4-SLCI26095 Attachment 4 Score Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 71 KB Posted Jun 5, 2026

Attached to: Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI26095 - SCADA & Telemetry Consulting and On-Call Services
Solicitation number: SLCI26095
Issued by: Utah

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Jun 8, 2026

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's Solicitation #SLCI26095 for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) & Telemetry Consulting and On-Call Services. The scoresheet is designed to evaluate multiple offerors (up to 20) across five mandatory requirements and three scoreable technical criteria. The mandatory requirements include city ethics compliance, documented experience, criminal background clearance, Generative AI acknowledgement and documentation, and confirmation of 24/7 response capability from key personnel. The evaluation process includes a multi-stage assessment with technical scoring, policy criteria evaluation, interview points, and cost analysis to determine the overall winner.

The technical evaluation comprises 500 possible points distributed across three criteria: the offeror's statement of experience and qualifications (250 points, 50% weight), statement of understanding of the project (100 points, 20% weight), and primary team member's experience and availability (150 points, 30% weight). An additional 25 points are available through policy criteria covering sustainability, disadvantaged business enterprise certification, apprenticeships, and local small business status. Offerors must achieve a minimum of 420 technical points (80% of 525 total technical points) to advance further in the evaluation process. Cost represents 20% of the total evaluation score (131.3 points maximum), with points calculated using a comparative formula where the lowest-cost proposal receives full cost points and other proposals receive proportional points based on their cost relative to the lowest bid. The grand total possible evaluation score is 756.3 points.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf	PDF	Jun 5, 2026
5-SLCI26095 Attachment 1 Sample Agreement.docx	DOCX document	Jun 5, 2026
6-SLCI26095 Attachment 3 Cost Sheet.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jun 5, 2026
3-SLCI26095 Request for Proposals.pdf	PDF	Jun 5, 2026
2-SLCI26095 Attachment 2 Scope of Work.pdf	PDF	Jun 5, 2026

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Score Sheet

SCADA & TELEMETRY CONSULTING AND ON-CALL SERVICES

SOLICITATION #SLCI26095

RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET

	Score will be assigned as follows:
	0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:	1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
	2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:	3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
	4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:	5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.

Minimum Mandatory Requirements		RFP Section	Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1	City Ethics Requirement	Section VII A.i
2	Documented Experience	Section VII A.ii
3	Criminal Background Requirements	Section VII A.iii
4	GenAI Acknowledgement and Documentation	Section VII A.iv
5	Statement confirming key personnel to provide 24/7 response	Section VII A.v

		Scoreable Technical Criteria		RFP Section	Evaluator Score (0-5)	Criteria Weight	% of Tech Criteria	Points Possible	Points
Earned	Minimum Required
		1	Offeror's Statement of Experience & Qualifications	Section VII B.i		50	50.0%	250.0	0.0
		2	Statement of understanding of the project	Section VII B.ii		20	20.0%	100.0	0.0
		3	Primary Team Member's Experience and availability	Section VII B.iii		30	30.0%	150.0	0.0
		Scorable Technical Criteria Total					100.0%	500.0	0.0	0.0

Policy Criteria		RFP Section	Evaluator Score (0-5)	Available Points	Possible Points	Points Earned
1	Sustainability	Attachment 1 IV.C.1		1.25%	6.25	0.00
2	Disadvantaged business enterprise	Attachment 1 IV.C.2		1.25%	6.25	0.00
3	Apprenticeships	Attachment 1 IV.C.3		1.25%	6.25	0.00
4	Local Small Business	Attachment 1 IV.C.4		1.25%	6.25	0.00
Policy Criteria Total				5.00%	25.00	0.00

		Possible Points	Points Earned
Total Technical Points	100.00%	525.00	0.00

Required Technical Point Threshold	RFP Section	Min Percent	Min Points Required	Points Earned	Percent Earned	Evaluation
		80%	420.0	0.0	0.0%

Cost		RFP Section	Low Cost Option	Offered Cost	Percent of Total	Points Possible	Points Earned
			$0.00	$0.00	20%	131.3	ERROR:#DIV/0!
	* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).

Total Evaluation Points	Percent of Total	Points Possible	Points Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points	80%	525.0	0.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points	20%	131.3	ERROR:#DIV/0!
Total Evaluation Points	100%	656.3	ERROR:#DIV/0!

Scoresheet Summary

TITLE OF PROJECT (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)

SOLICITATION # (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)

RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET SUMMARY

Instructions:

Enter the solicitation number and name.

Enter each Offeror name.

Enter the Criteria name for each category.

Enter the Weight in column B that corresponds to the Criteria Weight on the Score Sheet tab column J for each criterion.

Enter the Total Possible Points for each Criterion, Cost Points, and Score Summary section.

Mandatory Minimum Requirements: Evaluate each offer and enter pass or fail

Ensure that the number of evaluator lines matches the number of evaluators.

Offers not meeting the Minimum Mandatory Requirements will not be evaluated further.

Ensure that the Total Average Score formula includes all of the evaluator line items.

Technical Scores: Enter each evaluator score for each offer.

Signatures:	Date:
Evaluator 1	__________________
Evaluator 2	__________________
Evaluator 3	__________________
Evaluator 4	__________________
Evaluator 5	__________________

Minimum Mandatory Requirements

Offeror A

Offeror B

Offeror C

Offeror D

Offeror E

Offeror F

Offeror G

Offeror H

Offeror I

Offeror J

Offeror K

Offeror L

Offeror M

Offeror N

Offeror O

Offeror P

Offeror Q

Offeror R

Offeror S

Offeror T

Weight	Technical Scores	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Criteria #1
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 250)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #2
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 100)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #3
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 150)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = 500)	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!
	Policy Criteria	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
Weight	Technical Scores
	Policy Criteria #1: Sustainability
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0.000	Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 6.25)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Policy Criteria #2: Business Certification
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0.000	Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 6.25)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Policy Criteria #3: Apprenticeship
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0.000	Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 6.25)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Policy Criteria #4: Local Small Business
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0.000	Policy Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 6.25)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Policy Criteria - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 25)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Total Technical Criteria Points (Total Technical Criteria Possible Points = 525) Minimum Threshold = 367.5	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!
20	Stage 3: Interview Points (Total Possible Points = 100)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total Cost Points	Cost Scores	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Cost
131.3	Cost Points	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Score Summary	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Total Technical Points (Total Possible = 525)	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!
	Total Interview Points (Total Possible = 100)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Total Cost Points (Total Possible = 131.3)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Grand Total Points (Total Possible = 756.3)	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!	ERROR:#REF!

image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Jun 8, 2026.