25-25_Individual_Scoring_Sheets-Combined_Sheets.pdf

Scoring Instructions . Each section (tab) is assigned a portion of the possible points, based on the quality and completeness of the responses provided. Reviewers should score each section using the following evaluation scale:

Rating Scale:

Excellent - Outstanding and thorough response; exceeds expectations Good - Solid response with minOf' gaps; meets expectations Average - Adequate response with noticeable gaps or limited detail Weak - Incomplete or unclear response; falls short of expectations Incomplete / Missing lnfonnation - Little to no relevant response provided

PIAaSe assian oomts accordina to the n,b,.;,. '"r Aa--h tab. The final score should refle<:t the ov--11 nnali"' cl�ri"' and '" molet<,n .. ss of lhA submicci"n nnt , .... "nmnletinn, Possible I S I Evaluator's Possible I1. 25-25 • Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Consulting Services

Evaluators Name: Richard Villasenor

Tab 2: Successful Related Experience List the projects which best illustrate the experience of the Firms which utilized the current staff which is being assigned to this Project. (List no more than 10 projects and do not list projects which were not completed by your firm or completed more than ten years ago). Include the following for each project:

A. Name and location of the project.

B. The nature of the Firm's responsibility on the project.

C. Project owner's representative name, address, telephone, and facsimile number.

D. Project user's representative name, address, and telephone number.

E. Date project was completed. Provide a comparison of the original schedule completion to the actual completion date.

F. Size of the project.

G. Cost of the project. Provide a comparison of the original contract amount with the final contract amount.

H. Work for which the Firm's staff was responsible.

I. Firm's project manager and other key professionals involved in the project and who of that staff would be assigned to the projects covered by this RFQ.

Tab 3: Proposed Prolect Staff and Function The Firms shall name the actual staff to be assigned to Projects, describe their ability and experience, and indicate the function of each within their organization and their proposed roles.

Organization Chart: Develop an organization chart as It relates to the project indicating key personnel and their relationship.

Give brief resumes of key persons to be assigned to future Projects including, but not limited to, the following:

A. Name and title.

B. Job assignment for other projects.

C. How many years with this firm? For sub-consultants, list prior projects your firm has worked with sub-consultant.

D. How many years with other Firms?

E. Experience including types of projects, size of projects (dollar value of project), and specific project involvement.

F. Education.

G. Active registrations (if any).

H. If submitting as a joint venture or partnership, include the assigned staff for the joint venture or partnership and indicate which of the joint ventures or partners employs the staff member.

Provide the location of the office(s) that will be providing the required services. Provide information on the staffing and resources of the main office providing the majority of services.

Tab 4: Financial Capabilities The Firm has sufficiently demonstrated that they have the necessary financial resources to complete projects, its capabilities to control costs and Its history of working proactively to avoid litigation with the City of Debary.

Financial Statement: For the Firms and/or their equity participants, indicate Working Capltal Ratio, Profitabillty, and Return on Assets Ratio. Include a copy of their most current audited financial statement. If the Firm is a joint venture or partnership all firms comprising the submitting entity will be required to submit the previously requested documentation. Submit the financial data as a standalone file on a USB drive.

Litigation: Submit all lltigation of any kind involving Firms, their officers, or directors with a project owner where the total amount in controversy exceeds $100,000 within the last five years. If the Firm is a joint venture or partnership, submit lltigation involving all Firms comprising the submitting entity. State the court and location of the litigation.

Insurance Claims: State the number of claims, total worker's compensation dollars incurred for those claims, and loss cost per man hour for the last five projects Firms has completed. This information should include all claims including, but limited to, the Firm's personnel, and/or sub-consultants. In addition, Firms shall include information about safety programs.

Professional Capacity: Professional liability should have limits of not less than $3,000,000 for each claim and aggregate.

Tab 5: Workload Review the Firms and their sub-consultant's current workload. If submitting as a joint venture, the City of Debary will review the current workload of each of the Firms(s) comprising the submitting entity. A maximum of five (5) points will be awarded based on an evaluation of the Firm's total workload and capacity to perform the work.

Firms and their sub-consultant(s) shall provide a list of outstanding projects, client names, the status of completion, anticipated completion date, and dollars committed to open project workload. Furthermore, if submitting as a joint venture Firms shall also include projects for each firm comprising the joint venture.

Tab 6: Minority Business Enterprise The firm must provide current documentation in their submittal, if they are a Minority-Owned Business. Five (5) points will be awarded if the firm is certified. Zero (0) points, will be awarded if the firm is not certified.

The following document must be submitted:

A. A copy of the appropriate certification from a recognized Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) certifying agency, such as the National Minority Supplier Development Council (NMSDC) or the Small Business Administration (SBA) for its 8(a) program, or the Florida State Minority Supplier Development Council (FSMSDC) or the Florida Office of Supplier Diversity (OSD).

TOTAL POINTS FOR PROPOSAL I

Points core Notes/Comments Points

EXP U.S. Services Inc

40 40

30 jo 30

20 ? 20

5 5 5

5 () 5

100 q3 l 100

Score I Evaluator's Notes/Comments

Fehr and Peers

Lfo s

D\C, Sc,�t...

r/c:A-µ$, $.� J\- 7 'L

A�»-r" P .AfZJ<.� i QVal�

SP/lA- i,A� e,.n"" E'. VI S I,;,._, �� (Jt,-W

Possible I S I Points core Evaluator's

Notes/Comments

Kimley-Hom and Associates Inc

30 Jo

20 a, 5 �

5 0

100 0\0

�-Slo�� µ5

Q.Jr-/Qc ?�

=.i,"_;:::;- .

I

Possible I I Score Evaluator's Notes/Comments Points

Kittelson and Associates b ois

,?G�rpl_ 01 i",lf; �,;Sf> 11,..,,,�i vo1 vSIA- Tf'- , I ., �• -

Richard Villasenor