3100-013P2583_Redacted.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park
Solicitation number
693C73-23-B-000006
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is seeking sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns for bridge replacement and repair work at Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park. The project consists of replacing three bridges, constructing a new pedestrian bridge, and repairing a box culvert. Work includes bridge removal, structural concrete and steel, timber, prefabricated steel bridge construction, micropiles, historic stone masonry repair, and approach reconstruction. The project will be split into multiple schedules with a total cost expected between $2 million to $5 million. Bids are due in January 2023 as specified on the SF1442 included in the solicitation documents, which are available for download on SAM.gov. Bidders must complete annual representations and certifications on SAM.gov and at http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm. The solicitation is being conducted by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for work at Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park.

View the file

Other files

Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE

LITTLE ORLEANS ACCESS ROAD OVER C&O CANAL

C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/21/2021

EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/21/2021

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

3 - STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 41.1 FT (12.5 M)

8 - WOOD OR TIMBER MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 41.1 FT (12.5 M)

0 - NONE DECK WIDTH: ..................... 12.0 FT (3.7 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 10.0 FT (3 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 1995

000000000000 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1995-DECK PLANKS REPLACED. 2003, 2010-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED.

LOCATION

C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 140.90 (KM PT 42.95)

STATE: .............................. 243 - MARYLAND LOCATION: .... Little Orleans Campground. Take Old Town Road to Orleans Road to HighFACILITY CARRIED: ......... LITTLE ORLEANS ACCESS Germany Road.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: C&O CANAL

INSPECTION TEAM: N. Hughes, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/07/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. Main problem at this time continue to be the ongoing deterioration of the superstructure, including paint failure, rusting, and section loss from bottom flanges and lower portions of webs at steel beams. Additionally, the bearing hardware at the abutments exhibit section loss from the anchor bolts and nuts.

Additional problems include bulging of the elastomeric bearing pads; moderate soil and debris accumulation on the timber deck and abutment bearing seats; and spalling with exposed rebar on the north abutment backwall. There is also gravel and debris accumulation along the timber deck and curbs.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. It should be mentioned that this structure should be posted.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/21/2021

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7,60.3

PERIODICALLY REMOVE SOIL AND DEBRIS FROM DECK

SURFACE AND ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. 1 LS

222.7

POST BRIDGE FOR 11 TONS.

1 LS

60.7

CLEAR WEEP HOLES AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

59.2,59.6, 59.7

CLEAN AND PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL.

1 LS

222.4 REPAVE NORTH APPROACH.

1 LS

59.1 REPLACE ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS AND

ANCHOR BOLTS AND NUTS. 1 LS

60.4 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH

ABUTMENT BACKWALL WITH APPROVED

SEALANT.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)

PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/21/2021

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/20/2021

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

F

G

N

F

G

N

P

P

N

N

N

P

P

N

F

G

N

G

G

N

F

N

1- SUFF

5 - DRY

N

N

N

G

F

N

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE N

N 4 FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SILT

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS F

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES F

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1 MINOR CHECKING OF NAIL-LAMINATED TIMBER DECK; MODERATE ABRASION AND WEAR OF DECK SURFACE. RUTTING OF DECK

SURFACE ALONG WHEEL PATH.

TOP OF TIMBER PLANK SPLIT AT EAST SIDE NEAR NORTH END. MINOR SPLINTERING OF DECK TIMBERS ALONG EDGES WITH

MINOR DECAY AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

58.5

58.7

MINOR CHECKING OF TIMBER CURBS; MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE WITH SEVERAL VEHICLE SCRAPES.

MODERATE TO SEVERE SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES; MODERATE ALONG CENTERLINE. 3/4” WIDE GAP BETWEEN DECK AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL ALLOWS DRAINAGE ONTO SUPERSTRUCTURE AND BEARING SEATS.

59.1 MINOR TO MODERATE BULGING OF ELASTOMERIC PADS; PADS OVERHANG ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS UP TO 1-1/4". SEVERE

SECTION LOSS FROM ANCHOR BOLTS (UP TO 75%) AND NUTS (UP TO 100%).

59.2

59.6

59.7

STRUCTURAL STEEL HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN PAINTED. BEAM ENDS BEHIND DIAPHRAGMS AND BACKSIDE OF END DIAPHRAGMS WERE NOT PAINTED. MODERATE RUSTING THROUGHOUT WITH SEVERE SECTION LOSS (1/4” REMAINING, 9/16” ORIGINAL THICKNESS) FROM BOTTOM FLANGES. WIDESPREAD CORROSION WITH MODERATE SECTION LOSS ON FLANGES AND LOWER

PORTIONS OF BEAM WEBS PREDATING PAINT.

DIAPHRAGMS WELDED TO BOTTOM FLANGES OF BEAMS AT MIDSPAN. MODERATE RUSTING ON BACKSIDE OF END

DIAPHRAGMS.

59.9 TIMBER CRIBBING PLACED AT MIDSPAN; HOWEVER, CRIBBING DOES NOT PROVIDE BEARING FOR SUPERSTRUCTURE. SLIGHT

SAG IN BEAM #4 UNDER DEAD LOAD.

60.1

60.3

EXPOSED FORM TIES PROTRUDING FROM ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

MODERATE TO HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BOTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS.

60.4 SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT BOTH ENDS OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL. 18"L HONEYCOMBED AREA WITH EXPOSED

REBAR ON NORTH BACKWALL, BETWEEN BEAMS #2 AND #3.

60.6 MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO ROADWAY FACES OF WINGWALLS.

60.7 WEEP HOLES FULLY BURIED AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

61.2

61.4

TIMBER CRIBBING PLACED IN CHANNEL, NOT IN CONTACT WITH SUPERSTRUCTURE.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

222.4

222.5

NORTH APPROACH IS DETERIORATED WITH POTHOLES AND STABILIZED SOIL MIGRATING ONTO DECK. MINOR EROSION AT

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL END.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 8 7 14 13

HS 12 11 20 18

TYPE 3 10 9 18 16

TYPE 3S2 16 15 28 25

TYPE 3-3 21 19 35 32

DESIGN LOADING: 4 - H 20

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 02/18/2021

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: EXTERIOR BEAMS

REMARKS: THIS BRIDGE REQUIRES POSTING FOR THE LEGAL VEHICLES: TYPE 3(18 TONS), TYPE 3S2 (28 TONS), AND TYPE 3-3 (35 TONS) VEHICLES. THE OPERATING RATING FACTORS FOR THE SU4, SU5, SU6, SU7, EV2, AND EV3 ARE ALL BELOW 1.0.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............FIFTEEN MILE CREEK BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........3100-013 P

2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

243 - MARYLAND

24001 ALLEGANY

00000

1 6 4 00206 0

C&O CANAL

LITTLE ORLEANS ACCESS ROAD

3100013P0000000

Little Orleans Campground. Take Old Town Road to Orleans Road to High Germany Road.

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

140.9 (KM PT: 42.95)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............41.1 FT ( 12.5 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 41.1 FT ( 12.5 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 8 - WOOD OR TIMBER

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................4 - H 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............20.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 18.6

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............36 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/21/2021 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3100-013P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 39° 37'33 29" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 10.0 FT ( 3 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 78°23 '09.14" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 0 MI ( 0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 11.0 FT ( 3.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 11.0 FT ( 3.4 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............72 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2007 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................79 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 10 FT ( 3 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2027 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

4 - CURB-TYPE WHEEL GUARD(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 7 - T MBER

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... .96 FT ( 0 29 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 5 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............4 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................8 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: N N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1995-DECK PLANKS REPLACED. 2003, 2010-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 3100013P0000000

Inspection Date: 10/21/2021 Facility Carried: LITTLE ORLEANS ACC

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 6

Description NORTH APPROACH; NOTE GRAVEL ACCUMULATION

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description SPALLING DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO 8

Description WEST CURB; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG AND UNDER CURB

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description SPLITTING AND DECAYING OF DECK ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH END

PHOTO 10

Description WEST CURB NEAR MIDSPAN; NOTE TYPICAL CHECKING OF TIMBER CURBS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT SOUTH END

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO 14

Description SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description WEST BEARING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF

BOTTOM FLANGE, BOTTOM PORTION OF WEB, AND FULL SECTION LOSS OF ANCHOR

BOLTS AND NUTS

PHOTO 16

Description SOUTH BEARING AREA BETWEEN BEAMS #3 AND #4; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 18

Description EAST EXTERIOR BEAM; NOTE TYPICAL RUSTING AND SECTION LOSS ALONG BOTTOM

FLANGE AND BOTTOM PORTION OF WEB

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEAM BOTTOM FLANGE AND WEB; NOTE PAINT FAILURE, RUSTING, AND SECTION LOSS

PHOTO 20

Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING NORTH BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND #2 FROM MIDSPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 22

Description EXTERIOR OF WEST BEAM LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF

BOTTOM FLANGE AND WEB

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 24

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST END OF NORTH BACKWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description EAST BEARING AREA OVER NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND

SECTION LOSS OF ANCHOR BOLT NUTS

PHOTO 26

Description NORTH BEARING #1; NOTE PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF BEAM END

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL; NOTE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

PHOTO 28

Description NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL BETWEEN BEAMS #2 AND #3; NOTE HONEYCOMBING AND

EXPOSED REBAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO 30

Description NORTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO 32

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .