5-Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 279 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SLCI26040
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This document is a comprehensive Score Sheet for the Salt Lake City Employee Gift Card Program (Solicitation #SLCI26040), issued by Salt Lake City Corporation. The solicitation seeks a qualified vendor to provide an Employee Gift Card Program for city departments, to be managed by the Department of Human Resources. The evaluation process is structured in four stages: Minimum Mandatory Requirements (Pass/Fail), Scoreable Technical Criteria, Interviews, and Cost, with a total possible evaluation score of 1,000 points. The technical evaluation encompasses five key areas: Qualifications, Approach and Timeline, Platform Functionality, Finance and Reporting, and Value Add, with varying weighted percentages and point allocations.
The scoring methodology is detailed, using a 0-5 point scale to assess proposals, with 0 representing a failed response and 5 representing an excellent response that exceeds requirements. The evaluation includes specific technical criteria thresholds, with a minimum required score of 60% (312 points) to be considered responsive. The cost component represents 30% of the total evaluation points, with the lowest-cost proposal receiving the maximum 300 points, and other proposals receiving proportional points based on their pricing relative to the lowest bid. The scoring sheet also highlights specific technical requirements, including integration capabilities with Workday, data export functionality, and compliance with City ethics requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf | ||
| 6-Attachment 2 - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment 3 - Cost Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2-SLCI26040.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-Attachment 1 - Sample Agreement.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Employee Gift Card Program | ||||||
| Solicitation # SLCI26040 | ||||||
| Attachment 4 - Score Sheet | ||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information. | ||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information. | |||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner. | ||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner. | |||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them. | ||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP. | |||||
| Stage 1: Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||
| 1 | City Ethics Requirement. | |||||
| 2 | Offeror certifies that Offeror does not require a line of credit or credit pull. | |||||
| 3 | Offeror certifies that Offeror’s proposed platform can export data such as employee name, type of recognition, and value of recognition through an excel or .csv file. | |||||
| 4 | Offeror certifies that Offeror’s proposed platform can integrate with Workday. | |||||
| 0 | ||||||
| Stage 2: Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Qualifications. | 0 | 20 | 19.2% | 100.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2 | Approach and Timeline. | 0 | 30 | 28.8% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |
| 3 | Platform Functionality. | 0 | 30 | 28.8% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |
| 4 | Finance and Reporting. | 0 | 15 | 14.4% | 75.0 | 0.0 | |
| 5 | Value Add. | 0 | 9 | 8.7% | 45.0 | 0.0 | |
| Scorable Technical Criteria Total | 100.0% | 520.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Possible Points | Points Earned | ||||||
| Total Technical Points | 100.00% | 520.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| Required Evaluation Criteria Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |
| RFP | 60% | 312.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Stage 3: Interviews | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||
| Interviews | RFP | 0 | 36 | 180.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Required Interview Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | |||
| RFP | 60% | 108.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Stage 4: Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| RFP | $0.00 | $0.00 | 30% | 300.00 | |||
| * The Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive 300 points. All other Offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their total cost is than the total lowest cost. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 52% | 520.00 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Interview Points | 18% | 180.00 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 300.00 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .