative, or how the procurement item has a proposed use/application that is novel or unproven.
3. Describe why a trial use contract exception is necessary for this procurement item at this time as opposed to conducting a standard procurement process to procure the procurement item.
4. What research have you conducted to ensure the requested procurement item is not available on an existing state cooperative contract?
5.
How long does the agency need to test the procurement item and what quantities of the procurement item (if applicable) will be necessary to test this procurement item? Note trial use contracts generally cannot exceed a period of 24 months.
SECTION E: EXTENSION OF CONTRACT WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS The procurement official may extend a contract up to 120 days. For extensions beyond 120 days, the procurement official may extend the contract after consulting with legal counsel.
Contract Start Date: Enter date. Current End Date: Enter date.
Proposed End Date: Enter date. Contract Number: Enter text.
1.
Is this request for a contract extension the result of a protest, appeal or court action? If yes, agency does not need to complete items 2-5 below. Provide the solicitation number that resulted in a protest and date of the protest, appeal or court action.
2.
Describe why extending this contract without engaging in a standard procurement process is necessary to avoid a lapse in a critical government service, OR to mitigate a circumstance that is likely to have a negative impact on public health, safety, welfare, or property.
3.
Confirm the procurement unit is currently engaged in a standard procurement process for the procurement item that is subject to the contract extension request and that the standard procurement process is delayed due to an unintentional error.
4.
Justification for Extension: check all that apply:
☐ The standard procurement process is delayed due to an unintentional error.
☐ A change in an industry standard requires one or more significant changes to specifications for the procurement item.
☐ To prevent the loss of federal funds.
☐ To mitigate the effects of a delay of a state or federal appropriation.
☐ To enable the procurement unit to continue to receive a procurement item during a delay in the implementation of a contract awarded pursuant to a procurement that has already been conducted.
☐ To enable the procurement unit to continue to receive a procurement item during a period of time during which negotiations with a vendor under a new contract for the procurement item are being conducted.
5. For the selection(s) above, provide any additional details regarding the circumstances justifying a contract extension.
SECTION F: REQUEST TO INCREASE TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
If the original solicitation type was an ACWESPP (e.g. sole source) and the additional amount will make the contract total go above $50K, then a public notice is required to increase the contract total. This public notice is not necessary if the procurement official waives the public notice requirement in accordance with R33-8-101e.
Contractor Name: Enter text. Contract Number: Enter text.
Original Contract Total: Enter text. Current Contract Total: Enter text.
Proposed Contract Total: Enter text. % Increase from Original: Enter text.
Solicitation Number: Enter text. Solicitation Type: Enter text.
Product or Service Description: Click to enter text.
Why is the contract total being increased? Check all that apply.
☐ The term of the contract is being extended (also complete Section E above if extending).
☐ The quantity of products or services needed has increased.
☐ The price, rate, or fee for a product or service has increased.
☐ A new or upgraded product or service is needed.
Provide details for the answer that was selected in the previous question. Provide any reasons for the increase.
Click to enter text.
| SECTION A: ONLY ONE SOURCE |
| SECTION B: TRANSITIONAL COSTS |
| SECTION D: TRIAL USE CONTRACT |
| SECTION E: EXTENSION OF CONTRACT WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS |
| SECTION F: REQUEST TO INCREASE TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .