3-3-RFP - Score Sheet - Underwriter Services 2026.pdf
PDF 125 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SLCAIR26018
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for bond underwriting services issued by Salt Lake City Corporation's Department of Airports for Salt Lake City International Airport, designated as Solicitation #SLCAIR26018. The scoresheet establishes the evaluation framework for assessing proposals from qualified underwriting firms seeking to join a pool of bond underwriters for the airport.
The evaluation methodology employs a 0-5 scoring scale, where 0 represents failure to address requirements and 5 represents excellence in exceeding all requirements. Technical criteria are weighted across three categories: Qualifications of Respondent (40% weight, 40 points), Qualifications of Individuals Assigned (35% weight, 35 points), and Understanding of Key Financing Issues (25% weight, 25 points), for a combined total of 100 points valued at $500. Proposals must first satisfy minimum mandatory requirements in senior manager qualifications and RFP Section 3.B as pass/fail thresholds before technical scoring is applied. The total available technical points are 325, with evaluators assessing each criterion individually and assigning corresponding point values based on the five-level scoring rubric. This scoresheet serves as the standardized evaluation instrument for comparing all submitted proposals and determining qualified underwriter firms for the airport's bond services pool.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-2-ATTACHMENT A - AFFIRMATION OF GRAMA.pdf | ||
| 1-1-Underwriter Services RFP - 2026 Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 3.B
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
1 6.A.1 40 40.0% 0.0 2 6.A.2 35 35.0% 0.0 3 6.A.3 25 25.0% 0.0
100.0% 500.0 0.0
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 325.00 0.00
UNDERWRITER SERVICES RFP
SOLICITATION # SLCAIR26018
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Senior Manager Qualifications
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Qualifications of Respondent Qualifications of Individuals Assigned Understanding of Key Financing Issues
Scorable Technical Criteria Total
Total Technical Points
Submittal 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .