ATTACHMENT A_Version 2 - PHASE 1 FACTOR 2 - EXPERIENCE.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Y1LZ--Construct Additional Parking Lots Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C26120R0028
About this file
This document provides details for a design-build federal contract opportunity to construct additional parking lots at the VA Southern Nevada Health Care System campus in Las Vegas, Nevada. The contract will require designing and constructing approximately 500,000 square feet of additional asphalt parking across three areas of the medical center campus, to add a total of at least 480 parking spaces. Work will include site preparation, paving, lighting, signage, drainage improvements, and protective bollards. Proposals are due by April 27, 2020, though the date may be delayed. This is a two-phase solicitation following FAR 36.3 and has an estimated value between $2-5 million. The opportunity is set aside solely for qualified Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Basis of Evaluation
ATTACHMENT A
FACTOR 2 - EXPERIENCE
36C26120R0028
Submit the following information: 1. Submit a maximum of Two (2) example projects demonstrating the experience and capability of the lead Architect-Engineering Firm that will be designing the project. Examples should demonstrate offerors experience as the Prime Contractor on recent, relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP.
2. Submit a maximum of Two (2) example projects demonstrating the experience and capability of the lead Construction Contractor that will be performing the largest construction effort on the project. Examples should demonstrate offerors experience as the Prime Contractor on recent, relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP
3. Submit a maximum of Two (2) example design/build projects that the prime contractor and proposed Architect-Engineering firm have completed together. If no project completed together, offeror may be rated more unfavorably.
| BASIS OF EVALUATION: | The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing recent, relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements of similar size, scope and complexity. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Offeror’s projects will be rated individualy and then combined to achieve an overall factor rating. Offeror’s demonstrating recent and relevant design-build experience; timely project completion; recent and relevant design/construction of surface parking; recent and relevant examples of offeror and partner firm demonstrating a successful contractor team arrangement; and, recent and relevant projects completed in the NCO 21 Geographic location may be rated more favorably. |
| Design-build | Recent and relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience. |
| Surface Parking facilties | Recent and relevant projects that demonstrate experience in designing and/or constructing surface parking of similar size, scope and complexity may be considered more favorably. |
| Timely completion | Recent and relevant projects that demonstrate timely completion of projects may be rated more favorably. |
| Geographic locations | Recent and relevant projects completed in the NCO 21 geographic locations of Nevada, Northern California and Hawaii may be rated more favorably.. |
| ADJECTIVAL RATINGS | |
| Rating | Description |
| Outstanding | Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. |
| Good | Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. |
| Acceptable | Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. |
| Marginal | Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. |
| Unacceptable | Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of |
unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.
| DEFINITIONS | |
| Strength | An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance. |
| Weakness | A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. |
| Significant Weakness | A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. |
| Deficiency | A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. |
| RELEVANCY DEFINITIONS | |
| Relevancy Definition: | For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as new construction and/or repair, alteration and related demolition of existing infrastructure completed within the past five years of the proposal issue date of this RFP. Infrastructure is defined as: 1) construction of a healthcare facility; 2) construction for industrial buildings and warehouses; 3) nonresidential buildings, other than industrial buildings and warehouses; or 4) improvements such as utilities, landscaping, and roadways. “New Construction” is defined as construction that provides for new or expanded facilities or infrastructure. New construction does not include repair and/or modernization of an existing facility nor does it include replacement or upgrade to an existing infrastructure. |
| Not Relevant: | Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Size Defintition: | $1,000,000 or more |
| Complexity Definition: | Complexity is defined as a design-build project that includes several specialty trades and some engineering. |
| Scope Definition: | Scope is defined as work or activities related, or closely related to that which is outlined in the Statement of Work such as but not limited to; construction of new asphalt paving, compaction, grading, seal coating, striping, electrical and solar. |
| Recency Definition: | For purposes of this evaluation, a recent project is defined as a project completed in the previous five (5) calendar years. |
| Project Definition: | A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project. |
| Prime Contractor: | the Offeror (or JV Partner) must have been a Prime Contractor for the projects and each project shall be $25,000 or more in dollar value for Group 1 offerors |
FIRM NAME
36C26118R0065
FACTOR 2 EXPERIENCE
GROUP 1
| FIRM NAME: | |
| Experience - Project 1 | Title |
| Contract # | |
| Project Description | |
| Dollar Amount | |
| Project Description | New construction, Alteration, Repair, ect…. |
| Construction Type | Design-build / Design Bid Build, ect…. |
| Completed Project? | Yes / No |
| Recent (within five years)? | Yes / No |
| On time? | Yes / No |
| Performed as Prime Contractor? | Yes / No |
| Self-Performance? | % of self-performance |
| Joint Venture? | Yes / No |
| Within VISN 21 Geographic Location? | Yes / No |
| FIRM NAME: | |
| Experience - Project 2 | Title |
| Contract # | |
| Project Description | |
| Dollar Amount | |
| Project Description | New construction, Alteration, Repair, ect…. |
| Construction Type | Design-build / Design Bid Build, ect…. |
| Completed Project? | Yes / No |
| Recent (within five years)? | Yes / No |
| On time? | Yes / No |
| Performed as Prime Contractor? | Yes / No |
| Self-Performance? | % of self-performance |
| Joint Venture? | Yes / No |
| Within VISN 21 Geographic Location? | Yes / No |
| FIRM NAME: | |
| Experience - Project 3 | Title |
| Contract # | |
| Project Description | |
| Dollar Amount | |
| Project Description | New construction, Alteration, Repair, ect…. |
| Construction Type | Design-build / Design Bid Build, ect…. |
| Completed Project? | Yes / No |
| Recent (within five years)? | Yes / No |
| On time? | Yes / No |
| Performed as Prime Contractor? | Yes / No |
| Self-Performance? | % of self-performance |
| Joint Venture? | Yes / No |
| Within VISN 21 Geographic Location? | Yes / No |
| FIRM NAME: | |
| Experience - Project 4 | Title |
| Contract # | |
| Project Description | |
| Dollar Amount | |
| Project Description | New construction, Alteration, Repair, ect…. |
| Construction Type | Design-build / Design Bid Build, ect…. |
| Completed Project? | Yes / No |
| Recent (within five years)? | Yes / No |
| On time? | Yes / No |
| Performed as Prime Contractor? | Yes / No |
| Self-Performance? | % of self-performance |
| Joint Venture? | Yes / No |
| Within VISN 21 Geographic Location? | Yes / No |
| FIRM NAME: | |
| Experience - Project 5 | Title |
| Contract # | |
| Project Description | |
| Dollar Amount | |
| Project Description | New construction, Alteration, Repair, ect…. |
| Construction Type | Design-build / Design Bid Build, ect…. |
| Completed Project? | Yes / No |
| Recent (within five years)? | Yes / No |
| On time? | Yes / No |
| Performed as Prime Contractor? | Yes / No |
| Self-Performance? | % of self-performance |
| Joint Venture? | Yes / No |
| Within VISN 21 Geographic Location? | Yes / No |
| FIRM NAME: | |
| Experience - Project 6 | Title |
| Contract # | |
| Project Description | |
| Dollar Amount | |
| Project Description | New construction, Alteration, Repair, ect…. |
| Construction Type | Design-build / Design Bid Build, ect…. |
| Completed Project? | Yes / No |
| Recent (within five years)? | Yes / No |
| On time? | Yes / No |
| Performed as Prime Contractor? | Yes / No |
| Self-Performance? | % of self-performance |
| Joint Venture? | Yes / No |
| Within VISN 21 Geographic Location? | Yes / No |
| Overall Rating | FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY |
| Basis for the Rating | FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .