2526__Scoring_Matrix_Sheet__FINAL.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Emergency Debris Monitoring Services
- Solicitation number
- 25-26
- Issued by
- Volusia County, Florida
About this file
This is a scoring matrix for an RFP issued by the City of DeBary, Florida for Emergency Debris Monitoring Services. The matrix evaluates proposals from four firms: Critical Response Strategies, DebrisTech LLC, Thompson Consulting Services, and WSB LLC. The solicitation establishes a pre-event contract for debris monitoring services before and after disaster events such as storms or hurricanes, in accordance with FEMA, FHWA, and State of Florida regulations. The contract will generate no immediate costs to the City and represents a standby agreement activated only when debris-generating events occur.
The scoring matrix uses a 100-point evaluation system distributed across four scoring categories: responsiveness and completeness of proposals (10 points), qualifications, experience, and references (30 points), response to the scope of work (40 points), and proposal price (20 points). Final scores for the four proposers were 98 points for Thompson Consulting Services, 86.33 points for Critical Response Strategies, 82 points for DebrisTech LLC, and 73.33 points for WSB LLC. Evaluation was conducted by three reviewers: Amy Long, Carlee Shaw, and Jacob Smith, with scores averaged across all reviewers for final scoring determination.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP Scoring Matrix
| 25-26 - Emergency Debris Monitoring Services | |||||||||||
| Possible Points | All Scores | Average Final Score | Possible Points | All Scores | Average Final Score | Possible Points | All Scores | Average Final Score | Possible Points | All Scores | Average Final Score |
| Critical Response Strategies | DebrisTech LLC | Thompson Consulting Services | WSB LLC | ||||||||
| Tab 1: The responsiveness and completeness of the Proposer’s proposal. | 10 | 7 |
10 9 10 10 10 10 10 10
| 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 9 |
| 10 | 9.67 | |
| Tab 2: Qualifications, Experience, and References | ||
| 30 | 25 |
25 24.67 30 30 30 29.33 30 10 30 23 30 20
| 5 | 17 | |
| Tab 3: Response to the Scope of Work | ||
| 40 | 30 |
38 33.33 40 40 40 39 40 20 35 30.67 40 30
| 38 | 34.33 | |
| Tab 4: Proposal Price | ||
| 20 | 20 |
20 19.33 20 20 20 19.67 20 15 20 18.33 20 10 20 12.33
TOTAL POINTS FOR PROPOSAL 100 86.33 100 98 100 82 100 73.33
Amy Long
Carlee Shaw
Jacob Smith image1.png image2.png image3.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .