Solicitation 47PD0224R0014 Amendment 0004.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Altmeyer Building Column Repair -- Woodlawn, MD
Solicitation number
47PD0224R0014
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for structural repair work on five basement columns in the Altmeyer Building at the Social Security Administration's Woodlawn campus in Maryland. The project involves repairing and strengthening the columns using shoring, jackets, and confining straps to prevent further corrosion. Impacted utilities near the columns such as boiler, electrical, plumbing and fire protection systems will be demolished, relocated, removed and reinstalled, or permanently moved. The General Services Administration is the contracting agency. The response due date for phase one technical proposals was January 23, 2024.

View the file

Other files

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

3PQ1SV

Stephen Kohri, Contracting Officer

SSA Altmeyer / Central Utility Plant Column Repair Construction. Please see attached.

3PQ1SV

GSA ACQUISITION SVCS SOUTH-VIRGINIA SECTION

100 S INDEPENDENCE MALL W

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-2320 USA

GSA ACQUISITION SVCS SOUTH-VIRGINIA SECTION

100 S INDEPENDENCE MALL W

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-2320 USA

EQ3PSS-24-0003

47PD0224R0014

1 20

1/3/2024

12/1/2023

RFP NUMBER: 47PD0224R0014

PROJECT TITLE: SSA Altmeyer Basement Column Repairs, Woodlawn, MD

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ISSUE DATE: 12/4/2023

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DUE DATE: 1/23/2024.

1. The proposal due date and time remains unchanged at 1/23/2024. The delivery method remains unchanged.

2. Attached and incorporated into the solicitation are the answers to RFI’s 1-35. *Please note, RFI’s submitted in regard to Phase 2 will be answered in Phase 2. Some questions deemed appropriate to answer in Phase 1 have been included.

3. Attached for your reference is an example staffing matrix. *Please note, offerors are not required to submit their staffing matrix in this format.

4. Attached and incorporated into the solicitation is the 95% Hazardous Materials Report.

5. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

6. Offerors are required to acknowledge this amendment and all other amendments in their proposals.

RFI Log 1/03/2024 RFI # Date of Question Company Contact Document Reference Question Answer

1 12/8/23 Edifice Services JV, LLC

Austin Hayslett, a.hayslett@hsubuilders.com Solicitation, Page 5, II.A, Proposal Contents

Please confirm whether the GSA Form 527, Representations and Certifications, and Bid Bond should be submitted with the technical proposal in Phase I or the Price Proposal in Phase II.

GSA Form 527, C301 Representations and Certifications, and Bid Bond should be submitted with the Phase 2 Price Proposal.

2 12/8/23 Edifice Services JV, LLC

Austin Hayslett, a.hayslett@hsubuilders.com

Solicitation, Page 10, II.D, "Construciton Projects valued at approximately $9 Million or Higher"

Will the government consider lowering the value requirement to $8 Million or more in order to allow for more offerors to qualify?

Revising the value to $8M is acceptable.

Changed in Amendment 0001.

3 12/8/23 Edifice Services JV, LLC

Austin Hayslett, a.hayslett@hsubuilders.com

Solicitation, Page 10, II.D, "Factor 2: Prior Experience on Relevant Projects"

Given the specialized nature of this project, may offeror's use the experience of subcontractors for this requirement?

No, prior experence must be from projects the general contractor performed.

4 12/8/23 Edifice Services JV, LLC

Austin Hayslett, a.hayslett@hsubuilders.com

Solicitation, Page 10, II.D.iii Factor 3: Past Performance on Relevant Projects

May offerors submit CPARS for this factor in lieu of a PPQ?

No. PPQ's are required for the submission of Factor 3. GSA pulls CPARS reports internally.

5 12/11/2023 Edifice Services JV, LLC

Austin Hayslett, a.hayslett@hsubuilders.com

Solicitation, Page 10, II.D, Factor 2: Prior Experience on Relevant Projects, "Reached substantial completion within the last 10 years".

Will the government consider extending the substantial completion date to 11 years? No. To remain at 10 years.

6 12/11/2023 Edifice Services JV, LLC

Austin Hayslett, a.hayslett@hsubuilders.com

Solicitation, Page 3, I.A The Solicitation and the Contract."

Will the government be incorporating FAR 19.1307: Price Evaluation preference for HUBZone small business concerns in its evaluation?

7 12/11/23 Edifice Services JV, LLC

Austin Hayslett, a.hayslett@hsubuilders.com

Solicitation, Page 6, II.B, "Upon completion of the evaluation of the Phase I technical proposals, an advisory shortlist will be developed. All offerors will be notified as to whether their firm was included on or excluded from the advisory shortlist. Exclusion from the advisory shortlist will not preclude offerors from submitting a Phase II price proposal."

Please clarify on the benefit to being on the advisory shortlist after phase I, if all offerors from Phase I will be able to submit price proposals for Phase II.

Offerors on the advisory shortlist are the firms that the Government deems most likely to receive the award after Phase 1 Technical proposals are reviewed and evaluated. The purpose of the adivsory shortlist is to provide the offerors with information on the liklihood of award that each firm can use to determine if it's in their best interest and worth it to move forward in Phase II. Exclusion from the advisory shortlist shall not preclude offerors from submitting a Phase II price proposal.

8 12/22/23 Edifice Services JV, LLC

Austin Hayslett, a.hayslett@hsubuilders.com

Solicitation, Page 8, "Organization Chart, Staffing Matrix, and Resumes of Key Personne - Provide an expanded organiztion chart and staffing matrix to include key personnel...l"

Please elaborate on what is required to be shown in the staffing matrix.

The staffing matrix provided the amount of time each proposed staff member will work on the project. See attached example

See FAR 19.1307(b)(2). This is applicable to full and open procurements, not Small Business Set-Asides like this procurement.

Since all other firms proposing will be Small Businesses, the 10% markup will not be applied to any offerors.

9 12/8/23 EnviroVantage Joe Gross

Dwg S-001, Structural Demolition (Excluding Concrete Repairs) (G) --Spec 017320-3, 1.5 Project Conditions (G)(1) --Spec 024119-3, 1.9 Field Conditions (D)

Dwg S-001 states that according to the HAZMAT report contained in the project specs, ACM was/was not identified. Spec 017320 states that HAZMATs are present and the HAZMAT report is included elsewhere in the Contract Documents.

Spec 024119 states that HAZMATs are not expected to be encountered. There are numerous other HAZMAT references in the Specifications. We could not locate the HAZMAT report. Please provide report and confirm whether HAZMATs are present and abatement required.

Hazmats are present and abatement is required. Hazmat shown on sheet HM-001 of the drawings. Report to be provided.

10 12/19/23 Restoration East, LLC dsurgan@restorationeast.com

Specifications (pg.16) 012400 - 1 Section 3.1.B & Drawings - G-003: Basis of Design Note 1. and 11.

Please confirm that Bid Option 2 refers to repairs associated AS-35

This specification section has been revised in the 95% and 100% submission and this section has been deleted.

11 12/19/23 Restoration East, LLC dsurgan@restorationeast.com Drawings (pg. 35-37) S-453 thru S-455

Please confirm that detail 3 on each of these pages are not intended to be performed on AU-37

AU-37 does not require shoring for repair.

12 12/19/23 Restoration East, LLC dsurgan@restorationeast.com Site Walk Presentation

Is AR-37 expected to require a concrete jacket and/or shoring if included in this project?

This column is being investigated. The extend of the repair is not know at this time.

It will be included in the 100% construction documents issued for pricing.

13 12/18/23 Kimball Construction Lewis Kimball GSA Solicitation 47PD0224R0014 Item l.B.(3) SF 1442 is not included in the solicitation documents on the Sam website

The SF1442 is to be submitted in Phase 2 Price Proposal as the bid sheet. All amendments in Phase 1 should be acknowledged in the Phase 1 submission.

14 12/18/23 Kimball Construction Lewis Kimball GSA Solicitation 47PD0224R0014

Documents to be submitted with the Technical Proposal are unclear.

There are currently no other document required other than the documents listed in the Solicitation.

15 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Factor 1: Project Management Plan and Approach

Can we use the same subcontractor for multiple trades? If so, can the projects be the same?

Yes the same subcontractor can be used and same projects provided.

16 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Factor 2: Prior Experience

Along with asking for total contract value, this factor asks for “Dollar value of the Offeror’s effort on the project.” Please clarify what “dollar value of the Offeror’s effort on the project” means here

17 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Factor 2: Prior Experience Can we use a teaming partner’s experience for factor 2: Prior Experience? Yes

18 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Factor 2: Prior Experience Can we use major subcontractor experience for Factor 2: Prior Experience?

No, prior experence must be from projects the general contractor performed.

19 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Factor 2: Prior Experience Please clarify if the project value requirement is $8 Million or higher or is it $9 Million or higher?

Please see response to RFI #2.

20 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Factor 3: Past Performance Can we submit a completed CPAR/PPQ for past performance instead of the attached form?

Please see response to RFI #4.

Other documents as required?

Amount of work self performed by offeror.

21 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Factor 3: Past Performance

“For projects in Factor 2 - that are used for both the prime contractor and the A/E firm, a Past Performance Evaluation Survey will be required for each firm for the one project.” But there is no other mention of requiring A/E firm information to be submitted. Please clarify what requirements there are that would require an A/E firm to submit a PPQ

A/E firm text should be deleted.

22 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Please provide any employee access restrictions such as background checks or citizenship requirements.

All personnel will be required to have or obtain a HSPD-12 badge.

23 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Please confirm there will be a second site visit once 100% design documents are developed and prior to pricing.

Confirmed, there will be another site visit prior to submitting pricing.

24 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com

What is the anticipated average high temperature inside the boiler room during the summer? What is the highest temperature to be expected?

Approximately 120 degrees. As part of the project a new exhaust system is being installed to lower the room temperature.

25 12/22/23 Structural Engineering Group, Inc.

rchamel@seg-inc.com Will there be onsite parking for all crew members? Yes

26 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase I - Technical Proposal Please provide copy of the power point presented at the 12/19/2023 site visit

Please see Amendment 002 published 12/20/2023.

27 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase I - Technical Proposal Please provide copy of the site visit sign-in sheet

Please see Amendment 002 published 12/20/2023.

28 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase I - Technical Proposal Please provide any employee access restrictions such as: citizenship, background checks, etc.

All personnel will be required to have or obtain a HSPD-12 badge.

29 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase I - Technical Proposal Can the oral presentation, if necessary, be done Virtually. MS Team Meetings or Zoom.

If a oral presentation is deemed necessary it will be held in-person at GSA Phila office

30 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase II - Pricing Please confirm there will be a second round of RFI's able to be submitted prior to submission of phase II pricing.

Confirmed

31 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase II - Pricing When is the anticipated start of construction? April or May 2024

32 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase II - Pricing TBD

33 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase II - Pricing Please confirm the date of release of the the advisory shortlist to be developed after the evaluation of Phase I.

There is no specific date set on the release of the advisory shortlist

34 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase II - Pricing How is the contractor not included in the advisory shortlist be evaluated?

All contractors will be evaluated the same.

The advisory shortlist just provides the offerors with information on the liklihood of receiving the award that each firm can use to determine if it's in their best interest and worth their time and resources to move forward in Phase II

35 12/19/23 QCM Inc Roberto Malespin Phase II - Pricing Is there a Wage Scale for this project.

Please provide

The Wage Determination will be issued in Phase II

Please confirm due date for the Phase II pricing proposal

RFP Attachment -- Template Staffing Plan

Attachment 18: Initial Staffing Plan*

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Quarter 5 Quarter 6 Quarter 7 Quarter 8 Quarter 9 Quarter 10 Quarter 11 Quarter 12Phase:

Key Staff Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Additional Staff Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Phase:

Key Staff Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Additional Staff Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Phase:

Key Staff Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Additional Staff Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Hours % Time On-site

% Time Off-site

Project Planning

Key Staff Role 1 Name Key Staff Role 2 Name Key Staff Role 3 Name

Staff Role 1 Name Staff Role 2 Name Staff Role 3 Name

Analysis and Design

Key Staff Role 1 Name Key Staff Role 2 Name Key Staff Role 3 Name

Staff Role 1 Name Staff Role 2 Name Staff Role 3 Name

Implementation

Key Staff Role 1 Name Key Staff Role 2 Name Key Staff Role 3 Name

Staff Role 1 Name Staff Role 2 Name Staff Role 3 Name

Estimate the total effort hours contributed by each of the key personnel, as well as any required additional staff, by project phase from project start through implementation.

Duplicate columns and rows as necessary.

* Notes:

CUI

Controlled by: GSA Region 3

POC: Paul McIntyre, PMP

Telephone: (215) 446-4712

CUI

Altmeyer Columns Full Repair Design

Altmeyer

Woodlawn, MD

General Services Administration

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REPORT

95 Percent Submission

5 December 2023

Contract Number: 47PD0322D0008

Order Number: 47PD0223F0076

Our Ref: 214.029

7900 Westpark Dr., Suite A405 McLean, VA 22102

Limited Asbestos & Lead Testing

Altmeyer Columns Full Repair Design SSA Woodlawn Complex 6401 Security Boulevard

Summer Ref. 214.029

Prepared for

7900 Westpark Drive

Suite A405 McLean, VA 22102

September 25, 2023

Prepared by

10310-B Baltimore National Pike

Ellicott City, MD 21042

(410) 480-3636

10310-B Baltimore National Pike

Ellicott City, MD 21042

Office: (410) 480-3636

Fax (410) 480-3637

September 25, 2023

Summer Consultants, Inc.

7900 Westpark Drive Suite A405 McLean, VA 22102

Re: Limited Asbestos & Lead Testing

Altmeyer Columns Full Repair Design SSA Woodlawn Complex 6401 Security Boulevard

Gentlemen:

AERO EH&S, Inc. (AERO) is pleased to submit the attached Limited Asbestos & Lead Testing report for the referenced site. The testing included accessible locations specified by the Summer Consultants' Project Engineer during the walkthrough inspections as potentially impacted by the referenced project. The report includes the procedures and methods for testing.

As a result of our review and survey, lead-based paint and paint containing lead were identified. AERO has provided conclusions and recommendations regarding these materials within the report.

AERO appreciates the opportunity to perform limited asbestos and lead testing for Summer Consultants, Inc. Please contact our office if you have any questions.

Sincerely, AERO EH&S, Inc.

S. Michael Derdeyn Michael J. Hentgen CIH CSP Senior Project Manager President

Hazardous Materials Altmeyer Columns Full Repair Design SSA Woodlawn Complex, Woodlawn, MD

LIMITED ASBESTOS & LEAD TESTING

Altmeyer Columns Full Repair Design

SSA Woodlawn Complex 6401 Security Boulevard

Table of Contents

1.0 Purpose and Scope of Service

2.0 Findings

2.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

2.2 Lead-in-Paint

3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

APPENDIX A XRF Testing Results APPENDIX B XRF Reading Location Diagrams

SSA Woodlawn Complex, Woodlawn, MD

LIMITED ASBESTOS & LEAD TESTING

Altmeyer Columns Full Repair Design

SSA Woodlawn Complex 6401 Security Boulevard

1.0 Purpose and Scope of Service

The purpose of this task was to identify and document the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-containing paint on materials anticipated to be impacted by the Altmeyer Columns Full Repair Design project at the SSA Woodlawn Complex in Woodlawn, MD. The survey and review were conducted in accordance with the following scope of work.

Asbestos-Containing Materials

(1) Licensed asbestos inspectors conducted a visual inspection of representative materials suspected to contain asbestos that will be affected by the referenced project. The survey was conducted in general accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AHERA requirements.

(2) Based on field observations, AERO prepared this report regarding the presence and extent of asbestos-containing materials potentially impacted by the project.

Lead-In-Paint

(1) An EPA Lead Paint Inspector trained in sampling protocols and use of the Viken Pb200i X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer (XRF) conducted testing of representative painted surfaces that may be impacted by the planned activities.

(2) Use of the XRF instrument was in general accordance with the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) methodology for the Heuresis Pb200i dated December 1, 2020. XRF instrument calibration checks were performed according to the PCS.

The PCS is provided as supplemental guidance to the US Housing and Urban Development (HUD) “Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing” and is a joint product of HUD and EPA.

(3) Testing locations were identified by substrate type, component, and color.

Surfaces to be tested only included painted building components that may be impacted by the project.

SSA Woodlawn Complex, Woodlawn, MD

(4) Based on field observations, existing data provided by the Client, and results of additional testing, AERO prepared this report regarding the presence and extent of lead-containing paints impacted by this project.

2.0 Findings

2.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The mechanical room in the basement of the Altmeyer Building, where this project is located, was completely abated of asbestos-containing materials. There were no suspect asbestos-containing materials anticipated to be impacted by the scope of this project observed during this survey.

2.2 Lead-in-Paint

AERO conducted a lead-based paint screening survey of representative surfaces and materials to identify lead-based paint that could be disturbed during the performance of work associated with the referenced project. The survey was performed by an EPA certified Lead Risk Assessor trained in sampling protocols and use of the Viken Pb200i X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer (XRF).

The following building components identified during the inspection were suspected of being coated with paint containing lead and may be impacted by the referenced renovation project:

Metal Boiler Cladding Metal Boiler Housing

Metal Boiler Controls Metal Catwalk Handrails

Metal Catwalk Stair Stringers Metal Gas Piping

Metal Gas Valves Metal Gas Pressure Reducer

Concrete Boiler Base Concrete Floor

Concrete Equipment Pads Concrete Columns

Metal Safety Switch Metal Tank Stand

Metal Pump Motor Metal Pump Base

Metal Pump Support Metal Safety Guard

Metal Catwalk Columns Metal Catwalk Ladder

Metal Control Panel Enclosure Metal Pipe Stands

Metal Davit Arms Metal Shut Off

Metal Valves Metal Pressure Cut Offs

Metal “C” Channel Supports

SSA Woodlawn Complex, Woodlawn, MD

XRF testing revealed the following surfaces contained lead concentrations of 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater and are considered to be lead-based paint.

Metal Gas Valves Metal Catwalk Handrails

Metal Davit Arms Metal Safety Guard

XRF testing revealed lead concentrations less than 0.7 mg/cm2, but greater than the limit of detection for the instrument, on the following surfaces and are considered to be lead-containing:

Metal Boiler Cladding Metal Boiler Housing

Metal Boiler Controls Metal Gas Piping

Metal Catwalk Stair Stringers Metal Gas Pressure Reducer

Concrete Boiler Base Concrete Floor

Concrete Equipment Pads Concrete Columns

Metal Safety Switch Metal Tank Stand

Metal Pump Motor Metal Pump Base

Metal Pump Support Metal Catwalk Ladder

Metal Catwalk Columns Metal Pipe Stands

Metal Control Panel Enclosure Metal Shut Off

Metal Valves Metal Pressure Cut Offs

Metal “C” Channel Supports

XRF testing revealed no lead concentrations less than the limit of detection for the instrument used. All surfaces impacted by the scope of this project should be assumed to contain detectable concentrations of lead.

Appendix A contains a spreadsheet with all data obtained from the representative XRF testing, including lead concentrations reported in milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) and a POS (positive) or NEG (negative) classification with respect to the threshold for lead-based paint for each reading. All POS values are indicated in red boldface in the spreadsheet. XRF reading location drawings depicting approximate reading locations are included in Appendix B.

State of Maryland regulations define a lead-based paint as any paint or other surface coating containing lead or lead in its compounds in any quantity greater than 0.50% lead by weight or more than 0.7 mg/cm2. Federal regulations define a lead-based paint as any paint or other surface coating containing lead or lead in its compounds in any quantity greater than 0.50% lead by weight, or more than 1.0 mg/cm2. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates lead present in the work place in any concentration.

SSA Woodlawn Complex, Woodlawn, MD

The OSHA Standard requires an employer to ensure that no employee is exposed to lead at concentrations greater than 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (μg/M3) averaged over an eight-hour period. The Standard further requires the employer to make a determination of its employees' potential exposure to lead. The Standard details presumed exposure levels for various construction activities. The employer must provide adequate personal and respiratory protection to match the presumed exposure listed in the Standard. Deviation from the presumed exposure is typically achieved by performing personal monitoring during various representative construction activities. The level of personal and respiratory protection can then be modified based upon the results of the monitoring.

3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the work conducted for this survey and AERO’s understanding of the project.

A. There were no suspect asbestos-containing materials anticipated to be impacted by the scope of this project identified during this survey.

B. If any suspected asbestos-containing materials are encountered during renovation activities, the materials should be assumed to be asbestos containing until sampling determines otherwise.

C. Lead-based and lead-containing paints were identified during the survey.

Removal of paint with lead as a result of demolition activities does not necessarily constitute a lead-based paint abatement provided they have not been included in the renovation plans to reduce or eliminate a lead hazard.

However, if lead-based paint is removed with the intention of reducing or eliminating a lead hazard, then the removal must be performed by a licensed lead abatement contractor.

D. Painted surfaces identified as being covered with paint containing lead in any concentration should be handled in accordance with the GSA Guide Specification Section 02090 “Lead Based Paint Control Procedures”, SSA OEHOS “Lead Compliance Program”, and 29 CFR 1926.62, the OSHA Lead Exposure in Construction Standard. Contractors should be notified of all known lead-containing paints prior to bidding on work at the Site.

E. Representative demolition waste stream samples should be collected of any non-recyclable waste and submitted for TCLP analysis to determine proper disposal requirements. Should TCLP results reveal lead concentrations of 5 parts per million or higher, the waste stream should be handled and disposed of as hazardous waste.

APPENDIX A

XRF Testing Results

6401 Security Boulevard

Woodlawn, MD

Summer Ref. 214.029

Reading # Date Time User Site Floor Room Color Substrate Component Condition Concentration Units LBP? Result

1 9/12/2023 10:58:47 Dancheko CALIBRATION 0.0 mg/cm2 NEG BDL

2 9/12/2023 10:59:15 Dancheko CALIBRATION 0.0 mg/cm2 NEG BDL

3 9/12/2023 10:59:42 Dancheko CALIBRATION 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

4 9/12/2023 11:00:14 Dancheko CALIBRATION 1.0 mg/cm2 POS LBP

5 9/12/2023 11:00:42 Dancheko CALIBRATION 1.0 mg/cm2 POS LBP

6 9/12/2023 11:01:10 Dancheko CALIBRATION 1.1 mg/cm2 POS LBP

7 9/12/2023 11:07:47 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Boiler #4 Blue Metal Boiler Cladding Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

8 9/12/2023 11:08:42 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Boiler #4 Silver Metal Boiler Housing Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

9 9/12/2023 11:09:38 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Boiler #4 Grey Metal Boiler Controls Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

10 9/12/2023 11:10:39 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Boiler #4 Yellow Metal Catwalk Handrail Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

11 9/12/2023 11:11:48 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Boiler #4 Black Metal Catwalk Stair Stringer Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

12 9/12/2023 11:14:54 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Boiler #4 Blue Metal Boiler Cladding Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

13 9/12/2023 11:16:35 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Boiler #4 Yellow Metal Gas Pipes Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

14 9/12/2023 11:17:37 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Boiler #4 Red Metal Gas Valve Intact 0.7 mg/cm2 POS LBP

15 9/12/2023 11:18:30 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Boiler #4 Blue Metal Gas Pressure Reducer Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

16 9/12/2023 11:19:50 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Boiler #4 Grey Concrete Boiler #4 Base Intact 0.3 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

17 9/12/2023 11:20:41 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Boiler #4 Grey Concrete Floor Intact 0.3 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

18 9/12/2023 11:21:35 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Boiler #4 Yellow Concrete Equipment Pad Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

19 9/12/2023 11:23:12 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AR37 White Concrete Column Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

20 9/12/2023 11:23:55 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AR37 Grey Concrete Column Intact 0.3 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

21 9/12/2023 11:24:47 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AR37 Grey Metal Safety Switch Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

22 9/12/2023 11:25:53 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AR37 Teal Metal Tank Stand Intact 0.3 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

23 9/12/2023 11:26:38 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Teal Metal Pump Motor Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

24 9/12/2023 11:29:44 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Blue Metal Pump Base Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

25 9/12/2023 11:30:24 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Gold Metal Pump Motor Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

26 9/12/2023 11:31:28 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Grey Metal Pump Support Intact 0.4 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

27 9/12/2023 11:32:35 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Yellow Metal Safety Guard Intact 0.9 mg/cm2 POS LBP

28 9/12/2023 11:33:16 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Yellow Metal Safety Guard Intact 2.7 mg/cm2 POS LBP

29 9/12/2023 11:34:31 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS35 Black Metal Catwalk Column Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

30 9/12/2023 11:35:15 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS35 Grey Metal Catwalk Column Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

31 9/12/2023 11:36:10 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS35 Black Metal Catwalk Ladder Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

32 9/12/2023 11:37:55 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AR37 Grey Metal Control Panel Enclosure Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

33 9/12/2023 11:39:46 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Grey Metal Pipe Stand Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

34 9/12/2023 11:41:15 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Yellow Metal Catwalk Handrail Intact 6.4 mg/cm2 POS LBP

35 9/12/2023 11:42:02 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AS37 Grey Metal Catwalk Stair Stringer Intact 0.4 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

36 9/12/2023 11:44:35 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Catwalk Red Metal Davit Arm Intact 0.3 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

37 9/12/2023 11:45:25 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Catwalk Yellow Metal Davit Arm Deteriorated 2.8 mg/cm2 POS LBP

38 9/12/2023 11:47:03 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Catwalk Teal Metal Shut Off Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

39 9/12/2023 11:48:31 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Catwalk Blue Metal Pump Motor Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

BDL = Below Detection Limit

MCL = Material Containing Lead

LBP = Lead-Based Paint

6401 Security Boulevard

Woodlawn, MD

Summer Ref. 214.029

40 9/12/2023 11:49:57 Dancheko Altmeyer M-Mezzanine Catwalk Red Metal Valve Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

41 9/12/2023 11:52:43 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AT37 White Concrete Column Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

42 9/12/2023 11:53:22 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AT37 Grey Concrete Column Intact 0.3 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

43 9/12/2023 11:54:11 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AT37 Grey Metal Pressure Cut Off Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

44 9/12/2023 11:55:00 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AT37 Grey Metal Pipes Intact 0.0 mg/cm2 NEG BDL

45 9/12/2023 11:56:12 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AT37 Grey Metal Pipes Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

46 9/12/2023 11:57:19 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AT37 Grey Metal "C" Channel Support Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

47 9/12/2023 11:58:34 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AU37 White Concrete Column Intact 0.3 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

48 9/12/2023 11:59:17 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AU37 Grey Concrete Column Intact 0.3 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

49 9/12/2023 12:00:05 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AU37 Grey Metal Pressure Cut Off Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

50 9/12/2023 12:01:12 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AU37 Grey Metal Pipes Intact 0.2 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

51 9/12/2023 12:02:13 Dancheko Altmeyer B-Basement Column AU37 Grey Metal "C" Channel Support Intact 0.1 mg/cm2 NEG MCL

52 9/12/2023 12:06:14 Dancheko CALIBRATION 1.0 mg/cm2 POS LBP

53 9/12/2023 12:06:42 Dancheko CALIBRATION 1.0 mg/cm2 POS LBP

54 9/12/2023 12:07:09 Dancheko CALIBRATION 1.0 mg/cm2 POS LBP

55 9/12/2023 12:07:42 Dancheko CALIBRATION 0.0 mg/cm2 NEG bDL

56 9/12/2023 12:08:10 Dancheko CALIBRATION 0.0 mg/cm2 NEG BDL

57 9/12/2023 12:08:37 Dancheko CALIBRATION 0.0 mg/cm2 NEG BDL

BDL = Below Detection Limit

MCL = Material Containing Lead

LBP = Lead-Based Paint

APPENDIX B

XRF Reading Location Diagrams

AUATASAR

AV AWAQ

ALTMEYER BUILDING - BASEMENT

SSA WOODLAWN, MD

XRF READING LOCATIONS

XRF READING LOCATION

READINGS COLLECTED: 9/12/23

31 30

AUATASAR

AV AW

ALTMEYER BUILDING - MEZZANINE

SSA WOODLAWN, MD

XRF READING LOCATIONS

XRF READING LOCATION

READINGS COLLECTED: 9/12/23

10 11

Solicitation Amendment 47PD0224R0014_0004
Continuation page
Phase 1 RFI Log
staffing-matrix-template-01.xlsx - Google Sheets
SSA Altmeyer Columns Full Repair Design_95% Submission - Hazardous Materials Report
Sheets and Views
214.029 Altmeyer Columns-Basement
214.029 Altmeyer Columns-Mezzanine

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .