2026-005_Pricing_Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- City Sidewalk Project
- Solicitation number
- 2026-005
- Issued by
- Alachua County, Graceville City, Florida
About this file
This is a pricing schedule form for RFP #2026-005 issued by GRU (likely Gainesville Regional Utilities) in Florida for asphalt and concrete services. The solicitation encompasses a comprehensive scope of pavement restoration work including SuperPave asphalt installation, prime and tack coats, concrete sidewalks and driveways at various thicknesses (4, 6, and 8 inches), concrete sidewalk ramps with detectable warnings, FDOT-compliant curbing, brick pavers for traffic and non-traffic bearing locations, pavement striping and retroreflective markers, demolition services for concrete, asphalt, brick pavers, and milling resurfacing, and temporary traffic control measures. Estimated annual quantities are substantial, ranging from concrete sidewalk work (4,000 to 4,500 square feet) and asphalt paving (30,000 to 50,000 square feet) to demolition work (13,000 to 75,000 square feet) and temporary traffic control services (5 to 100 days). The pricing form requires vendors to submit unit prices and total estimated annual values for all bid items, with tiered pricing thresholds for certain line items based on quantity increments.
Respondents must provide complete pricing for all bid form items to be considered responsive and qualified, indicating a requirement for comprehensive cost proposals across the entire scope of work. The form structure includes provisions for tiered pricing based on annual quantities exceeding specified thresholds (such as 100 square feet, 200 square feet, or 2,500 square feet depending on the service category), allowing GRU to evaluate costs across different project scales. The total estimated value of the scope of work is calculated on the form, providing visibility into the overall contract magnitude. No specific set-asides, incumbent information, funding sources, or contract term details are specified within this pricing schedule document itself, though these elements are addressed in the related RFP documentation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| ATTACHMENT A |
| PRICING SCHEDULE |
| Vendor Name: _____________________________________________________________________________ |
| Bid Item | Description | QTY | Unit Price | Unit | Unit Price | Total Estimated Annual Value Qty ≤ 2,500 SF | Total Estimated Annual Value Qty> 2,500 SF | |
| A | SuperPave Asphalt | Estimated Annual Qty's | Qty ≤ 100 SF | Qty ≤ 2,500 SF | Qty > 2,500 SF | |||
| A.1 | SP 12.5, Up to 2" Thickness | 30,000 | SF | |||||
| A.2 | SP 12.5, Additional 1" incremental increase in thickness above 2" thick | 50,000 | SF | |||||
| B | Asphalt Prime or Tack Coats | Qty ≤ 2,500 SF | Qty > 2,500 SF | |||||
| B.1 | Prime Coat | 20,000 | SF | |||||
| B.2 | Tack Coat | 35,000 | SF | |||||
| C | Concrete Sidewalk | Qty ≤ 200 SF | Qty > 200 SF | |||||
| C.1 | Concrete Sidewalk, Driveways and Turnouts, 4-inch Thickness | 4,000 | SF | |||||
| C.2 | Concrete Sidewalk, Driveways and Turnouts, 6-inch Thickness | 4,500 | SF | |||||
| C.3 | Concrete Sidewalk, Driveways and Turnouts, 8-inch Thickness | 300 | SF | |||||
| D | Concrete Sidewalk Ramps with Detectable Warnings | Per Unit | $/ Unit | N/A | ||||
| D.1 | Sidewalk Ramp with Detectable Warning Mats | N/A | ||||||
| D.1a | Ramp width less than or equal to 6-feet | 2 | EA | N/A | ||||
| D.1b | Ramp width greater than 6-feet | 2 | EA | N/A | ||||
| D.2 | Sidewalk Ramp with Detectable Warning Brick Pavers | N/A | ||||||
| D.2a | Ramp width less than or equal to 6-feet | 2 | EA | N/A | ||||
| D.2b | Ramp width greater than 6-feet | 2 | EA | N/A | ||||
| F | Concrete Curbing | Qty ≤ 100 LF | Qty > 100 LF | |||||
| E.1 | FDOT Type D Curb | 20 | LF | |||||
| E.2 | FDOT Type F Curb and Gutter | 100 | LF | |||||
| E.3 | FDOT Valley Gutter | 150 | LF | |||||
| G | Brick Pavers | Qty ≤ 200 SF | Qty > 200 SF | |||||
| F.1 | Brick Pavers - Traffic Bearing Locations | 2 | SF | |||||
| F.2 | Brick Pavers - Non-Traffic Bearing Locations | 10 | SF | |||||
| H | Pavement Striping and Markers | Qty ≤ 100 LF | Qty > 100 LF | |||||
| G.1 | Painted Pavement Markings | 12,000 | LF | |||||
| G.2 | Thermoplastic Pavement Markings | 1,000 | LF | |||||
| G.3 | Retroreflective Pavement Markers (RPMs) | 5 | EA | |||||
| I | Demolition | Per Unit | $/ Unit | N/A | ||||
| H.1 | Concrete Demolition | 13,000 | SF | N/A | ||||
| H.2 | Asphalt Demolition | 75,000 | SF | N/A | ||||
| H.3 | Brick Paver Demolition | 1,000 | SF | N/A | ||||
| H.4 | Milling Resurfacing | 25,000 | SF | |||||
| J | Temporary Traffic Control | Per Unit | $/ Unit | N/A | ||||
| I.1 | Two-Lane, Two-Way, Work Within the Travel Way per FDOT Index No. 102-603, Sheet 1 of 3 | 20 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.2 | Two-Lane, Two-Way, Intersection Work per FDOT Index No. 102-604 | 10 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.3 | Multilane Roadway, Lane Closures per FDOT Index No. 102- 613, Sheets 1 of 5, 2 of 5, 3 of 5 | 15 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.4 | Multilane Roadway, Intersection Work per FDOT Index No. 102-615, Sheets 1 of 5, 2 of 5, 3 of 5 | 5 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.5 | Sidewalk Closure per FDOT Index 102-660, Sheet 1 of 2 | 100 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.6 | Bicycle Facility Closures per FDOT Index 102-661, Sheet 1 of 2 | 10 | DAY | N/A | ||||
| I.7 | Flaggers (2 Flagger min - 4 hours min) | 150 | 1/2 Day | N/A | ||||
| I.8 | Signed and Sealed MOT Plan (Required for all Detours and Lane Closures) | 20 | EA | N/A | ||||
| Total Estimated Value of Scope of Work |
NOTE: Respondents must bid the entire bid form items in order to be considered a responsive and qualified bid.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .