S02 - Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
Upgrade Existing OR Suite for Fire Code Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24825R0044
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 8

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 7) for Solicitation Number 36C24825R0044, related to a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) construction project at the Miami Medical Center. The questionnaire is designed to capture detailed information about a contractor's prior performance, likely to be used in evaluating their qualifications for the OR Suite upgrade project. While the specific questionnaire contents are not visible in the provided file, it is standard practice for such forms to request information about project complexity, adherence to schedules, quality of work, cost control, and overall contract management performance from previous similar construction or healthcare facility renovation projects.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Upgrade Existing OR Suite for Fire Code, newest first.
File Type Posted
S02 - Attachment 6 - RFI Responses 36C24825R0044 - 546-22-143 - BB Upgrade Existing OR Suite for Fire Code Compliance.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C24825R0044 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Price Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 3 - Wage Determination - Miami Dade.pdf PDF
S02 Solicitation 36C24825R0044.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Experience Modification Rate.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - AE Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - AE Drawings.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR

1. Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes).

2. The entire cover sheet and questionnaire should be forwarded to your previous clients. The questionnaire shall cover projects identified in the evaluation factors (Experience, Past Performance, and Technical Qualifications) of the Offeror’s proposal.

3. Send an electronic or hard copy of the form to each of your reference contacts.

INSTRUCTIONS TO CLIENT/REFERENCE CONTACT

1. The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contract requirement. The purpose of this form is to obtain your assessment of the Contractor's performance on contracts performed for you by the Contractor. The VA is seeking to determine whether the Offeror has experience that will enhance their technical capability to perform and whether the Offeror consistently delivers quality services in a timely and cost-effective manner.

2. Clients shall submit the completed questionnaire via email to Aldwyn Singleton, Contracting Officer at aldwyn.singleton@va.gov and Ana Vazquez at ana.vazquez2@va.gov no later than the offer due date of the solicitation. Please reference “Solicitation 36C24825R0044/Past Performance/Company Name” in the subject field of your email.

GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]

Contractor/Company Name

Street Address

Contractor Point of Contact Name

City

Point of Contact Phone Number

State

Reference Project Title

Zip Code

Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):

Email

Contract Number

Contract Dollar Value

Description of Work

Role of Contractor on this Project (check appropriate box)

|_| Prime Contractor |_| Subcontractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain)

CLIENT/RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]

Company Name

Street Address

POC Name

City

Phone Number

State

Fax Number

Zip Code

Email

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 3 OR 2 in the Remarks section, below [text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary].

5
4
3
2
1
Exceptional
Very Good
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral
Performance met all contract requirements and EXCEEDED many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
Management
5
4
3
2
1
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Effectiveness of onsite management and supervision
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Level of cooperation and responsiveness to the Government
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Professional conduct of the employees
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
How effective was the contractor in managing Subcontractors?
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Quality Control
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Followed approved Quality Control Plan
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Overall quality of products, material and equipment installed
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Timely Correction of noted deficiencies
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Accuracy, adequacy and detail of Submittals
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Regulations
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
To what level did the contractor follow drawings, specifications and regulations and guidance such as the VA Technical Information Library (TIL)
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
To what level would you rate the contactors ability to follow Design Guidelines
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
How would you rate the contractors use of specified material?
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Problem Resolution
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
How effective is the contractor in resolving problems and correcting deficiencies in timely manner?
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Schedule
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
To what level did the contractor meet approved and established schedules
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Rate the Contractor’s submission of submitted submittals in a timely manner
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Submission of progress schedules, invoices and daily reports
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Completion of punch list items
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Warranty Response
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
What level would you rate the contractor’s response to warranty support?
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
What was the level of cooperation with the Government personnel after award?
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Recommendations
NO

YES

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.”
☐
To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS for this contract?
☐

REMARKS [Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type].

What are the two best performance traits this contractor displayed during the period of performance?

1.

2.

3. Other Comment

Date [mm/dd/yyyy]: _______________________________

Client’s Print Name: _______________________________

Client’s Signature: _________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .