5-5 2026 Holbrook USFS Trail Design Parameters.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
2026 Storm Drain Projects State and local contract opportunity
Solicitation number
Not on record
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This file contains technical design parameters established by the United States Forest Service for sustainable trail construction and maintenance across multiple user types and trail classifications. The document provides comprehensive guidelines for designing hiking/pedestrian trails, pack and saddle trails, bicycle trails, motorcycle trails, all-terrain vehicle trails, four-wheel drive vehicle trails, cross-country ski trails, snowshoe trails, and snowmobile trails, each categorized into five trail classes. For each trail type and class combination, the parameters specify design tread width, design surface type, protrusions, obstacles, design grade, cross slope, clearing height and width, shoulder clearance, and design turn radius. These parameters serve as technical standards for survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails based on their designed use and management intent. The guidelines allow for local deviations from design parameters when based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided deviations remain consistent with the general intent of the applicable trail class. The document references FSH 2309.18 sections and the Forest Service Trail Accessibility Guidelines (FSTAG) for additional technical provisions and tolerances.

The design parameters detailed in this document are applicable to the 2026 Big Rock Hiking Trail Project in Bountiful City, Utah, which involves construction of two separate hiking trail segments on United States Forest Service-managed public lands in the Mueller Park area. Schedule 1 consists of approximately 250 feet of trail with significant rock retaining and tread armoring work, while Schedule 2 comprises approximately 1.1 miles of trail with limited rock work. Both segments are to be constructed as Class 3 trails according to United States Forest Service trail classifications and built according to hiking parameters. For Class 3 hiker/pedestrian trails in non-wilderness single-lane configurations, the design parameters specify a tread width of 18 to 36 inches, a target grade of 3 to 12 percent with a short pitch maximum of 25 percent, and a design turn radius of 3 to 6 feet, among other specifications detailed in the file.

View the file

Other files for this state and local contract opportunity

Other files attached to 2026 Storm Drain Projects, newest first.
File Type Posted
4-2026 Storm Drain Projects Bid Set.pdf PDF
2-2026 Storm Drain Projects Bid Package.pdf PDF
1-NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS 2026 SD Projects.pdf PDF
3-Bountiful Landfill Retention Pond Sheet Set.pdf PDF
4-PRV 2017.pdf PDF
6-2020 Fire Hydrant Installation.pdf PDF
9-NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS 2026 WL Projects.pdf PDF
5-2020 Water Standard Trench Detail.pdf PDF
8-2026 Water Line Projects Bid Set.pdf PDF
3-2009 NEW water service.pdf PDF
2-2009 2 IN water service.pdf PDF
7-2009 TRANSFER water service.pdf PDF
1-2026 Water Line Projects Bid Package.pdf PDF
4-4 Bountiful Trail MasterPlan Map large Mar2025 With Trail Names.pdf PDF
1-1 NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS - 2026 Big Rock Hiking.pdf PDF
6-6 USFS Trail Design Parameters Hiking.pdf PDF
3-3 2026 Holbrook Trails Project Plans.pdf PDF
6-6 2026 Holbrook Forest Service Standard Trail Plans, annotated for Davis County.pdf PDF
4-4 Bountiful Trail Design 210830v1.1 NEPA LR.pdf PDF
3-3 Big Rock Hiking Trail Plans.pdf PDF
5-5 USFS Decision Memo Bountiful Trails - UWC DecisionMemo Final signed.pdf PDF
2-2 2026 Big Rock Hiking Trail Project Bid Document.pdf PDF
1-1 NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS - 2026 Holbrook Trails Construction Project.pdf PDF
8-Holbrook Trails flagged.txt TXT text file
7-Reference A Bountiful Trails NEPA Botanical Survey CCF 2025.pdf PDF
2-2 2026 Holbrook Trails Construction Project Bid Doc.pdf PDF
7-7 Forest Service Standard Trail Plans, annotated for Davis County.pdf PDF
8-Reference A Weed Management Plan 06.15.22.pdf PDF
9-Big Rock Trail flagged.txt TXT text file
7-Type A Drive Approach 8-2017.pdf PDF
1-2026 Misc. Concrete Bid Documents.pdf PDF
9-Type C Drive Approach 8-2017.pdf PDF
6-Type D Drive Approach 8-2017.pdf PDF
10-Type E Drive Approach 8-2017.pdf PDF
5-Type B Drive Approach 8-2017.pdf PDF
4-retaining wall 20 inch.pdf PDF
2-Dipstone outlet gutter transition.pdf PDF
3-NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS - 2026 Misc Concrete.pdf PDF
8-retaining wall 36 inch.pdf PDF
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

S u s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters Hiker/Pedestrian (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.11, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be es-tablished based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable trail class.

Designed Use

HIKER/PEDESTRIAN Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 32 Trail Class 42 Trail Class 52

Design

Tread

Width

Wilderness (Single

Lane) 0 – 12 6 – 18 12 – 24

Exception: may be 36 – 48 at steep side slopes

18 – 24

Exception: may be

36 – 48 at steep side slopes

Not applicable

Non-Wilderness

(Single Lane) 0 – 12 6 – 18 18 – 36 24 – 60 36 – 72

Non-Wilderness

(Double Lane) 36 36 36 – 60 48 – 72 72 – 120

Structures

(Minimum Width) 18 18 18 36 36

Design

Surface3

Type Native, ungraded

May be continuously rough

Native, limited grading

May be continuously rough

Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading

Intermittently rough

Native with improved sections of borrow or imported material, and routine grading

Minor roughness

Likely imported material, and routine grading

Uniform, firm, and stable

Protrusions ≤ 24

Likely common and continuous

≤ 6

May be common and continuous

≤ 3

May be common, not continuous

≤ 3

Uncommon, not continuous

No protrusions

Obstacles

(Maximum Height) 24 14 10 8 No obstacles

Design

Grade3

Target Grade 5% – 25% 5% – 18% 3% – 12% 2% – 10% 2% – 5%

Short Pitch

Maximum

40% 35% 25% 15% 5%

FSTAG: 5% – 12%2

Maximum

Pitch Density

20% – 40% of trail 20% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail 5% – 20% of trail 0% – 5% of trail

10/16/2008 s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use

HIKER/PEDESTRIAN Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 32 Trail Class 42 Trail Class 52

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

Natural side slope 5% – 20% 5% – 10% 3% – 7% 2% – 3%

(or crowned)

Maximum

Cross Slope

Natural side slope 25% 15% 10% 3%

Design

Clearing

Height 6 6 – 7 7 – 8 8 – 10 8 – 10

Width ≥ 24

Some vegetation may encroach into clearing area

24 – 48

Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

36 – 60 48 – 72 60 – 72

Shoulder

Clearance 3 – 6 6 – 12 12 – 18 12 – 18 12 – 24

Design

Turn

Radius No minimum 2 – 3 3 – 6 4 – 8 6 – 8

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum) see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 Trail classes 3, 4, and 5, in particular, have the potential to provide accessible passage. If assessing or designing trails for accessibility, refer to the Forest Service Trail

Accessibility Guidelines (FSTAG) for more specific technical provisions and tolerances (FSM 2350).

3 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters Pack and Saddle (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.12, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be es-tablished based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable trail class.

Designed Use

PACK AND SADDLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Tread

Width

Wilderness

(Single Lane) Typically not designed or actively managed for equestrians, although use may be allowed

12 – 18

May be up to 48 along steep side slopes

48 – 60 or greater along precipices

18 – 24

May be up to 48 along steep side slopes

48 – 60 or greater along precipices

May be up to 48 along steep side slopes

48 – 60 or greater along precipices

Typically not designed or actively managed for equestrians, although use may be allowed

Non-Wilderness

(Single Lane) 12 – 24

May be up to 48 along steep side slopes

48 – 60 or greater along precipices

18 – 48

48 – 60 or greater along precipices

24 – 96

48 – 60 or greater along precipices

Non-Wilderness

(Double Lane) 60 60 – 84 84 – 120

Structures

(Minimum

Width)

Other than bridges: 36

Bridges without handrails:

Bridges with handrails: 84 clear width

Other than bridges: 36

Bridges without handrails:

Bridges with handrails: 84 clear width

Other than bridges: 36

Bridges without handrails:

Bridges with handrails:

84 clear width

Design

Surface2

Type Native, with limited grading

May be frequently rough

Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading

Intermittently rough

Native, with improved sections of borrow or imported material and routine grading

Minor roughness

Protrusions ≤ 6

May be common and continuous

≤ 3

May be common, not continuous

≤ 3

Uncommon, not continuous

Obstacles

(Maximum

Height)

12 6 3 s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use

PACK AND SADDLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Grade2

Target Grade Typically not designed or actively managed for equestrians, although use may be allowed

5% – 20% 3% – 12% 2% – 10% Typically not designed or actively managed for equestrians, although use may be allowed

Short Pitch

Maximum

30% 20% 15%

Maximum

Pitch Density

15% – 20% of trail 5% – 15% of trail 5% – 10% of trail

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

5% – 10% 3% – 5% 0% – 5%

Maximum

Cross Slope

10% 8% 5%

Design

Clearing

Height 8 – 10 10 10 – 12

Width 72

Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

72 – 96 96

Shoulder

Clearance 6 – 12

Pack clearance: 36 x 36

12 – 18

Pack clearance: 36 x 36

12 – 18

Pack clearance: 36 x 36

Design

Turn

Radius 4 – 5 5 – 8 6 – 10

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum) see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters Bicycle (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.13, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be es-tablished based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable trail class.

Designed Use

BICYCLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Tread

Width

Single Lane 6 – 12 12 – 24 18 – 36 24 – 48 36 – 60

Double Lane 36 – 48 36 – 48 36 – 48 48 – 84 72 – 120

Structures

(Minimum Width) 18 18 36 48 60

Design

Surface2

Type Native, ungraded

May be continuously rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be common and continuous

Native, with limited grading

May be continuously rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be common

Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading

Intermittently rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be present, but not common

Native, with improved sections of borrow or imported materials and routine grading

Stable, with minor roughness

Likely imported material and routine grading

Uniform, firm, and stable

Protrusions ≤ 24

Likely common and continuous

≤ 6

May be common and continuous

≤ 3

May be common, but not continuous

≤ 3

Uncommon and not continuous

No protrusions

Obstacles

(Maximum Height) 24 12 10 8 No obstacles

Design

Grade2

Target Grade 5% – 20% 5% – 12% 3% – 10% 2% – 8% 2% – 5%

Short Pitch

Maximum

30%

50% on downhill segments only

25%

35% on downhill segments only

15% 10% 8%

Maximum

Pitch Density

20% – 30% of trail 10% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail 5% – 10% of trail 0% – 5% of trail s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use

BICYCLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

5% – 10% 5% – 8% 3% – 8% 3% – 5% 2% – 3%

Maximum

Cross Slope

10% 10% 8% 5% 5%

Design

Clearing

Height 6 6 – 8 8 8 – 9 8 – 9

Width 24 – 36

Some vegetation may encroach into clearing area

36 – 48

Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

60 – 72 72 – 96 72 – 96

Shoulder

Clearance 0 – 12 6 – 12 6 – 12 6 – 18 12 – 18

Design

Turn

Radius 2 – 3 3 – 6 4 – 8 8 – 10 8 – 12

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum) see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters Motorcycle (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.21, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be es-tablished based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable trail class.

Designed Use

MOTORCYCLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Tread

Width

Single Lane Typically not designed or actively managed for motorcycles, although use may be allowed

8 – 24 18 – 36 24 – 48 Typically not designed or actively managed for motorcycles, although use may be allowed

Double Lane 48 48 – 60 60 – 72

Structures

(Minimum Width) 36 48 48

Design

Surface2

Type Native, with limited grading

May be continuously rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be common and continuous

Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading

Intermittently rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be present

Native, with imported materials for tread stabilization likely and routine grading

Minor roughness

Sections of soft tread not common

Protrusions ≤ 6

May be common and continuous

≤ 3

May be common, but not continuous

≤ 3

Uncommon and not continuous

Obstacles

(Maximum Height)

May be common or placed for increased challenge

Common and left for increased challenge

Uncommon

Design

Grade2

Target Grade 10% – 25% 5% – 20% 3% – 10%

Short Pitch

Maximum

40% 25% 15%

Maximum

Pitch Density

20% – 40% of trail 15% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use

MOTORCYCLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

Typically not designed or actively managed for motorcycles, although use may be allowed

5% – 10% 5% – 8% 3% – 5% Typically not designed or actively managed for motorcycles, although use may be allowed

Maximum

Cross Slope

15% 10% 10%

Design

Clearing

Height 6 – 7 6 – 8 8 – 10

Width

(On steep side hills, increase clearing on uphill side by 6 – 12 )

36 – 48

Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

48 – 60 60 – 72

Shoulder

Clearance

6 – 12 12 – 18 12 – 24

Design

Turn

Radius 3 – 4 4 – 6 5 – 8

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum) see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters All-Terrain Vehicle (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.22, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be estab-lished based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the appli-cable trail class.

Designed Use

ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Tread

Width

Single Lane Typically not designed or actively managed for ATVs, although use may be allowed

48 – 60 60 60 – 72 Typically not designed or actively managed for ATVs, although use may be allowed

Double Lane 96 96 – 108 96 – 120

Structures

(Minimum Width) 60 60 60

Design

Surface2

Type Native, with limited grading

May be continuously rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be common and continuous

Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading

Intermittently rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be present

Native, with imported materials for tread stabilization likely and routine grading

Minor roughness

Sections of soft tread uncommon

Protrusions ≤ 6

May be common and continuous

≤ 3

May be common, but not continuous

≤ 3

Uncommon and not continuous

Obstacles

(Maximum

Height)

May be common or placed for increased challenge

May be common and left for increased challenge

Uncommon

Design

Grade2

Target Grade 10% – 25% 5% – 15% 3% – 10%

Short Pitch

Maximum

35% 25% 15%

Maximum Pitch

Density

20% – 40% of trail 15% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use

ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

Typically not designed or actively managed for ATVs, although use may be allowed

5% – 10% 3% – 8% 3% – 5% Typically not designed or actively managed for ATVs, although use may be allowed

Maximum

Cross Slope

15% 10% 8%

Design

Clearing

Height 6 – 7 6 – 8 8 – 10

Width

(On steep side hills, increase clearing on uphill side by 6 – 12 )

Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

60 – 72 72 – 96

Shoulder

Clearance

0 – 6 6 – 12 12 – 18

Design

Turn

Radius 6 – 8 8 – 10 8 – 12

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum) see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters Four-Wheel Drive Vehicle > 50 (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.23, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be established based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable trail class.

Designed Use

FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLE > 50 Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Tread

Width

Single Lane Typically not designed or actively managed for 4WD vehicles > 50 , although use may be allowed

72 – 84 72 – 96 96 – 120 Typically not designed or actively managed for 4WD vehicles > 50 , although use may be allowed

Double Lane 16 16 16

Structures

(Minimum Width) 96 96 96

Design

Surface2

Type Native, with limited grading

May be continuously rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be common and continuous

Native, with some on-site borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading

Intermittently rough

Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades < 5% may be present

Native, with imported materials for tread stabilization likely and routine grading

Minor roughness

Sections of soft tread uncommon

Protrusions ≤ 12

May be common and continuous

≤ 8

May be common and continuous

≤ 4

May be common and continuous

Obstacles

(Maximum Height)

May be common or placed for increased challenge

Common and left for increased challenge

Uncommon

Design

Grade2

Target Grade 10% – 21% 5% – 18% 5% – 12%

Short Pitch Maximum 25% 20% 15%

Maximum

Pitch Density

20% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail 5% – 10% of trail s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use

FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLE > 50 Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

Typically not designed or actively managed for 4WD vehicles > 50 , although use may be allowed

8% – 15% 5% – 12% 5% – 8% Typically not designed or actively managed for 4WD vehicles > 50 , although use may be allowed

Maximum

Cross Slope

15% 12% 8%

Design

Clearing

Height 6 – 8 6 – 8 8 – 10

Width 72 – 84

Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

72 – 96 96 – 144

Shoulder Clearance 0 – 6 6 – 12 12 – 18

Design

Turn

Radius 10 – 15 15 – 20 20 – 30

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters Cross-Country Ski (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.31, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be es-tablished based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable trail class.

Designed Use

CROSS-COUNTRY SKI Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Tread

Width

Single Lane Typically not designed or actively managed for cross-country skiing, although use may be allowed

2 – 4

Typically not groomed

6 – 8

Or width of grooming equipment

8 – 10

Or width of grooming equipment

Typically not designed or actively managed for cross-country skiing, although use may be allowed

Double Lane 6 – 8 8 – 12 12 – 16

Structures

(Minimum Width) 36 36 36

Design

Surface2

Type Generally no machine grooming

May receive occasional machine grooming for snow compaction and track setting

Regular machine grooming for snow compaction and track setting

Protrusions No protrusions No protrusions No protrusions

Obstacles

(Maximum Height)

Uncommon

Uncommon (no obstacles if machine groomed)

No obstacles

Design

Grade2

Target Grade 5% – 15% 2% – 10% 0% – 8%

Short Pitch

Maximum

25% 20% 12%

Maximum

Pitch Density

10% – 20% of trail 5% – 15% of trail 0% – 10% of trail

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

0% – 10% 0% – 5% 0% – 5%

Maximum

Cross Slope

(For up to 50 )

20% 15% 10% s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use

CROSS-COUNTRY SKI Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Clearing

Height

(Above normal maximum snow level)

Typically not designed or actively managed for cross-country skiing, although use may be allowed

6 – 8 8

Or height of grooming equipment

8 – 10 Typically not designed or actively managed for cross-country skiing, although use may be allowed

Width 24 – 60

Light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

72 – 120

Light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

96 – 168

Widen clearing at turns or if increased sight distance needed

Shoulder Clearance 0 – 6 0 – 12 0 – 24

Design

Turn

Radius 8 – 10 15 – 20

Or to accommodate grooming equipment

≥ 25

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum) see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters Snowshoe (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.32, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be estab-lished based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the appli-cable trail class.

Designed Use SNOWSHOE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Tread

Width

Single Lane Typically not designed or actively managed for snowshoe, although use may be allowed

36 36 – 48 36 – 60 Typically not designed or actively managed for snowshoe, although use may be allowed

Double Lane 60 72 72 – 96

Structures (Minimum

Width) 36 48 48

Design

Surface2

Type Generally no machine grooming

May receive occasional machine grooming for snow compaction

Likely to receive occasional machine grooming for snow compaction

Protrusions No protrusions No protrusions No protrusions

Obstacles (Maximum

Height)

Uncommon

Uncommon (no obstacles if machine groomed)

No obstacles

Design

Grade2

Target Grade 10% – 20% 5% – 15% 0% – 10%

Short Pitch

Maximum

30% 20% 15%

Maximum

Pitch Density

5% – 20% of trail 5% – 25% of trail 0% – 10% of trail

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

0% – 10% 0% – 5% 0% – 5%

Maximum Cross

Slope

20% 15% 10% s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use SNOWSHOE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Clearing

Height

(Above normal maximum snow level)

Typically not designed or actively managed for snowshoe, although use may be allowed

6 – 8 8 8 – 10 Typically not designed or actively managed for snowshoe, although use may be allowed Width 48

Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

Light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

72 – 96

Shoulder Clearance 0 12 12 – 24

Design

Turn

Radius 3 – 4 3 – 6 4 – 8

Or to accommodate grooming equipment

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum) see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Trail Design Parameters Snowmobile (FSH 2309.18, Section 23.33, Exhibit 01)

Design parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their designed use and trail class and consistent with their management intent.1 Local deviations from any design parameter may be es-tablished based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable trail class.

Designed Use

SNOWMOBILE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Tread

Width

Single Lane Typically not designed or actively managed for snowmobiles, although use may be allowed

4 – 6

Typically not groomed

6 – 8

Or width of grooming equipment

On turns with tight radius, increase groomed width to

≥ 10

8 – 10

Or minimum width of grooming equipment

On turns with tight radius, increase groomed width to ≥ 12

Typically not designed or actively managed for snowmobiles, although use may be allowed

Double Lane 10

Typically not groomed

10 – 12 12 – 20

Structures

(Minimum Width) 6 12 18

Design

Surface2

Type Generally no machine grooming

Commonly rough and bumpy

May receive occasional machine grooming for snow compaction and conditioning

Frequently rough and bumpy

Regular machine grooming for snow compaction and conditioning

Commonly smooth

Protrusions No protrusions No protrusions No protrusions

Obstacles

(Maximum Height)

Uncommon

Uncommon (no obstacles if machine groomed)

No obstacles

Design

Grade2

Target Grade 0% – 12% 0% – 10% 0% – 8%

Short Pitch

Maximum

35% 25% 20%

Maximum

Pitch Density

15% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail 5% – 10% of trail s ta in a b le T ra il B rid g e D e s ig n

Designed Use

SNOWMOBILE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5

Design

Cross

Slope

Target

Cross Slope

Typically not designed or actively managed for snowmobiles, although use may be allowed

0% – 10% 0% – 5% 0% Typically not designed or actively managed for snowmobiles, although use may be allowed

Maximum

Cross Slope

15% 10% 5%

Design

Clearing

Height

(Above normal maximum snow level)

6 6 – 8

Provide sufficient clearance for grooming equipment

8 – 12

Provide sufficient clearance for grooming equipment

Width 6 – 12

Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

8 – 14

Light vegetation may encroach into clearing area

10 – 22

Widen clearing at turns or if increased sight distance needed

Shoulder

Clearance 6 – 12 12 – 18 12 – 24

Design

Turn

Radius 8 – 10 15 – 20

Or sufficient radius for grooming equipment

25 – 50

1 For definitions of design parameter attributes (for example, design tread width and short pitch maximum) see FSH 2309.18, Section 05.

2 The determination of trail-specific design grade, design surface, and other design parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion poten-tial, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .