35078 Addendum 1.docx
DOCX document 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ODOT Account Manager for OreGo Road Usage Charge
- Solicitation number
- S-73000-00001203
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an addendum to a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for an ODOT Account Manager for the OreGo Road Usage Charge program. The purpose of this addendum is to correct a math error in the point and score calculations section of the RFP. The total points possible for the evaluation criteria have been reduced from 150 to 125 (or from 200 to 175 if goods testing is conducted). The RFP solicits proposals for an account manager to support the OreGo program, which is a road usage charge program in the state of Oregon. The contract will serve Clackamas County and the city of Salem.
The RFP outlines the evaluation criteria, which include compliance with technical requirements, proposers' relevant past performance, programmatic qualifications, and viable additional features. Pricing will also be evaluated. Proposals will be ranked based on the average scores from the evaluation panel. No other changes have been made to the RFP document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 35078 Attachment A_Sample PA.docx | DOCX document | |
| 35078 Attachment B_Program Requirements Document.pdf | ||
| 35078 Attachment E_Pilot Management Expectations.docx | DOCX document | |
| 35078 Attachment H_Sample WOC.docx | DOCX document | |
| 35078 Attachment D_Service Level Agreement.pdf | ||
| 35078 Attachment I_Proposer Information and Certification Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| 35078 Attachment K_Responsibility Inquiry.docx | DOCX document | |
| 35078 Attachment L_COBID_DBE Goals.docx | DOCX document | |
| 35078 Attachment M_Price Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 35078 Attachment C_Interface Control Document.pdf | ||
| 35078 Attachment F_Verification Cross Reference Index.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 35078 Attachment G_Road Usage Charge Rate Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 35078 Attachment J_Disclosure Exemption Certification.doc | DOC document | |
| 35078 OAM RFP.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Form S003-B080715
ODOT Procurement Office, MS# 2-2 3930 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Salem, OR 97302-1166
Telephone: 503-986-2920
FAX: (503) 986-5790
Email: Erin.E.Lucas@odot.oregon.gov
| Date: | 08/31/2022 |
| To: | RFP#35078/Bid Solicitation Number: S-73000-00001203 Proposers |
| From: | Erin Lucas, Procurement and Contracts Specialist |
| Re: | RFP#35078/Bid Solicitation Number: S-73000-00001203 |
odot ACCOUNT MANAGER FOR OREGO ROAD USAGE CHARGE
ADDENDUM #1
to RFP#35078/Bid Solicitation Number: S-73000-00001203
This Addendum modifies the Request for Proposal (RFP) document(s) only to the extent indicated herein. All other areas not changed or otherwise modified by this Addendum shall remain in full force and effect. This Addendum is hereby made an integral part of the RFP document. Proposer must be responsive to any requirements of this Addendum as if the requirements were set forth in the RFP. Failure to do so may result in Proposal rejection. See the RFP regarding requests for clarification or change and protests of this Addendum, and the deadlines for the foregoing.
The purpose of this Addendum is to: Correct a math error in section 3.11 Point and Score Calculations.
Added text is indicated by bold underlined font, deleted text is indicated by strikethrough font.
3.11 POINT AND SCORE CALCULATIONS
The Purchaser will average the scores for the Evaluation Criteria (including the scores for the presentations, if conducted). The average scores will be calculated by totaling the points awarded by each Evaluation Panel member and dividing by the number of members). ODOT will then determine the rank order for each Proposal, with the highest scoring Proposal receiving the highest rank and each successive rank order determined by the next highest score.
The price score for each Proposal is calculated by the Purchaser as stated in section 3.6 - Price Evaluation.
| TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE |
| 150 125 (or 200 175 if Goods Testing is conducted) |
| 3.10.1 |
| Compliance with Technical Requirements |
| 35 |
| 3.10.2 |
| Proposers’ Relevant Past Performance |
| 15 |
| 3.10.3 |
| Proposers Programmatic Qualifications |
| 25 |
| 3.10.4 |
| Viable Additional Features (Optional) |
| 25 |
| 3.10.5 |
| Price Evaluation |
| 25 |
| 3.9 |
| Goods Testing (if conducted) |
| 50 |
image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .