2026-005_Pricing_Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- City Sidewalk Project
- Solicitation number
- 2026-005
- Issued by
- Alachua County, Graceville City, Florida
About this file
This is a pricing form for a state and local contract opportunity involving asphalt and concrete services across multiple jurisdictions in Florida, including Mt. San Antonio College (Mt. SAC) in California, the City of Newark, New Jersey, and the Gainesville Regional Utilities (GRU) in Florida. The pricing schedule requests line-item bids for comprehensive pavement and surface restoration services including SuperPave asphalt applications at varying thicknesses (up to 2 inches and incremental increases above 2 inches), asphalt prime and tack coats, concrete sidewalks at 4-inch, 6-inch, and 8-inch thicknesses, concrete sidewalk ramps with detectable warning systems, FDOT-compliant curbing and gutter systems, brick pavers for both traffic-bearing and non-traffic-bearing locations, pavement striping and thermoplastic markings, demolition services for concrete, asphalt, and brick pavers, and temporary traffic control services. The estimated annual quantities range significantly across bid items, with asphalt applications totaling approximately 30,000 to 50,000 square feet, concrete sidewalk work estimated at 4,000 to 4,500 square feet depending on thickness, and striping and marking work totaling 12,000 to 13,000 linear feet. The City of Newark, New Jersey deadline for bid submission is 10:15 am on Thursday, February 26, 2026, with electronic bids only accepted through the City's e-Procurement Portal and ProcureNow system.
Respondents must provide unit pricing for all bid items categorized by quantity thresholds (under 2,500 square feet, 2,500 square feet or greater, and 200 square feet variations for concrete sidewalk work) to establish total estimated annual values and support contract cost evaluation. The form requires bidders to complete all line items to be considered responsive and qualified; incomplete bids will not be accepted. Pricing considerations include tiered unit rates based on volume thresholds, with the contractor furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary for project completion. The contract evaluation methodology utilizes a best value procurement approach weighing experience and qualifications (20%), service methodology and compliance (25%), pricing (30%), and proposal quality (25%). The contract term is estimated at five years with potential annual price adjustments indexed to the LA/Riverside Consumer Price Index. Additional requirements include compliance with prevailing wage laws, drug-free workplace certification, performance and payment bonds covering 100 percent of contract price for agreements exceeding $25,000, and maintenance of workers' compensation, commercial general liability, and automobile liability insurance.
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| ATTACHMENT A |
| PRICING SCHEDULE |
| Vendor Name: _____________________________________________________________________________ |
| Bid Item | Description | QTY | Unit Price | Unit | Unit Price | Total Estimated Annual Value Qty ≤ 2,500 SF | Total Estimated Annual Value Qty> 2,500 SF | |
| A | SuperPave Asphalt | Estimated Annual Qty's | Qty ≤ 100 SF | Qty ≤ 2,500 SF | Qty > 2,500 SF | |||
| A.1 | SP 12.5, Up to 2" Thickness | 30,000 | SF | |||||
| A.2 | SP 12.5, Additional 1" incremental increase in thickness above 2" thick | 50,000 | SF | |||||
| B | Asphalt Prime or Tack Coats | Qty ≤ 2,500 SF | Qty > 2,500 SF | |||||
| B.1 | Prime Coat | 20,000 | SF | |||||
| B.2 | Tack Coat | 35,000 | SF | |||||
| C | Concrete Sidewalk | Qty ≤ 200 SF | Qty > 200 SF | |||||
| C.1 | Concrete Sidewalk, Driveways and Turnouts, 4-inch Thickness | 4,000 | SF | |||||
| C.2 | Concrete Sidewalk, Driveways and Turnouts, 6-inch Thickness | 4,500 | SF | |||||
| C.3 | Concrete Sidewalk, Driveways and Turnouts, 8-inch Thickness | 300 | SF | |||||
| D | Concrete Sidewalk Ramps with Detectable Warnings | Per Unit | $/ Unit | N/A | ||||
| D.1 | Sidewalk Ramp with Detectable Warning Mats | N/A | ||||||
| D.1a | Ramp width less than or equal to 6-feet | 2 | EA | N/A | ||||
| D.1b | Ramp width greater than 6-feet | 2 | EA | N/A | ||||
| D.2 | Sidewalk Ramp with Detectable Warning Brick Pavers | N/A | ||||||
| D.2a | Ramp width less than or equal to 6-feet | 2 | EA | N/A | ||||
| D.2b | Ramp width greater than 6-feet | 2 | EA | N/A | ||||
| F | Concrete Curbing | Qty ≤ 100 LF | Qty > 100 LF | |||||
| E.1 | FDOT Type D Curb | 20 | LF | |||||
| E.2 | FDOT Type F Curb and Gutter | 100 | LF | |||||
| E.3 | FDOT Valley Gutter | 150 | LF | |||||
| G | Brick Pavers | Qty ≤ 200 SF | Qty > 200 SF | |||||
| F.1 | Brick Pavers - Traffic Bearing Locations | 2 | SF | |||||
| F.2 | Brick Pavers - Non-Traffic Bearing Locations | 10 | SF | |||||
| H | Pavement Striping and Markers | Qty ≤ 100 LF | Qty > 100 LF | |||||
| G.1 | Painted Pavement Markings | 12,000 | LF | |||||
| G.2 | Thermoplastic Pavement Markings | 1,000 | LF | |||||
| G.3 | Retroreflective Pavement Markers (RPMs) | 5 | EA | |||||
| I | Demolition | Per Unit | $/ Unit | N/A | ||||
| H.1 | Concrete Demolition | 13,000 | SF | N/A | ||||
| H.2 | Asphalt Demolition | 75,000 | SF | N/A | ||||
| H.3 | Brick Paver Demolition | 1,000 | SF | N/A | ||||
| H.4 | Milling Resurfacing | 25,000 | SF | |||||
| J | Temporary Traffic Control | Per Unit | $/ Unit | N/A | ||||
| I.1 | Two-Lane, Two-Way, Work Within the Travel Way per FDOT Index No. 102-603, Sheet 1 of 3 | 20 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.2 | Two-Lane, Two-Way, Intersection Work per FDOT Index No. 102-604 | 10 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.3 | Multilane Roadway, Lane Closures per FDOT Index No. 102- 613, Sheets 1 of 5, 2 of 5, 3 of 5 | 15 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.4 | Multilane Roadway, Intersection Work per FDOT Index No. 102-615, Sheets 1 of 5, 2 of 5, 3 of 5 | 5 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.5 | Sidewalk Closure per FDOT Index 102-660, Sheet 1 of 2 | 100 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.6 | Bicycle Facility Closures per FDOT Index 102-661, Sheet 1 of 2 | 10 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.7 | Flaggers (2 Flagger min - 4 hours min) | 150 | 1/2 Day | N/A | ||||
| I.8 | Signed and Sealed MOT Plan (Required for all Detours and Lane Closures) | 20 | EA | N/A | ||||
| Total Estimated Value of Scope of Work |
NOTE: Respondents must bid the entire bid form items in order to be considered a responsive and qualified bid.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .