3-Addendum 01 03SEP2026 signed.pdf

Addendum No. 01

NOTICE

TO: All RFQ holders

DATE: September 3, 2026

FROM: Jason Draper, P.E.

Chief Engineer Salt Lake City Public Utilities 1805 West 500 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104

(801) 483-6840 FAX (801) 483-6818

SUBJECT: Addendum No. 01 to the RFQ Documents for Professional Services On-Call FY2027, Project No. 513505689

Transmitted herewith is ADDENDUM No. 01 to the Request for Qualification documents for the above-mentioned project.

Jason Draper (Sep 3, 2026 15:06:56 MDT) Jason Draper https://secure.na1.documents.adobe.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA0g9PN7wKIQl4MfYWQMfk2o97CxZPO9iV

Addendum No. 01

ADDENDUM No. 01

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 DOCUMENT INCLUDES

A. Changes to the Request for Qualification documents.

1.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

A. Professional Services On-Call FY2027

B. Project No. 513505688

C. Date: September 3, 2026

PART 2 CHANGES

2.1 CHANGES TO PRIOR ADDENDA

A. NONE

2.2 CHANGES TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS

A. SCHEDULE

2.3 CHANGES TO AGREEMENT AND OTHER CONTRACT FORMS

A. NONE

END OF ADDENDUM

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Professional Services On-Call FY2027

(SLCDPU Project No. 513505688) September 3, 2026

Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) is requesting Statements of Interest and Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified consulting firms (Consultants) to provide professional services in one or more of the following service categories. When submitting an SOQ for a specific service category (bold), the Consultant must address the professional service subcategories (indented) listed under that category.

Sewer Collection o Gravity Sewers o Force Mains o Trenchless Solutions and Rehabilitation Methods o Lift Stations o Condition Assessments o Design Support Services for each subcategory above o Construction Phase Support Services

Sewer Reclamation o Primary and Secondary Treatment o Disinfection o Tertiary Treatment o Biosolids and Odor Control o Ancillary and support systems (e.g., yard piping, pumping, stormwater) o Design Support Services for each subcategory above o Construction Phase Support Services o Water Quality Studies

Water Distribution o Water Mains o Pump Stations o Distribution Tanks and Reservoirs o Wells o Secondary water o Condition Assessment o Design Support Services for each subcategory above o Construction Phase Support Services

Water Treatment o Treatment Plants o Chemical treatment facilities o Design Support Services for each subcategory above o Construction Phase Support Services o Water Quality

Stormwater o Open Channel/Embankment o Storm Drains/Culverts o Lift Stations o Riparian Projects

(SLCDPU Project # 513505688) August 24, 2026 o Water Quality o Design Support Services for each subcategory above o Construction Phase Support Services

Geotechnical o Subsurface Exploration and Characterization o Material Testing, Reporting, and Assessments o Trenchless Methods o Slope Stability o Dam Engineering and Operations

Environmental and Restoration o Environmental Site Assessments o Water Sampling, Reporting, and Assessments o Remediation Studies and Oversight o Erosion Control and Site Stabilization, Restoration, and Revegetation o Permitting Support and Monitoring Plans

Electrical o Sewer Collection o Sewer Reclamation o Water Distribution o Water Treatment o Stormwater o Utility systems

Public Engagement o Sewer Collection o Sewer Reclamation o Water Distribution o Water Quality and Treatment o Stormwater o Public Utilities

Development Review o Technical Plan Review Services o Construction Phase Support Services for Development Projects o Floodplain Development Permit Application Review o Riparian Corridor Permit Application Review o SWPPP Review

Property Procurement o Property Research, Due Diligence, and Procurement Support o Project Management o Wetland Delineation Review o Surveys

Consultant is NOT required to include all of the (Bold) listed service categories in the SOQ.

Any number from one through ten service categories can be submitted.

PURPOSE AND NEED

SLCDPU is using this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to identify Consultants qualified to provide services in one or more of the categories listed above. Consultants selected for one or more service categories are expected to execute a “Professional Services On-Call Agreement” (Agreement) with Salt Lake City (City) for each selected service category.

Execution of the Agreement allows the SLCDPU to authorize Task Orders as needed to perform work in the service category. The maximum total fee of the Agreement available for potential authorization through multiple Task Orders is two million dollars ($2,000,000) per service category. The maximum fee for an individual Task Order authorized under the terms of the Agreement is two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000).

The Agreement shall begin on the date of execution of the Agreement and remain in effect for two (2) years from that date. The City has the option to renew the Agreement for three (3) additional one (1) year terms.

The Agreement does not guarantee Consultant any volume or duration of work nor does it guarantee that work will be assigned to Consultant.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

For the SOQ to be considered, submit one (1) electronic copy no later than 2:00 PM on Wednesday, September 1630, 2026, through the U3P Utah Public Procurement Place project site.

Instructions: Compile your cover sheet, proposal criteria responses, and any other correspondence into one single PDF file. Responses must be uploaded, and the electronic submission completed by the time and date specified. After uploading your response file, offerors MUST go to "Review and Submit" and click "SUBMIT RESPONSE" to complete the process.

Responses submitted electronically through U3P require uploading of electronic attachments.

U3P will accept a wide variety of document types such as Word, Excel, and PDF attachments but not all. You MAY NOT submit documents that are embedded (zip files), movies, wmp and mp3 files or password protected files, etc. Such actions may cause your proposal to be deemed as "non-responsive".

The consultant shall use the Content of Submission as a reference for the initial submission.

Consultant’s submission must follow these requirements:

Submit all required information as defined in the subsection Content of Submission in this RFQ.

Submit via U3P one (1) electronic response in PDF format.

Label the submitted file “Professional Services On-Call Agreement, SLC Department of

Public Utilities” and the submission deadline date.

Submission deadline is 2:00 PM on Wednesday, September 1630, 2026. Responses received after the 2:00 pm deadline will not be placed in the file unopened and will not be considered.

Format of Submission

The SOQ shall be submitted on 8 ½-inch x 11-inch portrait format with one-inch (1”) margins on top, bottom, left, and right. Georgia (or similar) 11-point (or larger) font shall be used for all text.

A cover sheet and table of contents shall be provided, but will not be counted against the total page limit. Résumés may be attached as an Appendix and are not counted against the total page limit.

The page count shall not exceed the following limits.

Twelve (12) pages: SOQ for one (1) service category Fourteen (14) pages: SOQ for two (2) service categories Sixteen (16) pages: SOQ for three (3) service categories Eighteen (18) pages: SOQ for four (4) service categories Twenty (20) pages: SOQ for five (5) service categories Twenty-two (22) pages: SOQ for six (6) services categories Twenty-four (24) pages: SOQ for seven (7) services categories Twenty-six (26) pages: SOQ for eight (8) service categories Twenty-eight (28) pages: SOQ for nine (9) service categories Thirty (30) pages: SOQ for ten (10) service categories

The response shall be signed by an officer or employee of the Consultant authorized to bind the Consultant contractually.

Content of Submission

Please provide the following information in the sequence listed below:

i. Cover Sheet including Statement of Interest stating name of firm or team and signed by an official authorized to bind the firm. (The cover sheet is not counted against the page limit.)

ii. Table of Contents (The Table of Contents is not counted against the page limit.)

iii. Service Categories

A. (Insert category name. Repeat this section structure for each Service Category that Consultant requests for consideration. Consultant is NOT required to include all of the listed service categories in the SOQ; however, each subcategory of the service categories included must be addressed.)

i) Consultant’s Experience & Qualifications

ii) Describe the team’s organizational structure, the location of the office where staff will be located to manage this effort, and any other pertinent information.

iii) Describe the team’s experience and documentable performance of other projects similar in size and scope to the requested services. The project descriptions should clearly demonstrate the capability of the team to perform the services.

iv) Key Personnel Experience and Qualifications

(1) Provide a description of individual experts or key team member’s professional experience and specializations related to the service category, and a summary of each member’s qualifications, education degrees, certifications, professional licensees, etc.

(2) If applicable, identify any services Consultant intends to subcontract to others and identify the proposed subcontractors including names, specific assignments, and the qualifications of the subcontracting firm and its key personnel.

Subcontractors will have to be approved by SLCDPU for each Task Order.

v) Provide the names and contact information of at least three (3) references for your firm’s or team’s professional capabilities in providing similar services requested in this RFQ for similar clients of similar size. Also include dates of performance.

b) Rate Schedule

i) The rate schedule will consist of proposed rates for likely staff categories listed with rates for each. Rate schedule will apply to the two-year period of the Agreement.

iii. Other Required Information & Materials

A. A statement of whether your firm or any of your proposed subcontractors is currently involved in arbitration or litigation for any reason. If so, please elaborate.

B. A statement of whether your firm or any of your proposed subcontractors have ever filed for reorganization or bankruptcy. If so, please elaborate.

C. Include a statement indicating that the firm will comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement (attached), including the insurance requirements listed in this document.

D. Exceptions. If you have any exceptions to any of the terms, conditions, or requirements of this RFQ or the attached Agreement they must be identified and included in response to this RFQ. Exceptions or deviations to any of the terms, conditions, or requirements must not be added to the SOQ pages but must be submitted in a separate document accompanying consultant’s response identified as “Exceptions.” Such exceptions shall be considered in the evaluation and the award processes. SLCDPU shall be the sole determiner of the acceptability of any exception. Include a response to this item stating whether you have, or have not, included any exceptions.

E. Electronic payment. The City is encouraging consultants to accept electronic payments using a process whereby vendors can receive payments and remittance advices electronically. Please provide information relating to: (1) your ability to accept electronic payments and remittance advices; (2) your policy, if any, regarding electronic payments and (3) your discount, if any, for electronic payments.

F. Salt Lake City’s Ethics Requirement o Include the following two paragraphs in your response and then add your own written acknowledgement that you have read the paragraphs and agree to comply with their terms.

REPRESENTATION REGARDING ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR SALT LAKE

CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AND FORMER CITY OFFICERS AND

EMPLOYEES

The respondent represents that it has not: (1) provided an illegal gift or payoff to a Salt Lake City officer or employee or former City officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity; (2) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of securing business; (3) knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in the City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code; or (4) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly influence, a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth in the City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code.

Pursuant to the foregoing, it is the City’s policy that City employees are prohibited from personally accepting gifts, incentives, and marketing or promotional items from suppliers and those suppliers shall not offer such items to City employees. Such offers from suppliers are inappropriate and may result in suspension or debarment of the supplier from the City’s procurement processes.

Appendix A. Résumés (Not counted against the total page limit)

SELECTION PROCESS

SLCDPU requests responses from consultants possessing the necessary qualifications, experience, and ability to complete the desired services.

Complete submissions from interested and qualified consultants will be reviewed by an internal selection committee at SLCDPU. Based on the criteria outlined in this RFQ, the committee will determine the Consultants in each Service Category that meet SLCDPU’s objectives. At

SLCDPU’s sole discretion, interviews may be requested with some Consultants during the selection process.

SLCDPU will evaluate SOQs based on completeness, qualifications and experience, and overall value to SLCDPU. The specific criteria used to select Consultant for the Agreement will include the following:

1. Consultant’s qualifications and experience performing the requested services.

2. Response and availability, experience, and qualifications of key personnel performing the services.

3. Experience performing service subcategories.

4. Feedback from references.

5. Overall quality of the SOQ.

SLCDPU will be the sole judge as to which SOQs best meet the selection criteria. SLCDPU reserves, at its sole discretion, the right to reject any or all responses received, to waive any submission requirements contained within this RFQ, or to waive any irregularities in any submitted SOQ.

The process for the selection of Consultant for the Agreement(s) will be as follows:

1. Response to RFQ: Responsive SOQ submissions from interested Consultants will be reviewed by an internal committee at SLCDPU. Submissions will be evaluated and compared for each Service Category.

2. Selection: SLCDPU may award based upon the SOQs or may also elect to interview any or all of those who respond to the RFQ. SLCDPU reserves the right to select multiple Consultants for each Service Category, and/or reject all submissions and not select any Consultant for a Service Category.

3. Contract negotiation and award between the selected Consultants and SLCDPU:

Selected Consultants will submit a finalized, negotiated rate schedule, in the format requested by SLCDPU, with likely staff categories listed with rates for each category as defined in the Agreement.

Individual Task Orders will be issued as needed by SLCDPU. For Task Orders related to a Service Category with more than one Consultant Agreement, the decision process for assigning the Task Orders will be as follows.

1. An internal SLCDPU committee will review the draft Task Order with focus on the needed subcategories of services.

2. If there is a clear advantage for the needed subcategories for a Consultant, that Consultant will be recommended to perform the Task Order, subject to staff availability and remaining funds in the Agreement.

a. Note that significant changes in staff or Consultant performance on other projects may be considered in Task Order authorization.

3. If one or more Consultants with Agreements for the same Service Category are deemed equally qualified in the needed subcategories, the following priorities will guide the Task Order authorization decision.

a. Consultant that has not yet received a Task Order authorization.

b. Consultant that has received a Task Order authorization, but less recently than the other Consultants being considered.

SCHEDULE

SLCDPU reserves the right to change any dates and/or deadlines.

Issue RFQ August 24, 2026

Responses Due September 1630, 2026

Selection of Consultant September 23October 7, Negotiate Contract September 30October 14, Signature Process and Agreement Award October 721, 2026

It is the Consultant’s responsibility to assure delivery of its submittal to SLCDPU prior to or at the designated date and time. Consultants will not be entitled to withdraw or amend their statement of qualifications once submitted to SLCDPU.

SLCDPU reserves the right to request clarification of any item in a team’s response or to request additional information necessary to properly evaluate particular qualifications. All requests for clarification and responses shall be in writing.

Confidentiality

All responses, inquiries, and correspondence relating to this RFP and all reports, charts, displays, schedules, exhibits, and other documentation produced by the offeror that are submitted to the City, as part of the proposal or otherwise, shall become the property of the City when received by the City and may be considered public information under applicable law. The City is subject to the disclosure requirements of the Government Records Access and Management Act, Title 63G, Chapter 2, Utah Code Annotated (“GRAMA”). The City generally considers proposals and all accompanying material to be public and subject to disclosure. Any material considered by the offeror to be proprietary must be accompanied by a written claim of business confidentiality containing a concise written statement of reasons supporting the claim. Blanket claims that the entire RFP is confidential will be denied. The City cannot guarantee that any information will be held confidential. If the offeror makes a claim of business confidentiality, the City, upon receipt of a request for disclosure, will determine whether the material should be classified as public or nonpublic, and will notify the offeror of such determination. The offeror is entitled under GRAMA to appeal an adverse determination. The City is not obligated to notify the offeror of a request to see the offeror’s proposal, and will not consider a claim of confidentiality, unless the offeror's claim of confidentiality is made in a timely basis and in accordance with GRAMA.

Addendum 01 Final Audit Report 2026-09-03

Created: 2026-09-03

By: Amanda Nave (amanda.nave@slc.gov)

Status: Signed

Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA0g9PN7wKIQl4MfYWQMfk2o97CxZPO9iV

"Addendum 01" History Document created by Amanda Nave (amanda.nave@slc.gov)

2026-09-03 - 8:48:28 PM GMT

Document emailed to jason.draper@slc.gov for signature

2026-09-03 - 8:49:39 PM GMT

Email viewed by jason.draper@slc.gov

2026-09-03 - 9:06:11 PM GMT

Signer jason.draper@slc.gov entered name at signing as Jason Draper

2026-09-03 - 9:06:54 PM GMT

Document e-signed by Jason Draper (jason.draper@slc.gov) Signature Date: 2026-09-03 - 9:06:56 PM GMT - Time Source: server - Signature Appearance Selected: TYPE

Agreement completed.

2026-09-03 - 9:06:56 PM GMT