4-B. FY26-RFP-28 WT Valve Rehab Services.pdf

PDF 369 KB Posted

Attached to
Water Treatment Valve Rehabilitation Services
Solicitation number
FY26-RFP-28
Issued by
Mecklenburg County, Charlotte City, North Carolina

About this file

This Request for Proposals is issued by Charlotte Water, a department of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, seeking companies to provide water treatment valve rehabilitation services. Charlotte Water operates the largest water service utility in the Carolinas, serving nearly one million customers throughout Mecklenburg County. The company selected will inspect and rehabilitate industrial valves used along the water intake and distribution lines, including butterfly valves (12 to 120 inches), cone valves (12 to 48 inches), and gate valves (12 to 60 inches). Over the potential five-year contract term (initially three years with two one-year renewal options), approximately 30 butterfly valves, 50 cone valves, and 20 gate valves will be sent for rehabilitation on an as-needed basis, with an estimated one to two butterfly valves, two to three cone valves, and one to two gate valves sent every six months. The RFP was issued on March 16, 2026, with written questions due by March 25, 2026, and proposals due by April 1, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. through the Bonfire Procurement Portal. No pre-proposal conference will be held. Contract award by City Council is anticipated in May 2026, with services commencing in June 2026.

Pricing will remain firm for the initial contract year, with adjustments considered thereafter. The selected company must charge a flat inspection fee per valve analysis, labor at an hourly rate with all preparation and testing work included, parts at a markup not exceeding 15% over the company's documented costs, and transportation fees per trip for valve retrieval and delivery. Overtime rates are not permitted. Payment is rendered only after Charlotte Water witnesses successful testing and receives the valve; no down payments or partial payments are made. The company must perform all rehabilitation work at its own location and is responsible for transporting valves to and from multiple Charlotte Water facilities. All rehabilitated valves must meet "Like-New Condition" standards and include an 18-month warranty against defects in materials and workmanship. The company must comply with the Charlotte Business INClusion Program requirements and submit the required MWSBE Utilization Form to be deemed responsive. Evaluation criteria include qualifications and experience, project approach and proposed solution, cost effectiveness and value, and acceptance of contract terms.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

WATER TREATMEN T VALVE

REH A BIL ITATION S ERV ICES

RF P # F Y- 26-RF P- 28

CITY OF CH ARLOT TE

N ORTH CAROLIN A

MA RCH 16, 2026

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

RFP # FY26-RFP-28

WATER TREATMENT VALVE REHABILITATION SERVICES

MARCH 16, 2026

Charlotte Water, a department of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, is now accepting Proposals for Water Treatment Valve Rehabilitation Services. The requirements for submitting a Proposal are stated in the attached Request for Proposals (the “RFP”). Please review them carefully.

Charlotte Water is using the Bonfire City of Charlotte e-Procurement Portal (“Procurement Portal” -https://charlottenc.bonfirehub.com) to accept and evaluate proposals for this RFP. Proposals must be submitted electronically through the Procurement Portal on or before the Due Date in order to be accepted.

Each Company is solely responsible for the timely delivery of their Proposal. Companies accept all risks of late delivery regardless of fault. In addition, Companies accept all risks if file is corrupted, incorrect, incomplete, or not attached. Any Proposal received after the date and time specified, regardless of the mode of delivery, shall not be considered.

A Pre-Proposal Conference for this RFP will not be held.

The City is an equal opportunity purchaser.

Sincerely, Wendy Raiford Procurement Officer https://charlottenc.bonfirehub.com/

Checklist for submitting a Proposal:

Step 1 Read the document fully.

Step 2 Review the solicitation timeline and upcoming events in the Procurement Portal and download copies of any documents if you plan to submit a Proposal.

Step 3 Submit any questions via the Procurement Portal by the deadline(s) noted for the solicitation.

Step 4 Conduct a thorough review of the Sample Contract. Any exceptions to the Sample Contract must be uploaded in word format (with redlines/tracked changes).

Step 5 Monitor the Procurement Portal for any addendums and/or responses to questions.

If you plan to submit a Proposal, you must submit all required documents and respond to all questions within the Procurement Portal for the RFP.

If awarded a contract, your company will be required to provide an insurance certificate(s) that meets or exceeds the requirements set forth in the Sample Contract.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. OBJECTIVE

1.2. DEFINITIONS

1.3. ACCURACY OF RFP AND RELATED DOCUMENTS

1.4. CITY’S RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

1.5. EXPENSE OF SUBMITTAL PREPARATION

1.6. PROPOSAL CONDITIONS

2. PROCUREMENT PROCESS

2.1. SCHEDULE AND PROCESS

2.2. INTERPRETATIONS AND ADDENDA

2.3. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

2.4. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

2.5. CORRECTION OF ERRORS

2.6. EVALUATION

2.7. CONTRACT AWARD BY CITY COUNCIL. (ANTICIPATED)

2.8. VENDOR INCLUSION

3. SCOPE OF WATER TREATMENT VALVE REHABILITATION SERVICES

3.1. BACKGROUND

3.2. GENERAL SCOPE

3.3. WORK LOCATION AND TRANSPORTATION OF VALVES

3.4. COST ESTIMATES

3.5. VALVE REHABILITATION REQUIREMENTS

3.6. CITY’S OBSERVATION DURING TESTING

3.7. WARRANTY AND GUARANTEE

3.8. PRICING

4. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND FORMAT

4.1. PROPOSAL CONTENT

5. PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

5.2. PROJECT APPROACH AND PROPOSED SOLUTION

5.3. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND VALUE

5.4. ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT

Section 1 Introduction and General Information

1. INTRODUCTION.

1.1. Objective.

The objective of this RFP is to solicit Proposals that will enable the City to determine which Company and Proposed Solution will best meet the City’s needs for the Services detailed in the Scope of Work.

1.2. Definitions.

As used in this RFP, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:

Acceptance: Refers to receipt and approval by the City of a Deliverable or Service in accordance with the acceptance process and criteria in the Contract.

Affiliates: Refers to all departments or units of the City and all other governmental units, boards, committees or municipalities for which the City processes data or performs services.

Charlotte Business INClusion/CBI: Refers to the Charlotte Business INClusion office of the City of

Charlotte.

Charlotte Business INClusion Policy/ CBI Policy: Refers to the policy adopted by City Council, which seeks to enhance competition in contracting and procurement opportunities for MWSBEs located in the Charlotte Combined Statistical Area.

Charlotte Combined Statistical Area: Refers to the area consisting of the North Carolina counties of Anson, Cabarrus, Cleveland, Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Stanly, and Union, and the South Carolina counties of Chester, Lancaster, and York;

a criterion used by Charlotte Business INClusion to determine eligibility to participate in the program.

City: Refers to the City of Charlotte, North Carolina.

City Project Manager: Refers to a specified City employee representing the City’s best interests in this Project.

Company: During the solicitation process, refers to a company that has interest in providing the Services. After the solicitation process, refers to a company that has been selected by the City to provide the Services.

Company Project Manager: Refers to a specified Company employee representing the best interests of the Company for this Project.

Contract: Refers to a written agreement executed by the City and the Company for all or part of the Services.

Deliverables: Refers to all tasks, reports, information, designs, plans, and other items that the Company is required to deliver to the City in connection with the Contract.

Department: Refers to a department within the City of Charlotte.

Documentation: Refers to all written, electronic, or recorded works that describe the use, functions, features, or purpose of the Deliverables or Services or any component thereof, and which are provided to the City by the Company or its subcontractors, including without limitation all end user manuals, training manuals, guides, program listings, data models, flow charts, and logic diagrams.

Evaluation Committee: Refers to a City-appointed committee that will evaluate Proposals and identify the Company(-ies) best meeting the needs of the City.

Like-New Condition: Refers to a physical and mechanical condition equivalent to how the valve(s) and/or its components were originally manufactured to operate. Also referred to as “Like-New.”

Minority-owned Business Enterprise/ MBE: Refers to a business enterprise that: (i) is certified by the State of North

Carolina as a Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) within the meaning of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-128.4; (ii) is at least fifty-one percent (51%) owned by one (1) or more persons who are members of one of the following groups: African American or Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American or American Indian; and (iii) has significant business presence in the Charlotte Combined Statistical Area.

MWSBE: Refers to SBEs, MBEs, and WBEs, collectively.

MWSBE Goal: If an RFP or Contract has separate Subcontracting Goals for MBEs, WBEs, and/or SBEs, the term MWSBE is a shorthand way to refer collectively to all MBE, WBE, and SBE Goals set for the RFP. In some instances, the City may set one (1) combined goal for MBEs, WBEs, and/or SBEs, in which event the term MWSBE Goal refers to that one (1) combined goal. In the latter instance, calculated as a percentage, the MWSBE Goal represents the total dollars spent with MBEs, WBEs, and SBEs as a portion of the total Proposal amount, including any contingency.

Project: Refers to the City’s need for a company to provide Water Treatment Valve Rehabilitation Services for the City.

Proposal: Refers to the proposal submitted by a Company for the Services as outlined in this RFP.

Services: Refers to the Water Treatment Valve Rehabilitation Services as requested in this RFP.

Small Business Enterprise/SBE: Refers to a business enterprise that is certified by the City of Charlotte under

Part E of the CBI Policy as meeting all of the requirements for SBE certification.

Specifications and Requirements: Refers to all definitions, descriptions, requirements, criteria, warranties, and performance standards relating to the Deliverables and Services that are set forth or referenced in: (i) this RFP, including any addenda; (ii) the Documentation; and (iii) any functional and/or technical specifications that are published or provided by the Company or its licensors or suppliers from time to time with respect to all or any part of the Deliverables or Services.

Subcontracting Goal: Refers to a SBE, MBE, WBE, and/or MWSBE Goal established by the City for an RFP and resulting Contract.

Trade Secrets: Information of the City or any of its suppliers, contractors or licensors that:

(i) derives value from being secret; and (ii) the owner has taken reasonable steps to keep confidential. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-152 et seq. Examples of trade secrets include information relating to proprietary software, new technology, new products or services, flow charts or diagrams that show how things work, manuals that tell how things work and business processes and procedures.

Woman-owned Business Enterprise/ WBE: Refers to a business enterprise that: (i) is certified by the State of North

Carolina as a Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) within the meaning of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-128.4; (ii) is at least fifty-one percent (51%) owned by one or more persons who are female; and (iii) has significant business presence in the Charlotte Combined Statistical Area.

Work Product: Refers to the Deliverables and all other programs, algorithms, reports, information, designs, plans and other items developed by the Company in connection with this RFP, and all partial, intermediate or preliminary versions of any of the foregoing.

1.3. Accuracy of RFP and Related Documents.

Each Company must independently evaluate all information provided by the City. The City makes no representations or warranties regarding any information presented in this RFP, or otherwise made available during this procurement process, and assumes no responsibility for conclusions or interpretations derived from such information. In addition, the City will not be bound by or be responsible for any explanation or conclusions regarding this RFP or any related documents other than those provided by an addendum issued by the City. Companies may not rely on any oral statement by the City or its agents, advisors, or consultants.

If a Company identifies potential errors or omissions in this RFP or any other related documents, the Company should immediately notify the City of such potential discrepancy in writing. The City may issue a written addendum if the City determines clarification necessary. Each Company requesting an interpretation will be responsible for submitting them per Section 2.2.

1.4. City’s Rights and Options.

The City reserves the right, at the City’s sole discretion, to take any action affecting this RFP, this RFP process, or the Services or facilities subject to this RFP that would be in the best interests of the City, including:

1.4.1. To supplement, amend, substitute, or otherwise modify this RFP, including the schedule, at any time;

1.4.2. To cancel this RFP with or without the substitution of another RFP;

1.4.3. To require one or more Companies to supplement, clarify or provide additional information in order for the City to evaluate the Proposals submitted

1.4.4. To investigate the qualifications, experience, capabilities, and financial standing of each Company submitting a Proposal;

1.4.5. To waive any defect or irregularity in any Proposal received;

1.4.6. To reject any or all Proposals;

1.4.7. To share the Proposals with City employees other than the Evaluation Committee or City advisory committees as deemed necessary;

1.4.8. To award all, none, or any part of the Services and enter into Contracts with one or more of the responding Companies deemed by the City to be in the best interest of the City, which may be done with or without re-solicitation;

1.4.9. To discuss and negotiate with any Company(-ies) their Proposal terms and conditions, including but not limited to financial terms;

1.4.10. To terminate discussions and negotiations with any Company at any time and for any reason;

1.4.11. To issue additional requests for information; and

1.4.12. To take any action affecting this RFP, this RFP process, or the Services or facilities subject to this RFP that would be in the best interest of the City.

1.5. Expense of Submittal Preparation.

The City accepts no liability, and Companies will have no actionable claims, for reimbursement of any costs or expenses incurred in participating in this solicitation process. This includes expenses and costs related to Proposal submission, submission of written questions, attendance at pre-proposal meetings or evaluation interviews, contract negotiations, or activities required for contract execution.

1.6. Proposal Conditions.

1.6.1. The following terms are applicable to this RFP and the Company’s Proposal Not An Offer.

This RFP does not constitute an offer by the City. No binding contract, obligation to negotiate, or any other obligation shall be created on the part of the City unless the City and the Company execute a Contract. No recommendations or conclusions from this RFP process concerning the Company shall constitute a right (property or otherwise) under the Constitution of the United States or under the Constitution, case law, or statutory law of North Carolina.

1.6.2. Right to Terminate Discussions.

The Company’s participation in this process might result in the City selecting the Company to engage in further discussions. The commencement of such discussions, however, does not signify a commitment by the City to execute a Contract or to continue discussions. The City can terminate discussions at any time and for any reason.

1.6.3. Trade Secrets and Personal Identification Information.

Definition.

Upon receipt by the City, all materials submitted by a Company (including the Proposal) are considered public records except for (1) material that qualifies as “trade secret” information under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-152 et seq. (“Trade Secrets”) or (2) “personally identifiable information” protected by state or federal law, to include, but not be limited to, Social Security numbers, bank account numbers, and driver’s license numbers (“Personally Identifiable Information” or “PII”).

Instructions for Marking and Identifying Trade Secrets.

If any Proposal contains Trade Secrets or PII, such Trade Secrets and PII must specifically and clearly be identified by clearly separating them from the rest of the Proposal and marked either “Personally Identifiable Information – Confidential” or “Trade Secret— Confidential and Proprietary Information.” This confidentiality caption must appear on each page of the Trade Secret or PII materials, and the document(s) must be submitted separately in the Procurement Portal.

Availability of Proposals to City Staff and Contractors.

By submitting a Proposal, each Company agrees that the City may reveal any Trade Secret materials and PII contained therein to all City staff and City officials involved in the selection process, and to any outside consultant or other third parties who serve on the Evaluation Committee or who are hired or appointed by the City to assist in the evaluation process.

Availability of Proposals via Public Records Requests.

Any person or entity (including competitors) may request Proposals submitted in response to an RFP. Only those portions of RFPs properly designated as Trade Secret or PII are not subject to disclosure. The public disclosure of the contents of a Proposal or other materials submitted by a Company is governed by N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 132 and 66-152, et seq.

When determining whether to mark materials as Trade Secret, please note the following:

• Entire Proposals may not be marked as Trade Secret

• Pricing may not be marked as Trade Secret

The City may disqualify and Company that designates its entire Proposal as a trade secret, or any portion thereof that clearly does not qualify under applicable law as a Trade Secret or PII. Each Company agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and each of its officers, employees, and agents from all costs, damages, and expenses incurred in connection with refusing to disclose any material that the Company has designated as a Trade Secret or PII. This includes an obligation on the part of the Company to defend any litigation brought by a party that has requested Proposals or other information that the Company has marked Trade Secret or PII.

1.6.4. Statutory Requirements.

Any Contract awarded as a result of this RFP shall be in full conformance with all statutory requirements of North Carolina and all statutory requirements of the Federal Government, to the extent applicable.

1.6.5. Reservation of Right to Change Schedule.

The City shall ultimately determine the timing and sequence of events resulting from this RFP. The City reserves the right to delay the closing date and time for any phase if City staff believe that an extension will be in the best interest of the City.

1.6.6. Reservation of Right to Amend RFP.

The City reserves the right to amend this RFP at any time during the process, if it believes that doing so is in the best interests of the City. Any addenda will be posted to the Procurement Portal. Companies are required to acknowledge receipt of each addendum.

1.6.7. No Collusion or Conflict of Interest.

By responding to this RFP, the Company shall be deemed to have represented and warranted that the Proposal is not made in connection with any competing Company submitting a separate response to this RFP, and is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud.

1.6.8. Proposal Terms Firm and Irreversible.

The signed Proposal shall be considered a firm offer on the part of the Company. The City reserves the right to negotiate price and other terms. All Proposal elements (including all statements, claims, declarations, prices, and specifications) shall be considered firm and irrevocable for purposes of future Contract negotiations unless specifically waived in writing by the City. The Company chosen for award should be prepared to have its Proposal and any relevant correspondence incorporated into the Contract, either in part or in its entirety, at the City's election. Any false or misleading statements found in the Proposal or Contract exceptions not included in the Proposal may be grounds for disqualification.

1.6.9. Charlotte Business INClusion Program.

Pursuant to Charlotte City Council’s adoption of the Charlotte Business INClusion (CBI) Policy, the CBI program promotes diversity, inclusion, and local business opportunities in the City’s contracting and procurement process for Minority-owned, Woman-owned, and Small Business Enterprises (MWSBEs) with a significant business presence in the Charlotte Combined Statistical Area. The CBI Policy is posted at www.charlottebusinessinclusion.com.

https://charlottenc.bonfirehub.com/ https://charlottenc.bonfirehub.com/ http://www.charlottebusinessinclusion.com/

The City is committed to promoting opportunities for maximum participation of certified MWSBEs on City-funded contracts at both the prime and subcontract level. For MWSBE participation to count towards a Subcontracting Goal, MWSBEs must meet both the certification and geographic requirements as detailed throughout this solicitation and in the CBI Policy.

The City intends to negotiate utilization of MWSBE(s). The Company is required to submit the “MWSBE Utilization Form” through the Procurement Portal. Failure to submit this form with the Proposal shall render the Proposal non-responsive.

1.6.10. Subcontracting.

The Company given contract award shall be the prime contractor and shall be solely responsible for contractual performance. In the event of a subcontracting relationship, the Company shall remain the prime contractor and will assume all responsibility for the performance of the Services that are supplied by all subcontractors. The City retains the right to approve all subcontractors. Additionally, the City must be named as a third-party beneficiary in all subcontracts.

1.6.11. Equal Opportunity.

The City has an equal opportunity purchasing policy. The City seeks to ensure that all segments of the business community have access to supplying the goods and services needed by City programs. The City provides equal opportunity for all businesses and does not discriminate against any Companies regardless of race, color, religion, age, sex, and national origin or disability.

1.6.12. Use of City’s Name.

No advertising, sales promotion, or other materials of the Company or its agents or representatives may identify or reference the City in any manner absent the prior written consent of the City.

1.6.13. Withdrawal for Modification of Proposals.

Companies may change or withdraw a previously-submitted Proposal at any time prior to the Proposal due date by editing or removing their submission on the Procurement Portal.

1.6.14. No Bribery.

In submitting a response to this RFP, each Company certifies that neither it, any of its affiliates or subcontractors, nor any employees of any of the foregoing has bribed, or attempted to bribe, an officer or employee of the City in connection with the Contract.

1.6.15. Exceptions to the RFP.

Other than exceptions that are stated in compliance with this Section, each Proposal shall be deemed to agree to comply with all terms, conditions, specifications, and requirements of this RFP including the Sample Contract language. An “exception” is defined as the Company’s inability or unwillingness to meet a term, condition, specification, or requirement in the manner specified in the RFP including in the Sample Contract. All exceptions taken must be identified and explained in writing in your Proposal and must specifically reference the relevant section(s) of this RFP. If the Company provides an alternate solution when taking an exception to a requirement, the benefits of this alternative solution and impact, if any, on any part of the remainder of the Company’s solution, must be described in detail.

Exceptions must be submitted under the Acknowledgement section in the Procurement Portal. If exceptions are not identified in your Proposal, they may not be considered during Contract negotiation and could result in Proposal being rejected from further consideration.

If legal counsel needs to review the Sample Contract prior to signature, reviews must be completed before your Proposal is submitted. The City reserves the right to refuse consideration of any terms not so included. Any proposed changes to the Sample Terms after tentative contract award may constitute a material change to the Company’s Proposal and be grounds for revoking the award.

The City intends to enter into a City-drafted Contract with the successful Company that contains the terms and conditions set forth in the Sample Services Contract. The number and extent of any exceptions and proposed additions to the Sample Terms will be one of the City’s evaluation criteria.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City reserves the right to modify the Sample Terms prior to or during contract negotiations if it is in the City’s best interest to do so.

1.6.16. Fair Trade Certifications.

By submitting a Proposal, the Company certifies that:

• The prices in its Proposal have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with anyone, as to any matter relating to such prices for the purpose of restricting competition;

• Unless otherwise required by law, the prices quoted in its Proposal have not been knowingly disclosed by the Company and will not knowingly be so disclosed prior to the Proposal due date; and

• No attempt has been made or will be made by the Company to induce any other person or firm to submit or not to submit a Proposal for the purpose of restricting competition.

1.6.17. Companies’ Obligation to Fully Inform Themselves.

Companies or their authorized representatives must fully inform themselves as to all conditions, requirements, and specifications of this RFP before submitting a Proposal.

Failure to do so will be at the Company’s own risk.

1.6.18. Disclaimer

Each Company must perform its own evaluation and due diligence verification of all information and data provided by the City. The City makes no representations or warranties regarding any information or data provided by the City.

Section 2 Procurement Process

2. PROCUREMENT PROCESS.

This Section 2 contains information about the procurement process for this Project.

2.1. Schedule and Process.

The following chart shows the schedule of events for the conduct of this RFP. The key events and deadlines for this process are as follows, some of which are set forth in more detail in the Sections that follow:

DATE EVENT

March 16, 2026 Issuance of RFP. The City issues this RFP.

March 25, 2026 Submission of Written Questions. Companies are permitted to submit questions for purposes of clarifying this RFP. All submissions must be pursuant to the instructions in Section 2.2 by 4:00 p.m.

April 1, 2026 Proposal Submission. Proposals are due by 2:00 p.m. via the Procurement Portal.

April 2026 Evaluation. The Evaluation Committee will assess each Proposal and conduct evaluation activities with Companies.

May 2026 Contract Award by City Council. (anticipated)

June 2026 Services Commence. Company begins providing the Services.

2.2. Interpretations and Addenda.

There are two (2) ways to ask questions about this RFP: (1) submit a question through the Vendor Discussion section on the Procurement Portal; or (2) ask a question at the Pre-Proposal Conference, if one is held. Other than these permitted methods, Companies should refrain from contacting City staff prior to the Proposal due date. The City is not bound by any statements, representations or clarifications regarding this RFP other than those provided in writing by the Procurement Officer.

Questions must be submitted in the Procurement Portal by the deadline stated in Section 2.1. In the case of questions not submitted by the deadline, the City will, based on the availability of time to research and communicate an answer, decide whether an answer can be given before the Proposal deadline. When responding to Company questions or issuing addenda to the RFP, the City will post the answer or information to the Procurement Portal.

2.3. Pre-Proposal Conference.

A Pre-Proposal Conference for this RFP will not be conducted.

2.4. Submission of Proposals.

Proposals must be in the format specified in Section 4 of this RFP by April 1, 2026, on or before but no later than 2:00 p.m.

Refer to the Bonfire Procurement Portal Instructions document in the Procurement Portal for submission instructions.

When received, all Proposals and supporting materials, as well as correspondence relating to this RFP, shall become the property of the City. The Proposals will not be read aloud or made available to inspect or copy until any trade secret issues have been resolved.

2.5. Correction of Errors.

The person signing the Proposal must initial erasures or other corrections in the Proposal. The Company further agrees that in the event of any obvious errors, the City reserves the right to waive such errors in its sole discretion. The City, however, has no obligation under any circumstances to waive such errors.

Section 2 Procurement Process

2.6. Evaluation.

As part of the evaluation process, the Evaluation Committee may engage in discussions with one or more Companies. Discussions might be held with individual Companies to determine in greater detail the Company’s qualifications, to explore with the Company the scope and nature of the required contractual Services, to learn the Company’s proposed method of performance and the relative utility of alternative methods, and to facilitate arriving at a Contract that will be satisfactory to the City.

The City may in its discretion require one (1) or more Companies to make presentations to the Evaluation Committee or appear before the City and/or its representatives for an interview. During such interview, the Company may be required to orally and otherwise present its Proposal and to respond in detail to any questions posed. Additional meetings may be held to clarify issues or to address comments, as the City deems appropriate. Companies will be notified in advance of the time and format of such meetings.

Since the City may choose to award a Contract without engaging in discussions or negotiations, the Proposals submitted shall state the Company's best offer for performing the Services described in this

RFP.

2.7. Contract Award by City Council. (anticipated)

As soon as practical after opening the Proposals, the name of the apparent successful Company will be submitted to the City Council for final approval of award and the Procurement Officer will provide Contract documents to the Company. In the event the City Council approval is not received within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days after opening of the Proposals, the Company may request that it be released from the Proposal.

2.8. Vendor Inclusion.

The City’s vendor management philosophy supports a fair, open, and inclusive process that offers the same access and information to all Companies. Although Companies are not required to be registered in the City’s vendor registration system prior to submitting a Proposal, in order to execute a contract with the City and receive payment from the City, all Companies must register with the City’s vendor registration system.

Your registration provides the City with baseline information for your company including location, contact and demographic information, as well as your areas of expertise with specific commodity and/or service descriptions. You will also have the opportunity to complete any applicable certifications if your company desires to establish itself as an SBE, MBE, or WBE. The link below will provide you with the opportunity to complete your registration on-line with the City.

http://charlottenc.gov/vendors http://charlottenc.gov/vendors

Section 3 Scope of Services

3. SCOPE OF WATER TREATMENT VALVE REHABILITATION SERVICES.

3.1. Background.

Charlotte Water is the largest water service utility in the Carolinas, responsible for supplying water to nearly one million customers throughout Mecklenburg County. Industrial valves are used along the water intake and distribution lines to control flow. The valves include styles and sizes such as butterfly (12 inches to 120 inches), cone (12 inches to 48 inches), and gate (12 inches to 60 inches). Charlotte Water’s valve inventory consists of Pratt, Dezurik, Val-Matic, and Rodney Hunt-manufactured butterfly valves; Rodney Hunt Rotovalve, S. Morgan Smith cone valves and Allis Chalmer valves; and, Kennedy, Mueller, American, Clow, Dezurik, and Val-Matic manufactured gate valves. To maintain their operational status and minimize downtime, each valve is rehabilitated to Like-New Condition approximately every twenty (20) years.

3.2. General Scope.

The Company shall inspect Charlotte Water’s valves for rehabilitation needs in order to maintain their operational status and minimize downtime. After inspection and consultation with Charlotte Water to proceed, the rehabilitation Services shall be performed. Throughout the possible five-year contract term (initially three years with two additional one-year renewal options), approximately twenty (30) butterfly valves, thirty (50) cone valves, and twenty (20) gate valves are estimated to be sent to the Company for rehabilitation on an as-needed basis. It’s estimated that one to two butterfly valves, two to three cone valves, and one to two gate valves will be sent for Services every six (6) months. On rare occasions, the Company may be required to perform Water Treatment Valve Rehabilitation Services on other types of valves, if qualified and authorized by Charlotte Water. Materials utilized to perform Services shall be new, free of defects, suitable for the intended purpose, and of quality conforming to current engineering and manufacturing standards. Valves will be disconnected and reconnected by Charlotte Water.

3.3. Work Location and Transportation of Valves.

Rehabilitation Services shall be performed at the Company’s location(s). The Company shall be responsible for transporting valves to and from City property. Valves may be located throughout Mecklenburg and surrounding counties, but will typically be picked up from, and delivered to, the Franklin, Lee S. Dukes, Vest Water Treatment Plants and Catawba River Pump Station. When transporting valves back to Charlotte Water, shipment time shall not exceed an agreed upon time between City and Company.

3.4. Cost Estimates.

3.4.1. Each valve shall be inspected, and a cost estimate prepared and approved in writing by

Charlotte Water, prior to rehabilitation Services commencing.

3.4.2. All cost estimates shall have a complete description of work to be performed.

3.4.3. Cost estimates shall include labor costs by time and rate, parts by quantity and unit price, date and time work is to commence and expected to be completed, and all other known costs (and credits for scrapped parts, as applicable) associated with the rehabilitation, in accordance with the eventual Contract’s Price Schedule.

3.4.4. For parts deemed unsalvageable, the materials shall be scrapped. Charlotte Water shall receive a Company credit for the price of materials scrapped.

3.4.5. Should additional rehabilitation work not noted in the original cost estimate be warranted, a revised cost estimate shall be prepared and submitted to Charlotte Water for written approval prior to the additional work being performed.

3.4.6. Any fees paid by Charlotte Water for inspection(s) shall be applied, in full, toward the cost of the applicable rehabilitation. If the Company doesn’t provide rehabilitation, the Company shall keep the Inspection Fee.

3.5. Valve Rehabilitation Requirements.

3.5.1. Each valve, operating mechanism, and actuator shall be disassembled, and any disassembled components shall be organized and/or labeled in a manner to ensure proper reassembly.

3.5.2. All components shall be cleaned, in preparation for inspection and as part of the rehabilitation, using appropriate and effective means (i.e. non-ferrous components cleaned with solvent, castings blasted).

3.5.3. All components shall be inspected for excessive wear, defects (i.e. cracks), and other damage.

3.5.4. Unless otherwise required herein this Section, the condition of each component shall determine the level of care it receives in order to restore the valve to Like-New Condition.

This may involve re-machining, repairing, and/or replacing components. Any guide rods shall be replaced with stainless steel rods; and, all elastomeric seals, lubrication fittings, hoses, valve stem packings, O-rings, body pipe plugs, piston seals, wipers, rod packings, and head seals shall be replaced. Bronze body, plug, and head bushings shall be replaced and permanently secured. Seating surfaces on the body shall be replaced and or repaired. The hydraulic cylinder barrel shall be rid of any imperfections, including scratches. Pistons and piston rods shall be repaired or replaced, depending on their condition.

3.5.5. Unmachined exterior surfaces and interior components shall be coated with an epoxy paint.

The valve’s interior wetted non-ferrous surfaces shall be coated twice with NSF61-approved epoxy suitable for potable water. Charlotte Water reserves the right to approve or disapprove specific epoxy paints.

3.5.6. Once ready, the components shall be re-assembled to Like-New Condition.

3.5.7. Hydraulic cylinders shall be tested prior to installing on valves. Each shall undergo hydrostatic testing for a minimum of 10 minutes at one and a half times its working pressure.

3.5.8. After successful testing of the hydraulic cylinders, each valve shall be completely assembled and hydrostatically tested for a minimum of 10 minutes at one and a half times its rated working pressure. Testing shall ensure there are no leaks, and no weeping of the body and/or head castings.

3.5.9. The completed valve assembly shall be tested for a minimum of five minutes at the rated work pressure to ensure the valve stem packing is leak tight and seat leakage is within American Water Works Association (AWWA) testing specifications.

3.5.10. Each valve shall be operated at least three full strokes to verify its operation is smooth. One stroke shall mean open to close, and then close to open again.

3.6. City’s Observation During Testing.

3.6.1. Charlotte Water shall be notified prior to any testing occurring, with sufficient time provided to allow for travel arrangements to be made. Sufficient time will be conveyed to the Company by Charlotte Water and may vary each rehabilitation.

3.6.2. Charlotte Water reserves the right to observe the rehabilitation at any point during the process.

3.6.3. Charlotte Water may require its observation of successful testing prior to accepting a rehabilitated valve.

3.7. Warranty and Guarantee.

All Services performed shall be guaranteed by the Company for a period of at least eighteen (18) months, from the date the Company begins shipment of the valve, against defects in materials and workmanship. Warranty information and documentation shall be provided to Charlotte Water upon request, in the format specified (i.e. email) within a mutually agreeable amount of time.

3.8. Pricing.

3.8.1. Pricing will remain firm for the initial year of the Contract. Thereafter, price adjustments may be considered in accordance with the Price Schedule.

3.8.2. The Company shall furnish all supervision, labor, parts, tools, materials, equipment, supplies, and facilities necessary to provide Services. This shall include hoists, cranes, and other devices used for loading and unloading of valves.

3.8.3. Payment for Services will be rendered only after Charlotte Water has witnessed a successful test of, and received, the valve. Down payments or partial payments will not be made.

3.8.4. Charlotte Water will not make any payment to the Company if a valve fails testing after rehabilitation until all corrective actions are made, testing is re-performed, and the rehabilitation is successful. A rehabilitation’s success shall be based upon whether the valve is returned to Like-New Condition.

3.8.5. Charlotte Water shall not be billed for hours worked due to a failed test, unless Charlotte Water accepts, in writing, the Company’s justification of how the failed test was not pursuant to the Company’s failed rehabilitation efforts.

3.8.6. The Company may charge Charlotte Water a flat fee per inspection when analyzing a valve for rehabilitation. Only one Inspection Fee shall be applied per valve (e.g. an additional Inspection Fee may not be charged if additional rehabilitation work is discovered after the original cost estimate is accepted).

3.8.7. All labor work pursuant to the rehabilitation process (including preparations and testing) shall be included as part of the hourly rate.

3.8.8. Parts may be billed to Charlotte Water at a percentage markup over the Company’s cost.

Such markup percentage shall not exceed 15%. Verification of Company’s part costs shall be provided to Charlotte Water upon request and within a timeframe agreed upon by Charlotte Water and the Company.

3.8.9. Overtime rates shall not be charged to Charlotte Water.

3.8.10. Transportation fees may be charged per trip when valves are retrieved from or delivered to

Charlotte Water. One trip shall be equal to a retrieval or delivery. Retrieval and delivery shall equal two trips.

3.8.11. The Company will not be responsible for travel costs borne by Charlotte Water in conjunction its observation of the rehabilitation process.

4. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND FORMAT.

The City desires all Proposals to be identical in format in order to facilitate comparison. While the City’s format may represent departure from the Company’s preference, the City requires strict adherence to the format. All Forms and Questionnaires shall be found and submitted in the City’s Procurement Portal. The Proposal shall be submitted in the format described below:

A. Cover Letter;

B. Proposed Solution;

C. Price Schedule (Pricing Response);

D. Required Forms;

• The “Proposal Submission” Form;

• The “References” Form;

• The “MWSBE Utilization” Form;

• The “Company’s Background Response” Questionnaire;

• The “Safety Assessment” Form; and

E. Exceptions to the Remainder of the RFP, including the Sample Contract.

4.1. Proposal Content.

4.1.1. Cover Letter.

The Proposal must include a letter of transmittal attesting to its accuracy, signed by an individual authorized to execute binding legal documents. The cover letter shall provide the name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers of the Company along with the name, title, address, email address, and telephone numbers of the executive that has the authority to contract with the City. The cover letter shall present the Company's understanding of the Project and a summary of the approach to perform the Services.

4.1.2. Proposed Solution.

Given the purpose of this Project and the City's goals as stated in this RFP, provide a creative solution to meet such goals. For each component of the Project described in Section 3, state whether and how your Proposed Solution complies as well as any additional information requested. If you wish to add supplemental information, it shall be labeled “Supplemental Information.”

4.1.3. Required Forms.

To be deemed responsive to this RFP, Companies must complete all Proposal Forms listed in the Requested Information section on the Procurement Portal

4.1.4. Acknowledgements.

To be deemed responsive to this RFP, Companies must complete all Acknowledgements listed in the Requested Information section on the Procurement Portal.

4.1.5. Exceptions to the RFP.

Companies must review Section 1.6.15 for an overview of Exceptions to the RFP. If you elect to take Exceptions to the RFP, including the Sample Contract, then you must upload a redlined version under the Acknowledgement Section in the Procurement Portal. If exceptions are not identified by way of an uploaded redline version, then they may not be considered during Contract negotiation and could result in Proposal being rejected from further consideration.

5. PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA.

Proposals will be evaluated based on the Company's ability to meet the performance requirements of this RFP.

This section provides a description of the evaluation criteria that will be used to evaluate the Proposals. To be deemed responsive, it is important for the Company to provide appropriate detail to demonstrate satisfaction of each criterion and compliance with the performance provisions outlined in this RFP. The Company’s Proposal will be the primary source of information used in the evaluation process. Proposals must contain information specifically related to the proposed Services and requested herein. Failure of any Company to submit information requested may result in the elimination of the Proposal from further evaluation.

Proposals will be assessed to determine the most comprehensive, competitive and best value solution for the City based on, but not limited to, the criteria below. The City reserves the right to modify the evaluation criteria or waive portions thereof. Proposals will be evaluated on the following major categories:

a. Qualifications and Experience;

b. Project Approach and Proposed Solution;

c. Cost Effectiveness and Value; and

d. Acceptance of the Terms of the Contract

5.1. Qualifications and Experience.

Companies will be evaluated based upon their background and experience information and qualifications in performing the same or substantially similar Services.

5.2. Project Approach and Proposed Solution.

Companies will be evaluated based upon their understanding, experience and qualifications in performing the same or substantially similar Services, as reflected by its experience in performing such Services. The evaluation will include references regarding work for organizations with needs similar to the City's, and the feasibility of the Company's approach for the provision of the Services.

5.3. Cost Effectiveness and Value.

Under this criterion, Proposals will be compared in terms of the most reasonable and effective pricing options. The Evaluation Committee will also take into consideration any indirect costs associated with the Services and administration of the Contract.

5.4. Acceptance of the Terms of the Contract.

The City will evaluate the Proposals for compliance with the terms, conditions, requirements, and specifications stated in this RFP including the sample contract language provided. Regardless of exceptions taken, Companies shall provide pricing based on the requirements and terms set forth in this RFP. Exceptions shall be identified in accordance with Sections 1.6.15 of this RFP.

1. Introduction.
1.1. Objective.
1.2. Definitions.
1.3. Accuracy of RFP and Related Documents.
1.4. City’s Rights and Options.
1.5. Expense of Submittal Preparation.
1.6. Proposal Conditions.
1.6.1. The following terms are applicable to this RFP and the Company’s Proposal Not An Offer.
1.6.2. Right to Terminate Discussions.
1.6.3. Trade Secrets and Personal Identification Information.
1.6.4. Statutory Requirements.
1.6.5. Reservation of Right to Change Schedule.
1.6.6. Reservation of Right to Amend RFP.
1.6.7. No Collusion or Conflict of Interest.
1.6.8. Proposal Terms Firm and Irreversible.
1.6.9. Charlotte Business INClusion Program.
1.6.10. Subcontracting.
1.6.11. Equal Opportunity.
1.6.12. Use of City’s Name.
1.6.13. Withdrawal for Modification of Proposals.
1.6.14. No Bribery.
1.6.15. Exceptions to the RFP.
1.6.16. Fair Trade Certifications.
1.6.17. Companies’ Obligation to Fully Inform Themselves.
1.6.18. Disclaimer
Each Company must perform its own evaluation and due diligence verification of all information and data provided by the City. The City makes no representations or warranties regarding any information or data provided by the City.
2. Procurement Process.
2.1. Schedule and Process.
2.2. Interpretations and Addenda.
2.3. Pre-Proposal Conference.
2.4. Submission of Proposals.
2.5. Correction of Errors.
2.6. Evaluation.
2.7. Contract Award by City Council. (anticipated)
2.8. Vendor Inclusion.
3. SCope of WATER TREATMENT VALVE REHABILITATION SERVICES.
3.1. Background.
3.2. General Scope.
3.3. Work Location and Transportation of Valves.
3.4. Cost Estimates.
3.5. Valve Rehabilitation Requirements.
3.6. City’s Observation During Testing.
3.7. Warranty and Guarantee.
3.8. Pricing.
4. Proposal CONTENT AND format.
4.1. Proposal Content.
4.1.1. Cover Letter.
4.1.2. Proposed Solution.
4.1.3. Required Forms.
4.1.4. Acknowledgements.
4.1.5. Exceptions to the RFP.
5. proposal evaluation criteria.
5.1. Qualifications and Experience.
5.2. Project Approach and Proposed Solution.
5.3. Cost Effectiveness and Value.
5.4. Acceptance of the Terms of the Contract.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .