0002 Attachment 1 Answers to RFIs Martinez CA 6.3.25.docx

DOCX document 90 KB Posted

Attached to
Y1LZ--612-165 Construct Parking Structure Replacing Expiring Lease Design-Build 2024 (VA-24-00039480)
Solicitation number
36C77625R0021
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Request for Information (RFI) tracking sheet for a VA design-build parking structure project at the Martinez VA Medical Center in California. The solicitation (36C77625R0021) involves constructing a new 450-space parking garage that will replace an expiring lease, with demolition of existing temporary buildings (AB-5, AB-6, AB-7) and a solar system. Key modifications from the original solicitation include extending the project experience timeframe to 8 years (due to COVID-era limitations), clarifying parking space calculations, and increasing proposal page limits from 35 to 50 pages.

The RFI responses provide detailed technical clarifications, including specifications for elevator design, EV charging, utility connections, solar array preparation, and site logistics. Notable technical requirements include: structural supports for future solar arrays, non-machine room less elevators, specific signage requirements, and security/access considerations. The procurement will follow a two-phase evaluation process, with a maximum of five offerors selected to proceed to Phase II, focusing on technical qualifications, past performance, and design-build team experience for this VA Northern California Health Care System project.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Special Notice of Cancellation - Martinez CA.pdf PDF
36C77625R0021 0009.pdf PDF
Site Visit 612165 sign in sheet 07152025.pdf PDF
0007 Attachment 1 - DBA wage rates Contra Costa Rev 6.27.25.pdf PDF
0007 Attachment 2 - SCA wate rates Contra Costa Rev 26 5.21.25.pdf PDF
36C77625R0021 0006.docx DOCX document
Tech Questions Tracker DB Parking Structure Martinez CA 6.16.25.docx DOCX document
36C77625R0021 0005.docx DOCX document
Tech Questions Tracker - DB Parking Structure - Martinez CA 6-12-25.docx DOCX document
36C77625R0021 0004.docx DOCX document
S05 - Tech Questions Tracker - DB Parking Structure - Martinez CA 6-5-25.docx DOCX document
36C77625R0021 0003.docx DOCX document
0002 Attachment 3 WMC Contractor Request FEB 2025.pdf PDF
36C77625R0021 0002.docx DOCX document
0002 Attachment 4 VHA COR Contractor Security Presentation April 2025 Final.pdf PDF
0002 Attachment 2 as built Record drawings.pdf PDF
36C77625R0021 0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment 10 - DBA Rates - Contra Costa - 3-21-25.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Limitations on Subcontracting - 852.219-75.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Geotech Report - Parking Structure - Martinez 03202025.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - Service Rates - Contra Costa - 12-23-24.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Final SOW - Construct Parking Structure - Martinez CA - 3.26.pdf PDF
36C77625R0021_1.docx DOCX document
Attachment 11 - Brand Name JA DB Martinez CA.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Spec 010000 and 01321616 - 03202025.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Martinez VA Campus Utility Drawings 03202025.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Division Cost Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7 - PPQ.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6 - Martinez - Project site map r2 03202025.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - PG 18-15 Volume DB 2024-05 Parking Structure Martinez.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TECHNICAL QUESTIONS AND

SOLICITATION #:
36C77625R0021
RESPONSES TRACKING SHEET
PROJECT TITLE:
Design and Construct Parking Structure Replacing Expiring Lease at the Martinez VA Medical Center in Martinez, CA
#
RECEIVED
ANSWERED
CONTRACTOR QUESTION
VA RESPONSE
1
5/21/2025
5/22/2025
Reference the RFP, section 2.7, part B Phase 1 Format, Factor 2 Design-Build Team Experience and Factor 3 Past Performance where it states that projects provided shall be completed within the last 5 years. Considering the 5-year window encompasses the COVID era and not as much work was performed over this period, can the time frame for past performance of projects be extended to 7 or 8 years from the date of this solicitation?
In response to the inquiry regarding the limited project activity during the COVID era, the Government agrees to extend the allowable timeframe for relevant project experience and past performance submissions. Offerors may now include projects completed within the last 8 years from the date of this solicitation. – VA CO
2
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please clarify the total number of parking spaces for the new parking garage, i.e., 350 new spaces plus the 100 lost to the construction for a total of 450, or 350 total?
Construction of a total 450 included the sum of parking lost for the building foot print. VA COR
3
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please provide a copy of the as-built/record drawings for Temporary Buildings AB-5, AB-6, and AB-7 that are noted for demolition.
No as-built are available. VA COR
4
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Will the temporary buildings slated for demolition be empty of furniture and any miscellaneous items?
Empty of furniture. VA COR
5
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Are there any environmental testing reports available for the temporary buildings which would note the need for sampling or additional testing required for lead, asbestos, or any other hazardous materials in or around the existing temporary buildings? If so, please provide.
These modular building were built in 1990 and are not anticipated to have any asbestos or other environmental hazards associated with them. No test reports exist for these associated structures. – VA COR
6
5/21/2025
Please provide a copy of the as-built/record drawings for the solar system noted for demolition.
See attachment 2 to amendment 0002
7
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please provide a copy of the as-built utility drawings for buildings AB-5, AB-6, AB-7, and the Solar System.
See response to RFI 6 and 3. – VA COR
8
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Are we required to turn over any of the solar system or its components to the VA?
No – VA COR
9
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Are we required to re-cycle the solar panels and/or electronics which are to be demolished based on the building demolition and solar system demolition?
No – VA COR
10
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Are the existing utility systems/connections, i.e., water, sewer, electrical, telecommunication systems serving Buildings AB-5, AB-6, AB-7, and in general the VA Campus VA owned or privately owned by the various utility companies?
VA owned for water and sewer utilities on site. Power and gas on to the campus is owned by PG&E all the way up to the transformer and meter, then VA owned after that. – VA COR
11
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please clarify the following for the structural and electrical design requirements for the possible solar array that is in the planning stages for the roof level of the new parking garage:
a.Should our design include structural supports for a flat solar array support system with a 9 ft. clearance (or advise the minimum height)?
b.Should our design be based on a cantilevered solar support system (future) to minimize the number of support columns for the future solar array support system?
c.Should our structural design include a column extension to 4 ft. above the roof level for attaching the solar support system?
d.Should our design include fall protection at the roof level to 8 ft. (or advise on the height) above the drive surface to avoid interfering with the future proposed solar array system?
e.Should our design include an electrical panel for the solar system, i.e., a place to feed the solar into the power distribution system for the parking garage?
a 9’ so there can be parking on the roof

b cantilevered is preferred but not required c Yes d yes e yes

– VA COR

12
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Is a machine room less (MRL) elevator acceptable?
No, please follow VA Specification. – VA COR
13
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Are the elevators (qty. 2) required to be on emergency power?
No, but safety egress of the elevator for VA specification will require battery system to allow elevator to allow passengers to egress or lower elevator for egress. – VA COR
14
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Is the “Garage Full Signage” just a basic car counter system?
No, includes all signage for way finding, egress and other required signage. Car counter not required. – VA COR
15
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Are we required to provide separate closets for the telephone and data infrastructure per VA Design Manuals?
Data can be co-located with electrical room in telecom enclosure security cabinet. Cooling will be required. – VA COR
16
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Are we to design the data room/(s) and telephone closets based on the minimal room sizes noted in the VA Design Manuals (ISTS Standards)?
No, plan for OI&T lockable cabinet. This application would be applied as telecom enclosure. – VA COR
17
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Our experience with Level 2 EV chargers for Government Projects has noted that there is a problem with finding 7.2KW chargers which meet the Buy American Act and the current Federal Register outlines the concerns EV chargers that meet the Buy American Act. Please advise if the VA has a make and model of an EV charger that would be acceptable for use in the project? If not, can this scope of work receive a waiver for meeting the BAA?
Level 2 is not required

Additional chargers could be substituted Please adhere to the BAA – VA COR

18
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please clarify the number of site visits required by the DB A/E and the specific Disciplines required for each of the visits based on the requirement for “periodic site visits”?
site visits are as needed to support the design and construction of the project. – VA COR
19
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please clarify the requirement for the A/E to “perform/witness” commissioning of the building systems. In general, we would recommend that the A/E review the commissioning documentation and provide a formal report. Please advise if this is an acceptable approach?
No requirement for commissioning except for the elevators. – VA COR
20
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Reference the Schedule provided for the project. The schedule outlines the standard design and then construction approach. Is a Fast-Track Approach for the demolition, utility work, and foundation package would acceptable?
A fast track approach can be accomplished depending on the contractor’s team ability to support, schedule and coordinate. – VA COR
21
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please provide a copy of the VA Security/Background Information required for submission for all of our construction employees?
Security is standard PIV process in coordination with the COR. See attachments 0002 Attachment 3 & 0002 Attachment 4

· VA COR

22
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please clarify if we are to provide any security guards for the construction site or if a locked temporary construction fence for the construction site is acceptable?
A locked and secured construction fence is acceptable. No security guards are required. – VA COR
23
5/21/2025
6/2/2025
Please clarify if the government will allow on-site parking and a staging area for construction materials and pre-cast structural elements?
Staging area and laydown area is limited based on the size of the facility and the contractor should plan deliveries with coordinated installation to reduce site storage concerns. Some parking is available across Muir Road but limited along with limited street parking. No contractor parking on site unless within the construction area. – VA COR
24
5/22/2025
6/2/2025
We seek clarification regarding Factor 2: Technical Qualifications, which states that:

“Resumes must demonstrate specialized experience and technical competence in construction or design of at least one (1) multi-story parking garage or similar multi-story design project in scope and complexity.”

This criteria is altered to the following:

The Offeror shall submit an organizational chart and indicate the prime responsible firm (or firms, if a J/V) and individuals, as well as the roles and responsibilities of individuals proposed as consultants and subcontractors. Provide a list of all consultants and all proposed major subcontractors, including telephone number, address, and name of contact.

The Offeror shall provide resumes that describes the design build team’s qualifications, to include education and/or certification(s), of the following personnel (page limitation, two (2) pages per requested resume):

•Design-Build Project Manager
•Construction Project Manager/Site Superintendent
•On-site Quality Control Specialist
•Lead Architect
•Lead Structural Engineer
•Lead MEP Engineer
•Lead Civil Engineer
•Fire Protection Engineer

*Dual hatting will not be allowed. There is no preprinted form for this submittal.

For each of these required key personnel, the offeror shall identify the available capacity and any current projects they are working along with the anticipated completion dates.

The Offeror shall describe its approach for managing performance under this solicitation, including techniques for management of work coordination with subcontractors and measures/corrective action that will be taken for substandard performance. The Offeror shall describe proposed Design-Build Peer Review techniques along with the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan.

Evaluation Methodology: Technical Qualifications will evaluate the relevant management, required technical personnel, and subcontractor capabilities and qualifications of the team to provide the required planning, implementation, and completion of the project. The VA will consider education and certifications, as well as relevant experience in an operational health care facility. The VA will also evaluate how the Offeror organized personnel for this project, and the lines of authority between the construction firm, design firm, and key subcontractors – VA CO

25
5/23/2025
6/2/2025
Does Phase II take into account the evaluation of a firms Phase I submission?
Per solicitation: Upon receipt of Phase I proposals, the VA team will evaluate and determine the highest qualified Offerors based on their Phase I submissions. A maximum of five (5) Offerors will be selected to provide a proposal for Phase II. Offerors not selected to provide a Phase II proposal will be notified that they are no longer being considered for this project.

Phase II proposals will be evaluated in accordance with FAR Part 15, the two (2) Non-Price evaluation factors listed below, and Price for Phase II.

1. Technical Solution

1. Draft Project Schedule

Thus, Phase I evaluation is not a factor in the Phase II.

· VA CO

26
5/28/2025
6/2/2025
Reference the RFP, Section 2.27 VAAR 852.223-70 Instruction to Offerors – Sustainable Acquisition Plan (Sep 2019) – Page 25 of 103, states that “Offerors shall include a Sustainable Acquisition Plan in their technical proposals.”

0. Is this applicable to this proposal?

A sustainable acquisition plan is not applicable to this proposal.

-VA CO

27
5/28/2025
6/2/2025
1. Reference the RFP, Section 2.7 Proposal Requirements, Part B., Factor 2 Technical Qualifications, Submission Criteria where it states “Note: The design-build contractor shall ensure that all drawings submitted for permits are stamped by a professional licensed engineer or architect, who must hold a valid license in the State of California. This requirement applies to all project phases and deliverables to ensure compliance with local building and federal regulations.” This statement raises a few questions.

a. Concerning “submitted for permits” and “ensure compliance with local building and….regulations”, typically state and local agencies have no jurisdiction on federal government lands and their projects and the only ‘permit’ that has to be submitted for may be a NPDES storm water permit if the site is large enough to trigger. Questions:

i. Will the state and local government agencies have any jurisdiction on this campus and over this project?

ii. If so, what other permits might be required?

b. Concerning the AE having to be licensed in the State of California, this is not a typical requirement of the VA Design Standards, that the AE of record be licensed in the state where the project is located. The statement in the RFP specifies that drawings submitted for “permits” must meet this requirement. Referencing the statement above regarding permits, if there are no other permits required other than maybe a storm water permit, will the final “Issued for Construction” documents submitted to the VA for approval require stamps from a A/E holding a valid license in California, or would a neighboring state suffice?

Refer to question 4 for the revised criteria. Also detailed in amendment 0002 continuation page.

AE firms need to be licensed in any US state for this VA requirement. – VA CO

28
5/28/2025
6/2/2025
Reference the RFP, Section 2.7 Proposal Requirements, Part B., Factor 2 Technical Qualifications, Design-Build Team Experience where it states “If submitting as a teaming arrangement the Offeror will provide the number of years and projects, they have completed together. A teaming arrangement must have not less than 1 project of similar scope and complexity.” Concerning the terminology of ‘submitting as a teaming arrangement’ used here, please confirm that only past experience examples from the Offeror, the name listed on Block 14 of the SF1442, will be accepted / evaluated and not those of a major subcontractor or firm other than the Offeror.

Refer to question 4 for the revised criteria.

Only examples from the offeror listed in Block 14 of the SF1442 will be accepted and evaluated and not those of major subcontractors other than the offeror.

– VA CO

29
5/28/2025
6/2/2025
Reference the RFP, Section 2.7 Proposal Requirements, Part B., Factor 3 Past Performance, Submission Criteria where it states “The evaluation shall consider the specific experience (minimum of five years) and qualifications (i.e., education, training, registration, certifications, overall relevant experience, and longevity with the firm as full-time employees) of personnel proposed for assignment to the project, and their record of working together as a team when evaluating professional qualifications.” This statement seems out of place, not belonging in this Factor 3, as there is no other mention anywhere about listing personnel under this Factor. Can you please clarify the intent here, or what is required?
The following language is removed from the criteria in its entirety. Also detailed in amendment 0002 continuation page.

“The evaluation shall consider the specific experience (minimum of five years) and qualifications (i.e., education, training, registration, certifications, overall relevant experience, and longevity with the firm as full-time employees) of personnel proposed for assignment to the project, and their record of working together as a team when evaluating professional qualifications.”

30
5/29/2025
5/29/2025
Reference the RFP, Section 2.7 Proposal Requirements, Part B., Factor 2 Technical Qualifications, Submission Criteria where it states “The Offeror shall also provide a resume ….. for each of the following key construction personnel: Project Manager, Site Superintendent, and any known major subcontractors.” Our design firm will technically be one of our ‘major subcontractors’. Are they to be listed here, or will the SF-330s provided previously in this section suffice?

Refer to question 4 for the revised criteria.

– VA CO

31
5/29/2025
5/29/2025
Reference the Attachment 1 Statement of Work for Design Build Services document, section 3.13.3 concerning anti-suicide system. Will fencing or screening for this purpose be required on the ground level?

Not required for the ground floor.

– VA COR

32
5/29/2025
6/2/2025
The VA Physical Security & Resiliency Design Manual, paragraph 3.7.2.2 states that we are to "include in the design the ability to completely shut down vehicular and pedestrian access to the parking facility when closed." This means that we will have to provide a door or gate for every entrance in the new garage and also security fencing on the ground level.

Will this be applicable to this garage or will it receive a waiver?

The facility already has gated security system at the main entrances thus not making this a requirement for this structure.

– VA COR

Reference the RFP, Section 2.7 Proposal Requirements, Part B., Phase 1 Proposal Format and Evaluation where it states “…..shall not exceed a total of THIRTY-FIVE (35) pages.” With the inclusion of CPAR and PPQs for our 5 past performance projects in Factor 3, the requirement of a 35-page limitation cannot be met. Please modify the page limitation to allow for the inclusion of CPAR and PPQ documents in Factor 3.

The page limit is increased to 50 pages. PPQ and CPARS will not count towards the 50 page page limitation for submission of phase I proposals.

-VA CO

image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .