3100-013P2583_Redacted.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-23-B-000006
About this file
This solicitation is seeking sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns for bridge replacement and repair work at Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park. The project consists of replacing three bridges, constructing a new pedestrian bridge, and repairing a box culvert. Work includes bridge removal, structural concrete and steel, timber, prefabricated steel bridge construction, micropiles, historic stone masonry repair, and approach reconstruction. The project will be split into multiple schedules with a total cost expected between $2 million to $5 million. Bids are due in January 2023 as specified on the SF1442 included in the solicitation documents, which are available for download on SAM.gov. Bidders must complete annual representations and certifications on SAM.gov and at http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm. The solicitation is being conducted by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for work at Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE
LITTLE ORLEANS ACCESS ROAD OVER C&O CANAL
C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
LOOKING SOUTH
STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 10/21/2021
EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/21/2021
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
3 - STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 41.1 FT (12.5 M)
8 - WOOD OR TIMBER MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 41.1 FT (12.5 M)
0 - NONE DECK WIDTH: ..................... 12.0 FT (3.7 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 10.0 FT (3 M)
6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:
1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 1995
000000000000 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
1995-DECK PLANKS REPLACED. 2003, 2010-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED.
LOCATION
C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 140.90 (KM PT 42.95)
STATE: .............................. 243 - MARYLAND LOCATION: .... Little Orleans Campground. Take Old Town Road to Orleans Road to HighFACILITY CARRIED: ......... LITTLE ORLEANS ACCESS Germany Road.
FEATURE INTERSECTED: C&O CANAL
INSPECTION TEAM: N. Hughes, R. Silvestry
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Reinaldo Silvestry
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/07/2022
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. Main problem at this time continue to be the ongoing deterioration of the superstructure, including paint failure, rusting, and section loss from bottom flanges and lower portions of webs at steel beams. Additionally, the bearing hardware at the abutments exhibit section loss from the anchor bolts and nuts.
Additional problems include bulging of the elastomeric bearing pads; moderate soil and debris accumulation on the timber deck and abutment bearing seats; and spalling with exposed rebar on the north abutment backwall. There is also gravel and debris accumulation along the timber deck and curbs.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. It should be mentioned that this structure should be posted.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/21/2021
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.7,60.3
PERIODICALLY REMOVE SOIL AND DEBRIS FROM DECK
SURFACE AND ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. 1 LS
222.7
POST BRIDGE FOR 11 TONS.
1 LS
60.7
CLEAR WEEP HOLES AT NORTH ABUTMENT.
1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
59.2,59.6, 59.7
CLEAN AND PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL.
1 LS
222.4 REPAVE NORTH APPROACH.
1 LS
59.1 REPLACE ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS AND
ANCHOR BOLTS AND NUTS. 1 LS
60.4 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH
ABUTMENT BACKWALL WITH APPROVED
SEALANT.
1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)
PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/21/2021
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/20/2021
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
F
F
G
N
F
G
N
P
P
N
N
N
P
P
N
F
G
N
G
G
N
F
N
1- SUFF
5 - DRY
N
N
N
G
F
N
G
N
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS N
3. WEARING SURFACE N
N 4 FT
G
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
SILT
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS F
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES F
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION N
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
N
N
N
N
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
16.FOUNDATIONS
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1 MINOR CHECKING OF NAIL-LAMINATED TIMBER DECK; MODERATE ABRASION AND WEAR OF DECK SURFACE. RUTTING OF DECK
SURFACE ALONG WHEEL PATH.
TOP OF TIMBER PLANK SPLIT AT EAST SIDE NEAR NORTH END. MINOR SPLINTERING OF DECK TIMBERS ALONG EDGES WITH
MINOR DECAY AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
58.5
58.7
MINOR CHECKING OF TIMBER CURBS; MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE WITH SEVERAL VEHICLE SCRAPES.
MODERATE TO SEVERE SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES; MODERATE ALONG CENTERLINE. 3/4” WIDE GAP BETWEEN DECK AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL ALLOWS DRAINAGE ONTO SUPERSTRUCTURE AND BEARING SEATS.
59.1 MINOR TO MODERATE BULGING OF ELASTOMERIC PADS; PADS OVERHANG ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS UP TO 1-1/4". SEVERE
SECTION LOSS FROM ANCHOR BOLTS (UP TO 75%) AND NUTS (UP TO 100%).
59.2
59.6
59.7
STRUCTURAL STEEL HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN PAINTED. BEAM ENDS BEHIND DIAPHRAGMS AND BACKSIDE OF END DIAPHRAGMS WERE NOT PAINTED. MODERATE RUSTING THROUGHOUT WITH SEVERE SECTION LOSS (1/4” REMAINING, 9/16” ORIGINAL THICKNESS) FROM BOTTOM FLANGES. WIDESPREAD CORROSION WITH MODERATE SECTION LOSS ON FLANGES AND LOWER
PORTIONS OF BEAM WEBS PREDATING PAINT.
DIAPHRAGMS WELDED TO BOTTOM FLANGES OF BEAMS AT MIDSPAN. MODERATE RUSTING ON BACKSIDE OF END
DIAPHRAGMS.
59.9 TIMBER CRIBBING PLACED AT MIDSPAN; HOWEVER, CRIBBING DOES NOT PROVIDE BEARING FOR SUPERSTRUCTURE. SLIGHT
SAG IN BEAM #4 UNDER DEAD LOAD.
60.1
60.3
EXPOSED FORM TIES PROTRUDING FROM ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.
MODERATE TO HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BOTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS.
60.4 SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT BOTH ENDS OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL. 18"L HONEYCOMBED AREA WITH EXPOSED
REBAR ON NORTH BACKWALL, BETWEEN BEAMS #2 AND #3.
60.6 MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO ROADWAY FACES OF WINGWALLS.
60.7 WEEP HOLES FULLY BURIED AT NORTH ABUTMENT.
61.2
61.4
TIMBER CRIBBING PLACED IN CHANNEL, NOT IN CONTACT WITH SUPERSTRUCTURE.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
222.4
222.5
NORTH APPROACH IS DETERIORATED WITH POTHOLES AND STABILIZED SOIL MIGRATING ONTO DECK. MINOR EROSION AT
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL END.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 8 7 14 13
HS 12 11 20 18
TYPE 3 10 9 18 16
TYPE 3S2 16 15 28 25
TYPE 3-3 21 19 35 32
DESIGN LOADING: 4 - H 20
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 02/18/2021
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: EXTERIOR BEAMS
REMARKS: THIS BRIDGE REQUIRES POSTING FOR THE LEGAL VEHICLES: TYPE 3(18 TONS), TYPE 3S2 (28 TONS), AND TYPE 3-3 (35 TONS) VEHICLES. THE OPERATING RATING FACTORS FOR THE SU4, SU5, SU6, SU7, EV2, AND EV3 ARE ALL BELOW 1.0.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........3100-013 P
2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
243 - MARYLAND
24001 ALLEGANY
00000
1 6 4 00206 0
C&O CANAL
LITTLE ORLEANS ACCESS ROAD
3100013P0000000
Little Orleans Campground. Take Old Town Road to Orleans Road to High Germany Road.
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
140.9 (KM PT: 42.95)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
GIRDER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............41.1 FT ( 12.5 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 41.1 FT ( 12.5 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 8 - WOOD OR TIMBER
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................4 - H 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............20.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 18.6
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............36 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/21/2021 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
https://RATING:
https://LENGTH:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 39° 37'33 29" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 10.0 FT ( 3 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 78°23 '09.14" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 0 MI ( 0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 11.0 FT ( 3.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 11.0 FT ( 3.4 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............72 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2007 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................79 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 10 FT ( 3 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2027 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
4 - CURB-TYPE WHEEL GUARD(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 7 - T MBER
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... .96 FT ( 0 29 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 5 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............4 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................8 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: N N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1995-DECK PLANKS REPLACED. 2003, 2010-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 3100013P0000000
Inspection Date: 10/21/2021 Facility Carried: LITTLE ORLEANS ACC
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description NORTH APPROACH; NOTE GRAVEL ACCUMULATION
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description SPALLING DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO 8
Description WEST CURB; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG AND UNDER CURB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description SPLITTING AND DECAYING OF DECK ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH END
PHOTO 10
Description WEST CURB NEAR MIDSPAN; NOTE TYPICAL CHECKING OF TIMBER CURBS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT SOUTH END
PHOTO 12
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description SOUTHEAST WINGWALL
PHOTO 14
Description SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description WEST BEARING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF
BOTTOM FLANGE, BOTTOM PORTION OF WEB, AND FULL SECTION LOSS OF ANCHOR
BOLTS AND NUTS
PHOTO 16
Description SOUTH BEARING AREA BETWEEN BEAMS #3 AND #4; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 18
Description EAST EXTERIOR BEAM; NOTE TYPICAL RUSTING AND SECTION LOSS ALONG BOTTOM
FLANGE AND BOTTOM PORTION OF WEB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEAM BOTTOM FLANGE AND WEB; NOTE PAINT FAILURE, RUSTING, AND SECTION LOSS
PHOTO 20
Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING NORTH BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND #2 FROM MIDSPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 22
Description EXTERIOR OF WEST BEAM LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF
BOTTOM FLANGE AND WEB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 24
Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST END OF NORTH BACKWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description EAST BEARING AREA OVER NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND
SECTION LOSS OF ANCHOR BOLT NUTS
PHOTO 26
Description NORTH BEARING #1; NOTE PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF BEAM END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL; NOTE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR
PHOTO 28
Description NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL BETWEEN BEAMS #2 AND #3; NOTE HONEYCOMBING AND
EXPOSED REBAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO 30
Description NORTHEAST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO 32
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .