4-Attachment D - Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 38 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- MK26-31
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Solicitation #MK26-31 issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services. The procurement seeks a vendor to conduct undercover compliance investigations of authorized WIC vendors annually to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse of WIC funds. The contract term is five years with an option for a five-year renewal. The evaluation process requires vendors to meet three mandatory requirements: demonstrating experience as a secret shopper or covert investigator, submitting at least two completed performance or professional references using the attached reference form, and providing a technical response detailing their experience in private investigative work and secret shopping operations.
The scoresheet establishes five scoreable technical criteria, each weighted at 20 percent of the total technical score for a combined 1,000 possible points: Investigator Qualifications and Vetting Process, Covert Procedures and Evidence Collection Methodology, Safe Food Handling and Donation Protocols, Reporting Accuracy and Timeliness, and Schedule Adherence and Fair Hearing Capacity. Proposals must achieve a minimum of 700 points (70 percent) on the technical evaluation to meet the required threshold. The vendor with the highest ranking will be selected to negotiate a contract at compensation determined to be fair and reasonable; if negotiations fail with the top-ranked vendor, the state may proceed with the next highest-ranked vendor. No pricing information is to be included in proposal submissions, as compensation will be negotiated following selection.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 3-Attachment B - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Attachment C - Mandatory Minimums Technical Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 7-Attachment E - Reference Document.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| WIC COMPLIANCE BUYS AND PRIVATE INVESTIGATIONS | ||||||||||
| SOLICITATION #MK26-31 | ||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | Vendor must have experience as a secret shopper or covert investigator. | |||||||||
| 2 | Vendor must upload at least two completed performance/professional references as part of the proposal using the attached reference form (Attachment E) | |||||||||
| 3 | Vendor must upload a technical response (see Attachment C), including their experience in private investigative work and experience as a secret shopper. | |||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Investigator Qualifications and Vetting Process | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Covert Procedures and Evidence Collection Methodology | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Safe Food Handling and Donation Protocols | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | Reporting Accuracy and Timeliness | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | Schedule Adherence and Fair Hearing Capacity | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 1000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 70% | 700.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .