5-ATT E Scoresheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Gasoline and Diesel Fuel- Statewide
- Solicitation number
- BW26-3
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a scoresheet document associated with an RFP issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing for a statewide gasoline and diesel fuel supply contract. The procurement seeks bulk fuel supply services with a contract term of five years. The RFP methodology allows for multiple awards based on bidders meeting both a technical score threshold and a total score threshold, indicating that evaluation criteria are weighted across technical capabilities and overall proposal quality. Vendors must guarantee pricing for a 12-month period, and the contract carries no administrative fee.
The scoresheet serves as the evaluation instrument for assessing competing bids against established criteria to determine contract awards. Pricing terms are structured such that vendors provide fixed rates for the initial 12-month guarantee period, after which pricing adjustments may be negotiated. The procurement structure supports multiple concurrent awards, allowing the state to establish relationships with multiple qualified fuel suppliers. No set-asides, incumbent protections, or specialized funding requirements are noted in the opportunity description, indicating this is an open competition available to all qualified vendors capable of delivering bulk gasoline and diesel fuel supplies across the state.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-ATT B SOW Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Statewide RFP.pdf | ||
| 7-ATT C 9.17.26.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 4-ATT D Technical.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Cooperative-Contract-GoodsServices-Combined-9.16.2024 (32).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Gasoline and Diesel Fuel - Statewide | |||||||
| BW26-3 | |||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||||||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Division of Purchasing. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | |||||||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | |||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||
| 1 | Offeror must posses valid Utah Fuel Tax License | ||||||
| 2 | Offeror must hold active Hazmat Registration with U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) | ||||||
| 3 | Offeror confirms they can service all public fuel sites in each geographic area in which they are responding | ||||||
| 4 | Offeror has submitted a completed Attachment C: Cost Sheet | ||||||
| 5 | Offeror has submitted a completed Attachment D: Technical Criteria | ||||||
| 0 | |||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Experience and Qualifications | ATT: D | 50 | 35.7% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | Quality Control | ATT: D | 50 | 35.7% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | Ordering and Delivery | ATT: D | 40 | 28.6% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 100.0% | 700.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |
| ATT: D | 65% | 455.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| 300.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | Other cost evaluation methods may be used as long as they are within Procurement Code/Rule. Ensure the method for awarding points is clearly stated on the score sheeet and within the solicitation documents. | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 0% | 700.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 0% | 300.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 0% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .