47PJ0020R0066 SOW Attachment 4.pdf

PDF 336 KB Posted

Attached to
LIMITED SCOPE & TENANT BACKFILL PROJECT GSA Design Excellence Solicitation for Lead Design Architect and Engineer
Solicitation number
47PJ0020R0066
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation requests qualifications for a design-build contract to modernize Building 48 on the Denver Federal Center. The project scope includes replacing major building systems, structural enhancements, roof replacement, maximizing daylight, relocating the main entry, clearing four satellite buildings for a new parking lot, and outdoor spaces. The estimated cost is $35-50 million. The General Services Administration will select up to three highly qualified offerors through a two-phase selection process to design and construct the project in accordance with Design Excellence and Construction Excellence principles. Phase 1 is a request for qualifications, and phase 2 a request for proposals including technical and price submissions, with technical factors significantly more important than price. The contract will be set aside for small businesses and awarded by January 2023 at the latest.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Design Build Statement of Work Building 48 Modernization, Denver Federal Center, Lakewood, CO

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

STATEMENT OF WORK

DESIGN-BUILD (DB) TEAM

DESIGN BUILD PROJECT DELIVERY

DENVER FEDERAL CENTER | BUILDING 48

MODERNIZATION PROJECT

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION:

PROJECT NAME BUILDING 48 MODERNIZATION PROJECT

SOLICITATION NUMBER 47PJ0020R0066

REGION ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION 8

DIVISION GSA OFFICE OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION

BUILDING NAME BUILDING 48

BUILDING ADDRESS 1 DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, BLDG. 48, DENVER CO 80225

CONTRACTING OFFICER LEN WILSON

PROJECT MANAGER DANA COOLBROTH

LAST REVISION 02.13.2020

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Contents

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7

A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8

1. GENERAL INFORMATION 8

2. SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT INFORMATION: 8

B. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 10

C. PROJECT DELIVERY APPROACH 11

D. CONTRACTOR TEAM 12

E. PROJECT DURATION AND SCHEDULE MILESTONE 13

F. PROJECT STAGES 13

G. PROJECT DELIVERY TEAM ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 14

II. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 16

A. OWNER’S PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS (POR) 16

1. THE OWNER’S POR - BASIS OF DESIGN 16

2. SPATIAL DATA MANAGEMENT (SDM) 17

B. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 17

1. APPLICABILITY 17

2. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA DOCUMENTS 18

C. PROJECT DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS 18

1. DESIGN EXCELLENCE 18

2. CONSTRUCTION EXCELLENCE 19

3. ART IN ARCHITECTURE (AiA) PROGRAM 20

4. ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY 20

5. BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM) 24

6. FIRE PROTECTION & LIFE SAFETY 24

7. ACCESSIBILITY 25

8. PHYSICAL SECURITY 25

9. BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 25

10. UTILITY COORDINATION 25

11. BUILDING DESIGN STANDARD (BDS) 26

12. HISTORIC PRESERVATION 26

13. COMMUNITY COLLABORATION 26

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

14. PERSONNEL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS 26

15. PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE 28

D. PROJECT MANAGEMENT 28

1. PURPOSE 28

2. ORGANIZATION 28

3. COST CONTROL AND COST TRACKING 29

4. SUBCONTRACTING, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, AND EEO 29

5. SCHEDULE 29

6. QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (QPC) 29

7. COMMUNICATIONS PLAN 31

8. DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE 32

9. PARTNERING 34

10. COMMISSIONING 34

11. DOCUMENT SECURITY 34

12. ELECTRONIC AND PRINT MEDIA SUBMISSIONS 34

13. RECORD KEEPING 35

14. CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL RFI PROCESSING 35

15. CONSTRUCTION STAGE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 35

E. RISK MANAGEMENT 35

1. RISK MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP(S) 35

2. RISK REGISTRY 35

F. ELECTRONIC PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ePM) 35

1. GENERAL 35

2. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA DOCUMENTS 36

3. CONTENTS OF ePM 36

4. EQUIPMENT 37

5. TRAINING 38

6. SUPPORT 38

7. PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS 38

8. DATA OWNERSHIP 38

G. SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT 38

1. DETAILED PROJECT SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE 38

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

H. COST MANAGEMENT 39

I. CHANGE MANAGEMENT 40

III. SCOPE OF SERVICES 40

A. PROJECT START-UP 40

1. SITE PREPARATION 40

B. PRE-AWARD - DESIGN STAGE 41

C. PRE-DESIGN PHASE - AFTER AWARD 41

1. BIM COORDINATION AND EXECUTION PLAN (BEP) 41

D. DESIGN STAGE SERVICES 43

1. PROJECT MEETINGS 43

2. DESIGN SUBMISSIONS AND REVIEWS 44

3. DESIGN EXCELLENCE PEER REVIEWS 44

4. COMMISSIONER PRESENTATION 44

5. DESIGN QUALITY REVIEWS 44

6. DESIGN STAGE COMMISSIONING 44

7. ART IN ARCHITECTURE PROCUREMENT 44

8. FIRE PROTECTION CERTIFICATION 45

9. OWNER’S PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS 45

E. CONCEPT DESIGN PHASE 45

1. CONCEPT DESIGN COORDINATION 45

2. DESIGN CONCEPT SUBMISSION - AFTER AWARD 46

3. COST ALLOCATION UPDATE (COLOR OF MONEY) 47

4. ART IN ARCHITECTURE PROPOSAL REVIEW 47

5. INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ARTWORK 47

6. DEFINED CONCEPT PHASE SUBMISSIONS 47

7. FINAL CONCEPT DESIGN EXCELLENCE PEER REVIEW 47

8. FINAL DESIGN CONCEPT SUBMISSION 48

10. COST ALLOCATION UPDATE 49

11. FINAL CONCEPT DESIGN REVIEW MEETING AND COMMENTS 49

F. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DD PHASE 49

1. DD COORDINATION 49

2. SPACE PLANNING 50

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

3. CONSTRUCTION WORK SEQUENCE PLANNING 51

4. CONTRACTOR DEFINED DD SUBMISSIONS 51

5. DD MOCKUPS AND TESTS 51

6. DD 50% SUBMISSION 51

7. DD FINAL SUBMISSION 51

8. REVIEW MEETING(S) AND COMMENTS 52

9. DESIGN STAGE COMMISSIONING RECORD 52

10. DD DESIGN EXCELLENCE PEER REVIEW 52

11. DD INTEGRATED PROJECT REVIEW 52

G. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CD PHASE 52

1. CD PHASE COMMISSIONING 52

2. CD COORDINATION 53

3. DESIGN-BUILDER DEFINED CD SUBMISSIONS 54

4. TRADITIONAL IN-PROGRESS CD (65% DESIGN) SUBMISSION 54

5. IN-PROGRESS CD REVIEW MEETING AND COMMENTS 55

6. TRADITIONAL PRE-FINAL CD (90% DESIGN) SUBMISSIONS 55

7. PRE-FINAL CD REVIEW MEETING AND COMMENTS 55

8. TRADITIONAL FINAL CD (100% DESIGN) SUBMISSIONS 56

9. FINAL CD COMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES 56

10. GSA CAD LIBRARY COORDINATION 56

11. LEED® DESIGN CREDIT SUBMISSION 56

H. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 56

1. CONSTRUCTION PHASE BIM REQUIREMENTS 56

2. CONSTRUCTION START COORDINATION 56

3. CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS PHOTOGRAPHS 57

4. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 57

5. TURNOVER PROCESS SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION 62

I. CLOSEOUT STAGE 63

1. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) MANUALS SUBMITTAL 63

2. WARRANTIES, GUARANTEES AND CERTIFICATES 64

3. PROJECT AWARDS CERTIFICATIONS 64

4. FINAL RECORD DOCUMENTS 64

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

5. MATERIAL SAMPLES, ATTIC STOCK AND SPARE PARTS 64

6. BUILDING DESIGN STANDARD 65

7. CAD LIBRARY COORDINATION 65

8. PROJECT PHOTOS AND FINAL DESIGN PRESENTATION RENDERINGS 65

9. DEDICATION CEREMONY 66

10. BUILDING PRESERVATION PLAN BPP 66

11. MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION PERIOD 66

J. TENANT OCCUPANCY STAGE 66

1. OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT AND RENT START 66

2. FURNITURE, FIXTURES, AND EQUIPMENT (FF&E)/MOVE-IN PHASE 66

3. TENANT TECHNOLOGIES 67

4. OPERATIONS/SERVICE PHASE 67

K. CONTRACT FINANCIAL CLOSEOUT 67

IV. ADMINISTRATION 67

A. DESIGN/CD PHASE PROGRESS REVIEWS AND PAYMENTS 67

1. PROGRESS PAYMENT SCHEDULE 67

2. MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORTS 67

3. PROGRESS REVIEW MEETINGS 68

4. DELAYS 68

5. PAYMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE WORK 68

6. TRAVEL 68

7. REPRODUCTION AND DELIVERY 68

V. APPENDIX 69

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Note to the reader:

In this SOW the term Contractor refers to the Design-Build (DB) Team.

GENERAL:

The Contractor shall provide all labor and materials required to provide architectural, engineering, construction, and other related services necessary to design and to construct an office building compliant with applicable codes. Related services include, but are not limited to, site planning, soil borings, archaeological monitoring, utility relocation, environmental mitigations as defined in the environmental study, permitting, testing and inspection during construction, commissioning and potential additional geotechnical analysis of the site.

CONTRACT TYPE: Firm Fixed Price (FFP)

CONTRACT OPTIONS:

1) Full excavation of the northeast corner of the building, as depicted in the renderings of the Program Development Study (PDS, see Section V), with additional penetrations for natural daylight (priced).

2) Clerestory windows at the new visitor entryway (priced).

3) Raised floor system throughout a majority of the building (priced).

4) Exposed ceiling for industrial aesthetic (priced).

A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

The General Services Administration (GSA) intends to award a firm-fixed price Design- Build Contract for the modernization of Building 48 on the Denver Federal Center campus pursuant to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures (FAR Subpart 36.3), incorporating Design and Construction Excellence, as well as Art in Architecture. The project will convert the current building use as a warehouse to a modern office space for a Federal tenant.

Building 48 is an one‐story structure, with partial basements and a small mechanical penthouse, located on the north edge of the Denver Federal Center Campus, between 3rd Street and 5th Street, and between Center Avenue and North Avenue. The original building was constructed in 1941 during World War II as part of a small arms munitions manufacturing plant. The structure has been expanded several times to its current area of 154,422 gross square feet. After the war, it was converted to office and storage use by the Federal government. Most recently it housed the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) until being vacated in 2013.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Although numerous additions have been constructed since 1941, none of the expansions involved significant improvements to the existing parts of the structure. The most recent major addition was in 1971. Due to its age and lack of modernization, the building’s architectural, mechanical and electrical systems have exceeded their useful service life. The structural system is adequate for upgraded use. Currently the building is empty.

The Interior Business Center (IBC) currently occupies three lease locations in Lakewood, CO, totaling 195,586 USF. IBC currently has 699 employees at the Lakewood locations and plans to expand to 890 employees in the Building 48 location.

IBC will be the sole tenant of Building 48 once building upgrades are complete. They will consolidate all of their functions into the building, and expand within it. A majority of the building would be open office space, along with a number of conference rooms, offices, and other shared space.

Architectural goals include the incorporation of welcoming visiting entry, usable outdoor spaces for employees, and the incorporation of natural daylight throughout the space. In order to support the incoming personnel, site improvements include the paving of a new parking lot directly adjacent to the building. Performance and sustainability goals include LEED and SITES certification, as well compliance with GSA’s gBUILD program.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT INFORMATION:

a. Program Development Study (PDS)

The PDS is provided within the Appendix (Section V) of this SOW. The PDS provides details related to IBC’s mission, organizational structural, and Program of Requirements (POR). It also includes a technical evaluation of existing building conditions, and recommended building improvements to accomplish the project goals.

The PDS is intended to serve as a guideline to inform the design to accomplish the Project Objectives listed in Section B below, and for preparation of the Contractor’s initial Design Concept. Renderings are provided which show possible design solutions; however, these were used for scoping, budgeting and visioning purposes, only, and are not intended to be strictly adhered. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to provide the design for the space within the design and construction budget.

That being stated, there are features of the PDS concept, which are not specifically required to accomplish the scope, but are highly desired if able to be accomplished within the range provided in the solicitation. These features are listed as Options in the section above, and are to be provided and priced with the Contractor’s proposal in Phase 2 or the procurement.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Additionally, the PDS provides a list of Technical Performance Criteria. This is based on the observations, interpretations, and recommendations of the architectural and engineering team performing the study, again for scoping, budgeting, and visioning. This also informed the environmental investigations performed by GSA, which are discussed in the paragraph below. The Technical Performance Criteria may be used by the Contractor for scoping and pricing the Design Concept, but it is the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure adherence to latest codes and standards during design, as well as produce the best value approach and design to accomplish the Project Objectives listed in Section I, B.

b. Environmental Studies

Multiple sources of environmental information are provided in Section V. The PDS includes a lead and asbestos survey for the interior of Building 48, as well as a general environmental investigation of the site east of the building, intended for the paving of the new parking lot. To support the new parking lot, the satellite buildings east of the building will be demolished, as identified in the PDS. Section V also includes the Pre-Demolition Survey for each of these buildings. No constructive testing has been performed in the roofing of Building 48, which is suspect for asbestos. This will be the responsibility of the Contractor following award.

The Denver Federal Center campus is known to have soils contaminated with asbestos and other materials throughout its use as a WWII munitions manufacturing facility and other Federal operations. An agreement between GSA and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) includes the investigation of sites throughout the campus suspect for containing such contaminants. GSA has performed a Phase 4 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) for the Denver Federal Center (DFC) Investigation Area (IA) 4C (Phase 4 RFI), which includes the site area for the new Building 48 parking lot and is provided in Section V. GSA is in the process of completing a Corrective Measure Workplan for Denver Federal Center (DFC) Investigation Area (IA) 4C. Once this completed, GSA shall provide the document to the offerors.

c. Security

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) performed a Facility Security Assessment (FSA) which resulted in a recommended that Building 48 be categorized as a Facility Security Level (FSL) 2. Based on that FSA, DHS also provided GSA with a Vulnerability Survey Report (provided in Section V), inclusive of recommended physical security infrastructure to be provided in and around the building as part of the modernization.

d. Stormwater

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

A memorandum (provided in Section V) was issued by the Office of the Chief Architect (OCA) on June 20, 2019 in reference to the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, Section 438 (Stormwater). It provides an interpretation of the Act and language to ensure compliance with respect to projects within PBS.

Some of the language within the memorandum was deemed unclear as it relates to projects occurring within Region 8; therefore, a request for clarifications was issued from the Region 8 Environmental Programs Group, the responses for which are provided in Section V. Based on these clarifications, it is Region 8’s interpretation that the Building 48 Modernization Project must offset the 25 year, 95th percentile stormwater volume with respect to the development required of the parking lot, only.

While the roofing of the building will be altered by modernization, because it is pre-existing, no stormwater offset is required for the roof area.

To assist the Contractor in their proposal and pricing, a volume calculation for the 25 year, 95th percentile is provided in Section V, which shall be validated by the Contractor following award. Also provided in Section V is Technical Guidance related to Section 438 to further assist in the effort, as well as a DFC Stormwater Survey.

B. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Project Goals:

GSA, in collaboration with its clients, stakeholders, and contractors, intends to modernize Building 48 to an office building that exceeds IBC’s organizational needs, and be a focus of pride for IBC employees. The project shall be a functionally aesthetic, sustainable, cost-effective, high-performing, Federal office building.

Project Objectives:

This project will be accomplished under GSA’s Design Excellence Program. The DB Contractor will be contracted through a two-stage source selection process ensuring best value to the Government, its clients and the citizens of the United States of America. The design and construction of this office shall produce a high quality, high performance facility on budget and on time. The built project must accomplish all of the following:

Modernize and transform the building from its current state to a modern office building meeting IBC’s program needs and intent for employee expansion.

Match as closely as possible the Room Data Matrix provided in Section 02.12 of the Program Development Study (PDS) (see Section V).

Provide a public entryway, usable outdoor space for employees, and natural daylight throughout the building, including the lower story.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Provide a new parking lot for IBC employees as large as can be accommodated within the project site.

Provide a high-performance workplace that enhances all human factors including: health, functional efficiency, productivity, space flexibility, air quality, and comfort in thermal, acoustic and visual perspectives and utilizing natural light.

Achieve the status of a high-performance green building meeting federal energy and water conservation goals and incorporating exceptional integration of architectural form and optimized building systems which provide excellent indoor environmental quality.

Extend the overall service life of the building.

Utilize Design, Construction, and Operational Excellence practices to design and construct an office space of outstanding quality and value.

C. PROJECT DELIVERY APPROACH

GSA envisions a highly collaborative design build delivery approach for this project. The expectation is that the DB contractor will work closely with of all the stakeholders to deliver a project that meets the expectations and needs of the tenant(s), as well as the GSA’s requirements for a sustainable high performing green building.

The DB team will be selected through a two-step ‘best value’ selection process that meets the goals of GSA design in excellence program. The first step will consist of evaluating team composition, technical ability and past performance. From this evaluation, GSA will provide a voluntary short list. The second step of this process will require the DB teams to participate in a design concept presentation and provide estimates associated with their concept. After selection, the DB build team will further develop the initial concept to final concepts. This will be presented to the GSA Public Buildings Service Commissioner for final approval of the design concept.

During the development period from initial concept to final concept the DB team will work in close consultation with GSA, the tenant and the Contractor to ensure that of the goals are realized.

D. CONTRACTOR TEAM

The Contractor shall provide experts in disciplines listed in PBS-P100, Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service, and as otherwise required in this section, with credentials as indicated, as they apply to this project. The Contractor shall provide sufficient staff of project managers, architects, design engineers, field engineers, superintendents, inspection and testing engineers, scheduling specialists, cost engineers, clerical and accounting personnel, etc. to perform the required work.

Contractor team members may serve more than one of the above referenced functions.

During the performance of the services required under this contract, the Contractor shall obtain GSA written consent before making any substitution for subcontractors and

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

outside associates or consultants specifically identified and agreed to during negotiations.

The Contractor shall utilize the personnel named in its offer to perform the services required under this contract. If any of the personnel named in the accepted Contractor proposal (incorporated into this contract by reference) become unavailable, the Contractor shall promptly submit a complete written resume for a proposed substitution, any other information necessary for the GSA to approve or disapprove, and a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitution.

In addition to the key team members identified above, the Contractor shall provide administrative, clerical, and technical personnel as necessary to perform the services required under this contract.

At a minimum, the Contractor’s team members, providing expertise, should consist of the following:

Expertise:

a. Corporate Executive

b. DB Project Manager

c. Architectural Designer

d. AE Project Manager

e. Interior Architect/Interior Designer

f. Engineering Designers - All Disciplines

g. Building Envelope Consultant

h. LEED/Sustainability Specialist

i. Energy Modeler of Record (responsible for developing the energy model that achieves the energy requirements)

j. Blast Consultant

k. A/V Coordinator/Integrator

l. Security Consultant

m. Lighting Design Consultant

n. Landscaping Architect/Urban Designer

o. Acoustic Consultant

p. Registered Fire Protection Engineer

q. Lead Environmental Coordinator

r. Construction Superintendent

s. Quality Control Superintendent

t. Project Engineer

u. Construction Supervisors

v. Construction Scheduler

w. Safety Officer

E. PROJECT DURATION AND SCHEDULE MILESTONE

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The GSA project delivery schedule is included in the Section V, D. [Editor: Insert Draft schedule in Section V]. [Editor. The Government will consider Contractor proposals that involve fast-tracking (overlapping the design and construction stages to achieve a shorter overall schedule that leads to a lower overall cost).]

Milestone Dates:

Contractor Award/NTP July 2020 Peer Review After award October 2020 POR Review, validation and finalization October 2020 Commissioners Presentation November 2020 Acceptance of DD/Start of Construction July 2021 Construction Substantially Complete July 2023 Tenant Occupancy August 2023 But No Earlier Than No limit on early delivery Measurement and Verification 12 months after occupancy (not to exceed 14 months from substantial completion)

F. PROJECT STAGES

The project has been divided into the following stages:

Stages:

a. Design Stage

b. Construction Stage

c. Occupancy and Close-out Stage

G. PROJECT DELIVERY TEAM ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

In the performance of the requirements of this contract, the Contractor shall work in concert with other parties on the Project Delivery Team. The Project Delivery Team shall include the CMa, CxA, other contractors, GSA personnel, customer agency representatives, and other stakeholders. The GSA shall develop, periodically update, and maintain throughout the course of the project, a listing of the Project Delivery Team membership and respective roles and responsibilities. The other GSA-contracted major parties involved or to be involved in the Project Delivery Team, and their respective overall roles and responsibilities, are as follows:

a. GSA’s Project Manager (PM)

The PM is the owner’s primary commissioning representative. As the common point of contact for the other members of the Contractor’s team, the PM facilitates coordination between the Commissioning Authority (CxA), Commissioning Coordinator and the DB Team.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

b. GSA’s O&M Staff (OMS)

Though the PM is the Owner’s primary point of contact, the Owner’s Operating & Maintenance Staff actively participate in developing the “Systems Acceptance Criteria” and “Functional Test Procedures”, and evaluates the Contractor-provided training. They may also participate in functional performance testing. The building operators participate in the commissioning process at the direction of the PM.

c. Commissioning Agent (CxA)

The Commissioning Agent (CxA) is responsible for developing the commissioning requirements for incorporation into the DB contract performance specification. CxA services will consist of work as necessary to verify and document compliance with the GSA performance objectives throughout the design, construction, start-up, and the initial period of operation. The Contractor advises the Owner on issues involving the commissioning process, emphasizing the long-term performance and maintainability of the systems included in the commissioning scope of work. The Contractor is required to advise the Owner of deficiencies involving the design, construction, testing, adjusting and balancing, or other deficiencies that would compromise the ability of the facility to meet the needs of the Owner. The Contractor is authorized to recommend to the Owner the acceptance, modification, or rejection of all materials, procedures, schedules, tests, reports, or other required commissioning submittals. The Contractor is not authorized to change existing Contract Documents, schedules, costs, or scope of work for any of the parties involved (DB).

d. Commissioning Authority (CA)

The CA is the leader of the Commissioning Team (CxA).

e. LEED/SITES Coordinator

The LEED/SITES consultant is part of the DB team and will be responsible for maintaining all LEED/SITES documentation necessary to meet the stated project goal(s). The LEED/SITES consultant will be responsible for registration and submission of all required documents for certification. The Contractor will monitor the LEED process throughout the project and will provide input to the DB team in developing design concepts that ensure achievement of the LEED goal.

f. Construction Manager as Advisor (CMa)

The Construction Manager as advisor (CMa) shall ensure that GSA interests as the owner are well served. In this regard, the CMa shall assist the GSA in ensuring that the GSA requirements regarding scope, schedule, budget, quality and other aspects of the project are satisfied. The CMa shall serve as a facilitator and coordinator of the activities of all parties to ensure that the project execution proceeds per plan. During

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

the Design Development and the Construction Documents Phase, the CMa shall perform services relating to design review and coordination and budget control. The CMa shall serve as the value engineering (VM) consultant. The CMa shall also perform Construction Delivery Phase, Closeout Stage and Tenant Occupancy Stage services to ensure that the design intent is refined and clarified as necessary during construction, realized in the completed facility, and conveyed successfully into facility management, operation and maintenance. The CMa shall participate in the commissioning process, and coordinate with the GSA and the CxA to identify appropriate commissioning program goals and to develop supporting inspection and testing practices to meet the objectives of the project commissioning plan.

g. AiA

Art in Architecture: GSA will contract with an artist and the Contractor may be requested to coordinate and design the infrastructure necessary to display the Art in Architecture.

h. DB

The Design Build (DB) Team is required to perform two components of work: Design Stage services and Construction Stage work. Design Stage services include providing Design Concept and Design Development Phase services. Construction Stage work includes preparation of construction documents and performance of construction.

The DB provides completed systems that are constructed and operate in accordance with the construction documents. They also assist with the development of the functional performance test (FPT) procedures and are responsible for performing the FPTs. The DB has the ultimate commissioning responsibility; however, each subcontractor that participates in the construction of systems within the commissioning scope (i.e. the mechanical, DDC control system, test and balance, and electrical subcontractors) shall provide a representative to participate on the Commissioning Team.

i. DB Design Team

The term DB Design Team refers to the team of architects and engineers that are part of the Design Build Team. The DB Design Team will participate in all phases of the commissioning process as the authority on design intent.

j. DB Commissioning Coordinator (CC)

The DB Commissioning Coordinator is responsible for managing the performance of the DB’s subcontractors in the specified commissioning work.

k. Other

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The GSA may engage other parties to perform specialized duties and requirements as appropriate for the project.

II. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The General Requirements shall apply to all project phases/stages. Some of the requirements noted in this section may be subject to exercise of contract option(s).

As a general matter, the Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (P-100) represents the overarching document that governs the Contractor’s performance of work. In addition, other policies and procedures (e.g., the P-120 and tenant agency design guides) provide detailed procedures and requirements that the Contractor shall follow. The purpose of this Statement of Work is to primarily set forth services that the Contractor shall provide in addition to the services outlined in other documents (refer to Section V, subsection B).

A. OWNER’S PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS (POR)

1. THE OWNER’S POR - BASIS OF DESIGN

The Design Stage services and Construction Stage work under this Statement of Work must comply with the GSA Owner’s Program of Requirements (POR) documentation located in the Program Development Study (PDS) provided in Section V of this Statement of Work. The POR provides the detailed requirements for each building space including: function, finishes, adjacencies, equipment, security, circulation, servicing, P- 100 tier and other performance characteristics. The POR includes requirements for all space types including service, tenant, public, parking, etc. The Contractor shall design to the area specified in the POR. The POR space requirements must be confirmed at each stage of the design development and construction document phase and is to be measured in accordance with the GSA National Business Space Assignment Policy.

Refer to Section V for requirements and processes.

2. SPATIAL DATA MANAGEMENT (SDM)

The Spatial Data Management (SDM) Program is a GSA defined process to measure, record, and maintain federally owned and leased space assignments to support rent bills and provide transparency to all stakeholders. Refer to Section V, subsection C, Spatial Data Management for additional requirements. Additional information related to SDM can be found at https://www.gsa.gov/real-estate/design-construction/spatial-data-management-overview.

As noted in the P-100, at each submission stage, the Contractor shall provide an IFC BIM and 2D CAD plans, one for each level of the facility, with assignment data and space boundaries in compliance with the National Business Space Assignment Policy.

The P-100 and GSA BIM Guide 02 contain additional requirements for SDM.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Contractor shall design the Building 48 Modernization Project so as not to exceed the Congressional space authorization, and shall not deviate from the POR without prior written approval from the CO.

As per P-100, a spatial reconciliation report is required at the design submittal stages.

The reconciliation report shall ensure that the programmatic areas are fully defined, that circulation factors are properly applied, allowances are included for support areas and options accounted for in the design program. It should include tabulations of the usable, rentable and gross areas of the project.

The Contractor shall use the GSA Pricing Desk Guide and the National Business Space Assignment Policy (NBSAP) Guide which explains facility measurement. The Contractor shall coordinate with the regional SDM manager in development of the reports and CAD assignment plans.

The Pricing Desk Guide can be found at https://www.gsa.gov/real-estate/real-estate-services/rental-policy-procedures/rent-pricing-policy, and NBSAP Guide at https://www.gsa.gov/real-estate/design-construction/spatial-data-management/national-business-space-assignment-policy.

B. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

There are two types of Reference Materials. The first type is project-specific pre-planning documents, studies, and information. The second type is the Standards and Criteria Documents, both types of information are included in Section V.

Conflicts or ambiguities within or among the referenced standards and criteria documents, or any deviations from requirements contained in the standards and criteria documents, must be reported to the GSA in writing, for determination as to applicability.

In the event of conflicts, the more stringent requirements shall be followed.

1. APPLICABILITY

The Contractor shall review, become familiar with, and fully comply in all materials terms with the Reference Materials listed in Section V. The Government will use the References Materials to determine whether the Contractor’s work complies with the contract requirements. The Contractor shall provide all services in accordance with the version of the Reference Materials current at the time of contract award.

If a requirement contained in the Reference Materials exceeds that required by the P- 100, the Contractor shall comply with the most stringent requirement unless otherwise directed by the CO. The Contractor’s work may exceed requirements contained in the Reference Materials to accomplish programmatic and functional goals for the project, including but not limited to energy performance, sustainability, or industry best practices.

However, that being stated, the Contractor is still responsible for complying with other portions of the contract, including FAR 52.236-22 (Design within Funding Limitations).

2. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA DOCUMENTS

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Standards and Criteria Documents consist mainly of GSA-issued or tenant agency-issued policies, and requirements, as well as industry codes and standards. All Standards and Criteria Documents are requirements for the project.

C. PROJECT DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS

1. DESIGN EXCELLENCE

This is a Design Excellence project, which includes several design excellence peer reviews, involving the Contractor, GSA regional and national office staff, professional private peers serving on the behalf of the GSA, CMa and CxA. GSA’s Design Excellence program requires the contractor to participate in project peer reviews. Peer reviews invite distinguished private-sector peers from the GSA Public Buildings Service Commissioner’s National Register of Peer Professionals to assist GSA in the professional critique of the project design. The Contractor’s lead designer and Design Team presents the project design and the peers provide suggestions and recommendations consistent with the project objectives and program. The Design Excellence process shall include a minimum of three reviews during the design phase, two of the reviews will occur during the Concept Development phase and one review during the Design Development phase.

The broad objective of these reviews is to have discussions among professionals that focus on design, not only as it impacts issues of program requirements, function, form, and detail, but also as it affects building performance and project delivery. These conversations can address general design strategies as well as more specific topics such as materials and building systems.

The first design peer review will occur as a part of the Phase II evaluation of the RFP submissions. This review will not require the active participation by the Contractor.

The second peer review will occur after award of the contract and is intended to refine the design prior to the Final Concept Design Submission. After the final concept design submission and review, the project shall be submitted for review approval by the GSA’s PBS Commissioner before progressing into design development. Representatives of the contractor team, such as the lead designer and selected A/E design team members, shall attend the Commissioner’s Concept Presentation, held at GSA’s Office of Design and Construction in Washington, DC, and present the concept design with other supporting project materials as necessary.

The final design peer review will occur mid-way through the design development phase and will focus primarily on space planning, building finishes and interior systems.

For additional information related to the Design Excellence Program, refer to https://www.gsa.gov/real-estate/design-construction/design-excellence/design-excellence-program.

2. CONSTRUCTION EXCELLENCE

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The GSA Construction Excellence program provides guidance to the GSA construction projects through collaboration with leaders of the private sector construction community.

This partnership allows for the development and implementation of innovative approaches to project management that will provide the Federal government with the highest quality construction.

Construction Excellence in the Design Stage: Includes managing the design process to ensure that the project remains within the contracted budget by selecting systems and materials that maximize performance and operability, facilitating timely design communications utilizing a web-based project management system (ePM), and leveraging the Contractor and the CMa construction and budget control expertise.

Construction Excellence in the Construction Stage: Includes managing the construction to ensure that the project remains within the established budget, conducting Project Delivery Team partnering sessions, facilitating timely construction communications utilizing a web-based project management system (ePM), performing construction peer reviews, and encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution methods to resolve disputes.

GSA construction excellence program provides guidance concerning quality, maintaining scope and budget and meeting schedule deadlines during construction. A series of meetings, usually at the 15%, 50%, and 80% stages of the construction effort, are facilitated by a GSA Central Office representative to give the benefit of their experience in making observations about the project. The Contractor shall participate in these meetings.

A typical meeting entails a tour of the project, followed by interviews with the Contractor and GSA, and to hear the questions raised by and the opinions expressed by the peers.

A GSA Central Office representative shall facilitate each meeting, and at the completion of the day, shall express verbally and later in writing, opinions of all present as well as a recommendation for resolution of issues.

For additional information related to the Construction Excellence program, refer to https://www.gsa.gov/real-estate/design-construction/construction-excellence.

3. ART IN ARCHITECTURE (AiA) PROGRAM Art in Architecture will be a component of this project and may consist of a new AiA commission, restoration of existing fine art, or a combination of both.

The GSA Art in Architecture program entails commissioning artists to create publicly scaled and permanently installed works of art that are appropriate to the diverse uses and architectural vocabulary of new and substantially modernized federal buildings and courthouses. This project will include the commissioning of one or more artists to create and install artwork under separate contract with GSA. The program requires the active participation and support of the AE.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The AE lead designer (or designee) will participate in at least three (3) meetings with other members of an expert art in architecture panel convened by the GSA to make recommendations regarding the artwork to be incorporated into the project. The primary roles of the panel are: to nominate and consider artist candidates through individual recommendations and evaluations; to develop a short list of finalists from which the GSA will select the project artist(s); and to review and provide critiques of the final concept(s) presented by the commissioned artist(s) for artistic merit, feasibility of fabrication and installation, and long-term maintainability.

Upon award of the GSA Art in Architecture contract, the AE will participate in subsequent meetings with the artist(s) as necessary to assure the successful integration of the commissioned artwork in the AE's design and construction documents. This may include but is not limited to architectural and engineering design physical space, structural systems, sitework, utilities, lighting, infrastructure, etc to support the commissioned art.

4. ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY

The Contractor shall use an integrated design process to meet or exceed the performance requirements for energy and sustainability and provide a design that will achieve the goals for the construction of a high-performing green building as set forth in the contract documents. In addition, the Contractor shall provide a design that minimizes the amount of energy required to operate the building.

The primary performance requirements relating to energy and sustainability are found in Section 5.4 “Whole Building Energy Performance Requirements” of the P100, which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

a. The completed building shall comply with the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005 (EISA 2007) requirement that the predicted energy performance meets or exceeds 30% energy consumption savings as compared to ASHRAE 90.1.

b. The Contractor shall follow the ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G- Building Performance Rating Method, which provides specific guidance on the rules and procedures to simulate building energy use.

c. The design shall meet 65% fossil fuel-generated energy consumption savings as compared to ASHRAE 90.1 and Appendix G thereto (note that this is different from the energy cost savings required for LEED credits). The design shall meet or exceed fossil fuel reduction requirements mandated by Section 433 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). If the Contractor is unable to achieve the mandate contained in EPAct, the Contractor shall provide the CO with: (1) documentation to establish the highest level of estimated energy savings for the proposed design; and (2) documentation to establish why EPAct cannot be satisfied.

d. Guiding Principles Checklist (GPC):

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

In February 2016, and in accordance with Executive Order 13696 (Planning for Federal Sustainability in the Next Decade, March 19, 2015), the Council on Environmental Quality issued the Guiding Principles for Sustainable Federal Buildings and Associated Instructions (the Guiding Principles). Each agency subject to EO 13696 (including GSA) is responsible for evaluating which of its buildings comply with the Guiding Principles, and ensuring that sufficient evidence and documentation is readily available to demonstrate compliance with the Guiding Principles for those buildings. (As set forth below, GSA uses a Guiding Principles Checklist, provided in Section V, subsection D) to track and report its new construction and major modernization projects’ compliance with the Guiding Principles. The GPCs are only required for these two project types, which either construct or significantly expand structures, or replace nearly all major building systems. GSA makes no warranties or guarantees regarding the Checklist and, thus, the Contractor should not rely on or use the Checklist as a source for determining mandatory design requirements. That stated, in developing the design submissions, the Contractor should refer to the Checklist and be prepared to articulate, via GSA’s web-based gBUILD database described below, how GPC requirements are being met by the project’s design and construction, and why certain requirements, if any, cannot be met (e.g., because not applicable or not life-cycle-cost effective (as those terms as described in the Guiding Principles)).

e. Energy Modeling and Performance:

The Contractor shall develop an energy model to predict the annual energy consumption of the building. (Note that the energy model is different from the energy cost savings required for LEED credits.) The Contractor shall utilize the BIM model to serve as the basis of the energy model. See BIM Guide 05 for detailed requirements. The energy model shall integrate energy-related information and criteria from other sections of the SOW that may affect energy savings. In developing the energy model, the following definitions, assumptions, and conditions shall apply:

i. Baseline Building: The baseline building is based on the minimum requirements set forth by ASHRAE / IESNA Standard 90.1-2019 and Appendix G thereto. (Note that this is not the Energy Cost Budget Method used by ASHRAE for standard code compliance calculations.)

ii. Proposed Building: The building designed by the Contractor.

iii. Simulations: The simulations shall be modeled with an 8,760 hour program in accordance with ASHRAE 90.1-2019.

iv. Updates: The Contractor shall calculate the annual energy usage and

Energy Use Intensity, in kBTU/GSF/year, at each phase of the design process from concept submittal through final construction documents.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

v. As-Built Conditions: During the construction phase, the Contractor shall update the energy model to as-built conditions.

vi. Ownership: The Government’s rights to the model are set forth in the applicable FAR/GSAR clauses incorporated into the contract.

vii. The Contractor’s Energy Modeler shall coordinate with the CMa Energy Engineer.

f. LEED/SITES Certifications:

The Contractor shall design the project to achieve, at a minimum, a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Version 4 Gold rating and a Sustainable Sites Certification Program (SITES™) silver rating.

The Contractor shall register the project and achieve for certification with the U.S.

Green Building Council (USGBC) for LEED® and SITES™. The Contractor shall pay all fees associated with registering, applying for, appealing, and otherwise obtaining LEED and SITES certifications. The contractor shall list the U.S.

General Services Administration as the owner. The project shall be listed as Non-Confidential.

The Contractor shall:

Take the lead role in coordinating all activities of the various contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and stakeholders associated with the project to maximize the ability to achieve the required LEED and SITES certifications;

i. Provide all services reasonably necessary to obtain the SITES and LEED® certification levels;

ii. Review, prepare, collect, and otherwise assemble all documentation needed to support the SITES and LEED® certification submission, including reviewing, analyzing, preparing, and processing any appeals relating to the denial of any credit(s).

The Contractor shall not submit any documentation to USGBC without first obtaining the written approval of the CO.

In preparing the design, the Contractor shall use its professional judgment in deciding how to best design the project to acquire enough credits to achieve the required LEED and SITES certification. That being stated, in deciding which credits to incorporate into the design, the Contractor shall also be cognizant of and consider, among others, the overall scope and nature of the project; the goals of GSA, its tenant agency(s), and the mission of the tenant agency(s);

location of the project; and the studies, analysis, and other documents included or attached to this SOW. The Contractor shall submit all possible credits to USGBC, even those more than the required minimum certifications.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Contractor shall maintain a complete, accurate, and updated SITES and LEED® rating checklist throughout the project and, in addition, include a copy of same at each design submission.

The Contractor shall provide the CO with a milestone schedule for various submissions required by USGBC. Those milestones might include, but not be limited to, the initial registration; various design stages; various construction stages; commissioning; and post-occupancy. The milestone schedule shall include a requirement that the Contractor submit documentation to USGBC to obtain a final LEED® rating one year following Substantial Completion (as determined by the CO).

g. GSA High Performance Building Tracking gBUILD:

GSA utilizes an online system called the Green Building Upgrade Information Lifecycle Database (gBUILD) to centrally track and report sustainability information for its design and construction program. One of the main purposes of the gBUILD system is to track, document, and otherwise demonstrate compliance with the Guiding Principles (E.O. 13693).

The Contractor shall input information into gBUILD at the following four milestones:

i. Final Design Concept Submission (after DB Award)

ii. 35% Design Development Submission

iii. Pre-Final Construction Documents Submission

iv. Substantial Completion

v. Required information for projects includes: scope/technology details;

anticipated energy and water performance; and total/diverted tons of construction and demolition waste at substantial completion. For new construction and major modernization projects, the Contractor shall also input information into gBUILD to record compliance with the Guiding Principles Checklist described above.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .