5-AL26-015-RFP- Evaluation Scoresheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- AL26-015-RFP
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by Granite School District in Utah for an elementary Computer Science instructional platform. The RFP, designated AL26-015, seeks a vendor to provide pre-created coding lessons aligned to Utah Core and Computer Science Standards for grades PreK-6. The contract term runs from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, with renewal options available through June 2032. The evaluation scoresheet establishes the criteria and scoring methodology for assessing vendor proposals, with evaluators required to score yellow cells using a rubric scale of 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no response and 5 represents an excellent response that exceeds minimum requirements.
The evaluation process allocates points across two main categories: Technical Points and Proposal Requirements/Company Qualifications. Technical scoring includes five areas: Curricular Requirements (weighted at 3 points), Articulation of Computer Science Lessons (3 points), Development (1 point), Professional Development (1 point), and General Technical Requirements (1 point). The Curricular Requirements category further breaks down into five sub-requirements addressing curriculum mapping with standards alignment, detailed lesson plans, teacher support, curriculum differentiation methods, and assessment options. The Proposal Requirements section evaluates the firm's ability to provide services, experience of responsible personnel, and references from comparable districts. Cost points, valued at a possible 15 points, are evaluated and inserted by the Purchasing Department following technical scoring completion. Evaluators are instructed to save completed scoresheets with their initials appended to the filename.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Scoring
| Evaluation Scoring |
| AL26-015 |
| Requests for Proposals |
| Computer Science Articulated Online Lessons with Math and Science PreK-6 |
| Instructions: Provide a score for each yellow cell using the following rubric. Then save the spreadsheet with your initials being added to the end of the document name. | |||
| 0 = No reponse | |||
| 1 = Poor, inadequate, fails to meed requirement | |||
| 2 = Fair, only partially responsive | |||
| 3 = Good, meets minimum requirements | |||
| 4 = Very good, exceeds minimum requirements | |||
| 5 = Excellent | |||
| Technical Points | |||
| 1. Curricular Requirements | Score | Weight | Points |
| Requirement a: Outline of full curriculum package that includes all elements found under curricular requirements including: a curriculum map with computer science standard alignment to math and science standards at each grade level K-6; block coding, customizable instruction, and articulation of online lesson plans with district physical computing devices. | 3 | 0 | |
| Requirement b: Complete, detailed lesson plans. | 1 | 0 | |
| Requirement c: Teacher support for lesson implementation. | 1 | 0 | |
| Requirement d: Methods to differentiate the curriculum based on student levels of performance. | 1 | 0 | |
| Requirement e: Assessment - options for how a teacher might assess work completion | 1 | 0 | |
| 2. Articulation of Computer Science Lessons | 3 | 0 | |
| 3. Development | 1 | 0 | |
| 4. Professional Development | 1 | 0 | |
| 5. General Technical Requirements | 1 | 0 | |
| Proposal Requirements and Company Qualifications | |||
| Qualification 1. Provide the firm’s ability to provide the services as described | 2 | 0 | |
| Qualification 2. Vendor provides a description of the experience of the individual(s) who would be responsible for providing services to the district. | 1 | 0 | |
| Qualification 3. Vendor provides references of comprable work in other districts who use their product to integrate computer science standards with math and science core . | 1 | 0 | |
| Total Technical Points | 0.0 |
| Cost Points | |
| 3. Cost (Possible Points 15) | |
| Evaluated and Inserted by the Purchasing Department after Technical Scoring | |
| TOTAL EVALUATION POINTS | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .