24-00023 Amd 1 Schedule F.pdf

PDF 953 KB Posted

Attached to
Observatory Forest Health Thinning
Solicitation number
24-00023
Issued by
Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington

About this file

This document is a request for quotation (RFQ) from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for the Observatory Forest Health Thinning project. The RFQ seeks responses from harvesters, logging firms, and equipment operators who have been pre-qualified for the DNR's harvester bidding pool to contract harvest and deliver approximately 13,366 tons of timber across 4 units on the Wenas Wildlife Area in Kittitas County, Washington. The project requires responses by a specified closing date, with contract award and project completion to occur within defined timeframes.

The RFQ provides detailed specifications for the timber harvesting work, including information on stream crossings, road profiles, and other site conditions. Pricing terms, funding sources, and other commercial requirements are not explicitly stated, but the RFQ indicates that the selected contractor will be responsible for harvesting and delivering the timber to designated purchasers per the agency's specifications.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
24-00023 OBS Exhibit B Bidder Profile.docx DOCX document
Ex C Maps 1-3.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 12.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 8.pdf PDF
Exhibit H Harvester Bid Form.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 19.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 21.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 7.pdf PDF
Exhibit D Sample Contract.pdf PDF
Exhibit G ARRF Rates (002).pdf PDF
Harvester_Perform_Security_Savings.pdf PDF
OBS Exhibit I road cost bid form.pdf PDF
RFQ 24-00023 OBS Forest Health Thinning 9.3.pdf PDF
24-00023 OBS Exhibit F Road Plan.docx DOCX document
Ex C Maps 15.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 16.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 20.pdf PDF
Exhibit E Road Summary.docx DOCX document
OBS Exhibit A cert assurances.docx DOCX document
Ex C Maps 10-11.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 13.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 14.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 17-18.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 4-6.pdf PDF
Ex C Maps 9.pdf PDF
Harvester_Performance_Bond.docx DOCX document
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

Request for Quotations

RFQ No.: 24-00023

Title: Observatory Forest Health Thinning

Date issued: September 3, 2024

Amendment No: 1

1. The purpose of this amendment is to add

• Schedule "F" to RFQ

All other terms, conditions, and specifications remain unchanged.

Attachments:

Schedule "F"

FLOW�

Notes:

Crossing C5 Crossing Located N 48.056178° W 124.591279°

Sec 29, T17NR17E Channel Bed Width is 7.1' average above influence of ford 5.24% average stream slope Elevations relative to an arbitrary datum.

Ford to be installed between July 1st and September 30th 100cyd of Basalt quarry spalls, 10 yd of stream sim

Umtanum Ford Plan Veiw

CP

Elev. 102.7 I!]

Scale: 1 "=30'

30' 60'

NewBassalt

Road Surface

Umtanum Creek Ford

Drawn By. R. Skerbeck Date: 8/28/2024 Sheet 1 of 3

SCHEDULE F-

01/01/2018 FPHP Checklist – INSTALLING OR REPLACING

FPHP Applicant Checklist – Installing or Replacing Structure in Type S or F Water:

(Letters and numbers [xn] correspond to labels on example plans available on the DNR Website)

Information required for all drawings:

Legible Graphical scale bars [B1] Title block for each page to include:

Drawing title [B5] Landowner name [B10] Drawing date and revision date [B20,B25] Page number (X of total) [B35] Title block for first page to include:

Section, Township and Range [B15] Latitude and longitude [B30]

Road Profile (Channel Cross Section):

For All Structures, include the following:

Horizontal axis labeled with stations (1+00) or consistent intervals (such as 100’) [D1] Vertical axis labeled with elevations [D5] Road grades in percent slope [D10] Existing ground surface labeled [D20] Location of existing structures [E15] For Pipes, include the following:

Pipe cross section with size labeled [E1] Dimension lines: Countersink, streambed shape including: pipe bed width, thalweg, and banks [E5]

Type, gradation, or material source used to restore streambed [E10]

For Bridges, include the following:

Superstructure (bridge) and substructure

(foundation) [F1,F5] CBW dimension line [F10] Clearance between 100-year flood level and bottom of superstructure [F12] Armor: Location, type, size, toe depth, and slope angles labeled in X horizontal: 1 vertical [F20, F25, F30, F35, F40]

Bottom chord elevations [F60,F65]

Site Plan; including:

North arrow [A1] Channel alignment upstream and downstream 20 x channel bed width (CBW) (min. 150’ up and down) [C5]

Road and stream alignment, including:

[C10] Planned changes with proposed road edges matched to existing edges [C20] Station labels at constant intervals (such as 1+00) or at direction changes (such as 2+56) [C25]

CBW dimensions for bridges [C26] Stream flow direction symbol [C30] Proposed and existing structures with dimensions [C35] Benchmarks and reference points with elevations [C40] Road drainage plan (ditch relief culverts, ditch lining, etc.) [C45]

Channel Profile; including:

Horizontal axis labeled with stations (1+00) or consistent intervals (such as 100’) [G1] Vertical axis labeled with elevations [G5] For pipes: Cut slopes, fill slopes, and rock armor angles labeled in X horizontal: 1 vertical [G10]

Proposed structure and existing structures [G25, G30] Channel profile upstream and downstream

20 x channel bed width (CBW) (min. 150’ up and down) [G40]

Label all channel beds: existing, finished, and expected future regrade [G35,G36,G37]

Finished and expected channel profiles labeled in percent slope [G45,G50]

Station and elevation labels referenced to benchmarks for:

Finished excavation limits and expected future regraded channel bed limits [G55]

For Pipes:

Upstream and downstream inverts [G60,G65] Finished road surface [G80]

24-00023 AMD 1
Amend 1 Replace Exhibit I and F.pdf
24-00023 SCHEDULE F
ford Crossingv2 Plan 8.pdf
5090 ford Crossingv2 Stream Profile 8.pdf
5090 ford Crossingv2 Road Profile 8.pdf
Check list.pdf

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .