25QE016_SOL_ATTACH2A_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Track and Field Officials, Okinawa Japan
- Solicitation number
- HE125425QE016
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for solicitation HE125425QE016 for Track & Field Officiating Services in Okinawa, Japan. The questionnaire is to be completed by offerors' references and submitted to the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) Pacific Region Office, specifically to Contract Specialist Dustin Fazzini and Contracting Officer Mileska Rodriguez.
The PPQ evaluates contractors on six key areas using a rating scale from Poor/Unsatisfactory to Excellent: knowledge and experience with sports officiating services, personnel management, training provision and tracking, timeliness of reports and deliverables, communication effectiveness, and overall performance. The template includes sections for contractor information (including CAGE code and Unique Entity ID), reference information, contract details (type, value, period of performance), and requires references to provide comments supporting their ratings in each evaluation area.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 25QE016_AMEND 2_QA.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_AMEND 2_SF30.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_AMEND 2_52.212-1.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_AMEND 1_QandA.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_AMEND 1_SF30.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_AMEND 1_52.212-1.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_SOL_1449.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_52.212-1.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_SOL_ATTACH1_PERSONNEL.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 25QE016_SOL_ATTACH3_PRICE_SHEET.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 25QE016_SOL_ATTACH2_PAST_PERF.docx | DOCX document | |
| 25QE016_52.212-2.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_SOL_ATTACH5_SCHEDULE.pdf | ||
| 25QE016_SOL_ATTACH4_PWS.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Present and Past Performance Questionnaire Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
HE125425QE016
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This Questionnaire Pertains to: Track & Field Officiating Services – Okinawa, Japan
The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the completed PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:
Department of Defense Education Activity Contract Specialist: Mr. Dustin Fazzini
DODEA PACIFIC REGION OFFICE
OPC 560 BOX 51 APO AP 96376-9001
Email: Dustin.Fazzini@dodea.edu
Contracting Officer: Ms. Mileska Rodriguez
DODEA PACIFIC REGION OFFICE
OPC 560 BOX 51 APO AP 96376-9001
Email: Mileska.Rodriguez@dodea.edu
This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.
| Contractor Information: | |
| Firm Name: Click or tap here to enter text. | N/CAGE Code: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Address: Click or tap here to enter text. | Unique Entity ID: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text. | Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text. | Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Work Performed as: ☐Prime Contractor ☐Subcontractor ☐Joint Venture ☐Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed: Click or tap here to enter text.
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #): Click or tap here to enter text.
| Reference Information: | |
| Business Name of Reference: | Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Click or tap here to enter text.
| Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text. | Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text. | Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Contract Number: Click or tap here to enter text. Final Contract Value: Click or tap here to enter text.
Contract Type: ☐Firm Fixed Price ☐Cost Reimbursement ☐Other (Explain)
Period of Performance: Click or tap here to enter text.
This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor/Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral/N/A |
| Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance. |
| Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance. |
| Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance. |
| No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available. |
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s knowledge and experience with sports officiating services? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
2. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience in appropriately managing their personnel (i.e. Has the Contractor been responsive to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections? Has the Contractor taken a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements?) Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
3. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance providing and tracking training? Comments:
| P ☒ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
4. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
5. How would you rate the Contractor’s communication? Have they communicated issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
6. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
Additional comments regarding performance from this contractor.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .