Attachment T - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- U. S. Currency Paper Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2031ZA20R00003
About this file
This past performance questionnaire is for a solicitation seeking proposals for the manufacture of U.S. currency paper for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. Offerors are required to send the questionnaire to at least three assessors for references on contracts within the past five years for similar products involving currency or banknote paper. Assessors will validate the offeror's contract information and provide performance ratings in areas such as customer satisfaction, schedule performance, management, quality, cost, and general comments. Proposals for manufacturing U.S. currency paper are due by February 19, 2020. The solicitation number is 2031ZA20R00003 and involves supplying paper to the Bureau of Engraving and Printing's facilities in Washington, D.C. and Fort Worth, Texas.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
2031ZA20R00003 Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions:
· The Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) requests recent past performance. Recent is defined as within the last five (5) years.
· Offeror shall send the questionnaire to at least three (3) Assessors (personnel or organization) who has used or procured currency or banknote paper relevant to BEP’s requirement. Relevant is defined as similar in size, scope, and complexity to the work defined in the Statement of Work.
· Offeror shall complete Section II prior to submitting the questionnaire to Assessor (s).
· The Assessor(s) shall validate/confirm Section II information and complete Sections III and V.
· The Assessor(s), NOT THE OFFEROR, shall email the completed questionnaire to the Contracting Office point of contract no later than the date and time indicated below.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the BEP to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to:Antonio.Sixon@bep.gov and Milagros.Cortes@bep.gov no later than 12:00 PM EASTERN TIME, Wednesday, February 19, 2020.
I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
| Solicitation Number |
| Request for Proposal No. RFP 2031ZA20R00003 |
| Project/Requirement |
| U.S. Currency Paper for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP). |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
III. Assessor information for Integrated Packaging System only
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Manager
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
V. Performance Evaluation
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| N/A |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
The referenced contractor was responsive to the customer’s needs.
The contractor’s personnel were qualified to meet the requirements.
SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE
The contractor’s ability to ensure, to the extent of its responsibility, that all tasks were completed within the requested time frame.
Time required for the vendor to install, startup, commission and train your staff on the equipment to begin full production.
Timeliness in Meeting Milestones and deliverables (if applicable)
MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE/PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
The contractor had a clear understanding of the tasks detailed in the Statement of Work
The contractor’s ability to complete tasks correctly the first time.
The contractor’s ability to resolve problems.
Did the contractor successfully manage its subcontractors?
Was the contractor’s management effective in controlling cost, schedule and performance requirements?
QUALITY
What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance? Were your specifications and expectations met by the contractor?
Quality of the finished product; please note any specific issues.
Conformance to Contract Requirements
Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)
COST
The contractor’s ability to accurately estimate cost.
COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)
INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission
General Comments:
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .