20260316_Attachment_3_Past_Performance.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Branded Merchandise Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911SD26QA036
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor performance on federal contracts. The form captures comprehensive information across five main sections: contract identification (contractor name, UEI, contract number, type, competitiveness, period of performance, and initial versus final contract costs); customer or agency identification (agency name, description, and geographic scope of services); evaluator identification (evaluator name, title, contact information, and tenure on the contract); evaluation ratings using a four-point scale (Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Applicable); and a narrative summary section requesting discussion of any marginal or unsatisfactory ratings, termination history, and overall assessment of future suitability.
The evaluation criteria span ten technical performance areas (quality of operations, testing, data preparation, quality control, and environmental safety), nine program management areas (contract management effectiveness, cooperation, problem resolution, compliance with objectives, emergency response, subcontractor quality, material and acquisition management, cost-saving initiatives, and process improvements), two transition and phase-in areas (resource transition and continuity of mission support), three employee retention and attraction areas (workforce qualification, retention, and compensation effectiveness), and two small and disadvantaged business participation areas (meeting goals and technical performance management). Completed questionnaires should be returned to Lakenia M. Brown at the mailing address provided (681 Rogers Place, Room 104, West Point, NY 10996).
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 20260324_Revised_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf | ||
| 20260324_Revised_Attachment_A.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation Amendment W911SD26QA0360002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment W911SD26QA0360001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| 20260316_Attachment_2_Specific_Relevant_Contracts.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20260317_Attachment_A.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 20251218_Performance_Work_Statement_.pdf | ||
| 20251203_Wage_Determination_15-4159.txt | TXT text file | |
| Solicitation - W911SD26QA036.pdf | ||
| 20260316_Attachment_1_Consent.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire
Section 1: Contract Identification
a. Contractor: ___________________________________________________________
b. UEI: ____________________________________________________________
c. Contract Number: ______________________________________________________
d. Contract type: ______________________________________________________
e. Was this a competitive contract? Yes ________________ No____________________
f. Period of performance: __________________________________________________
g. Initial contract cost: $____________________________________________________
h. Current/final contract cost: $______________________________________________ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ________
J. Description of service provided: ___________________________________________
Section 2: Customer Or Agency Identification
a. Customer or agency name: _____________________________________________
b. Customer or agency description (if applicable):______________________________
c. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands: _______________________________________________________
Section 3: Evaluator Identification
a. Evaluator's name: _____________________________________________________
b. Evaluator's title: _______________________________________________________
c. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ____________________________________________
d. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _________________________
Section 4: Evaluation Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE | PERFORMANCE LEVEL | |
| S | SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. | |
| M | MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. | |
| US | UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. | |
| NA | NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. |
| Technical Performance |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
T1. Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
T3. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
T4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5. Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
| Program Management |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
| Transition/Phase – In |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
| Employee Retention/Attraction |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
| Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| NA |
S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.
S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes ____ Default ____ Convenience____ Pending Terminations____ No _____
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
Section 5: Narrative Summary Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
| ________________________ | _______________________ | |
| Evaluator’s Signature | Date |
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address:
Lakenia Brown 681 Rogers Pl., Rm 104 West Point, NY 10996 845-938-8182 Lakenia.m.brown.civ@army.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .