25-00001 Appendix D.doc

DOC document 98 KB Posted

Attached to
Sowing and Growing 85, 000 Ponderosa Pine Seedlings
Solicitation number
25-00001
Issued by
Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington

About this file

Appendix D.doc is a government procurement document from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) soliciting bids for seed propagation services. The document details a contract to sow and grow 85,000 Ponderosa Pine seedlings, with seeds previously collected by WDFW from specific locations where the seedlings will ultimately be planted. The solicitation (number 25-00001) was posted on March 20, 2025, with proposal submissions due by May 5, 2025, representing a procurement timeline of approximately six weeks. The project spans multiple Washington State counties, including Franklin, Grant, Grays Harbor, Chelan, and Yakima, and requires a specialized nursery contractor capable of cultivating seedlings while preserving their unique genetic and environmental characteristics.

The procurement appears focused on environmental restoration or habitat reconstruction, with an emphasis on maintaining the seeds' specific ecological adaptations. While the exact budget is not specified, the volume of seedlings suggests a potentially significant contract value. The solicitation prioritizes qualitative factors beyond pricing, particularly the contractor's expertise in precision seed cultivation and understanding of regional ecological conditions. No explicit set-aside designations are detailed, but the specialized nature of the contract implies a need for contractors with extensive botanical and agricultural knowledge, specifically in coniferous tree propagation. The non-replaceability of the seeds underscores the critical nature of selecting a contractor with precise propagation capabilities.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
25-00001 IFB Amend. 1.pdf PDF
25-00001 Appendix C .doc DOC document
25-00001 Amend. 1 .docx DOCX document
25-00001 IFB Ponderosa Pine Seedlings 3.20.25.docx DOCX document
Appendix A- .docx DOCX document
25-00001 Appendix B.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Invitation For Bids (IFB) No. 25-00001 Sowing and Growing 85,000 Ponderosa Pine Seedlings

Appendix D - Complaint, Debrief and Protest Procedure Procurement Complaint Process

Vendors considering submitting a bid or proposal in response to any request for bids, request for qualifications, request for proposals or any solicitation for goods and services under RCW 39.26 may submit complaints regarding a particular solicitation to the WDFW solicitation point of contact. Vendors may submit a complaint on the following for any solicitation:

· The solicitation unnecessarily restricts competition;

· The solicitation evaluation or scoring process is unfair or flawed; or

· The solicitation requirements are inadequate or insufficient to prepare a response.

All complaints submitted under this process must:

· Be in writing;

· Be received by the WDFW solicitation point of contact by e-mail not later than five business days before the vendor’s response to a solicitation is required to be submitted to WDFW.

· Clearly articulate the basis for the complaint; and

· Include a proposed remedy.

WDFW will respond to complaints in writing and post the response (and any changes to the solicitation required by the response) on WEBS. Vendors may not appeal the response or raise the same complaint during any protest period.

Procurement Protest Procedure

RCW 39.26.170 requires WDFW to have a clear and transparent complaint process that allows bidders to submit protests after the announcement of the apparent successful bidder (ASB). The purpose of this process is to allow WDFW to correct evaluation process errors and problems before a contract is executed. After the announcement of the ASB, the WDFW solicitation point of contact must offer a debriefing conference to any bidder upon request. Bidders must request a debriefing conference within three (3) business days after the ASB is announced. In order to submit a protest for a solicitation:

· The bidder must have submitted a response for that solicitation;

· The bidder must have participated in a debriefing conference for that solicitation;

· The protest must be received by the WDFW solicitation point of contact by e-mail or letter within (5) business days after the bidder’s debriefing conference; and

· The protest must be in writing and clearly articulate the basis for the protest.

Bidders may submit a protest on the following issues for a solicitation:

· A matter of bias, discrimination, or conflict of interest on the part of an evaluator;

· Errors in computing the scores; or

· Non-compliance with procedures described in the procurement document or agency protest process.

The WDFW Chief Financial Officer is responsible for investigating and responding to the protest in writing within 10 business days from receipt of the protest, unless additional time is needed. If additional time is needed the WDFW Chief Financial Officer will notify the protesting bidder within 10 business days from receipt of the protest. The WDFW Chief Financial Officer’s decision regarding a protest is final.

Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife

IFB No. 25-00001 – Complaint, Debrief and Protest Procedure (Appendix D)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .