2019 Montague Plains Bee Study _Bove Evaluation.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DFW-2019-031 Bee Surveys Montague Plains
- Solicitation number
- BD-19-1046-DFW-FW104-36294
- Issued by
- Franklin County, New Bedford City, Massachusetts
About this file
This document contains an evaluation form for proposals submitted for the 2019 Montague Plains Bee Study, which was conducted by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (DFW). The evaluation form assesses the completeness of the proposals, the contractor's experience with similar projects in Massachusetts, the adequacy of the proposed project scope and methods, the understandability and completeness of the budget, and whether the total cost meets DFW's expectations. The evaluation was conducted by two reviewers, Joan Milam and Daniel Bove, a Restoration Ecologist, with the proposals receiving total scores of 50 and 45 points, respectively.
The related state and local contract opportunity is titled "DFW-2019-031 Bee Surveys Montague Plains" and is described as the DFW seeking proposals to sample bee populations throughout the active 2019 bee season at the Montague Plains Wildlife Management Area located in Montague, Massachusetts, which is in Franklin County.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Joan Milam Evaluation Form for Proposals Montaguie Plains Bee Study 2019
Evaluation Criteria : Joan Milam Score
| Is the proposal complete? Are all the required sections included? | 10 |
| (Complete = 10 pts; Missing 1 section = 5 pts; Missing more than 1 section = 0 pts) |
| Is the proposed contractor adequately experienced in similar projects in Massachusetts? | 10 |
| Extensive documented experience = 10 pts; Some documented experience = 5 pts; No demonstarted experience = 0 pts) |
| Are the project scope and methods adequate / will DFW meet our project goals? | 10 |
| (Clear and appropriate = 10 pts; Vague or questionable = 5 pts; Incomplete = 0 pts) |
| Is the budget understandable and complete? | 10 |
| (Complete, no questions remaining = 10 pts; Questions remain but low significance = 5 pts; | |
| Incomplete, substantial questions remain = 0 pts) |
| Does the total cost for the proposed products meet our expectations? | 10 |
| (Meets or exceeds = 10 pts; Cost higher than expectations = 5 pts; Cost prohibitive = 0 pts) |
Total Point Score 50
Reviewer: Daniel Bove
| Title: Restoration Ecologist |
| Date: 3/25/2019 |
VHB
Evaluation Form for Proposals Montaguie Plains Bee Study 2019
Evaluation Criteria : VHB Score
| Is the proposal complete? Are all the required sections included? | 10 |
| (Complete = 10 pts; Missing 1 section = 5 pts; Missing more than 1 section = 0 pts) |
| Is the proposed contractor adequately experienced in similar projects in Massachusetts? | 5 |
| Extensive documented experience = 10 pts; Some documented experience = 5 pts; No demonstarted experience = 0 pts) |
| Are the project scope and methods adequate / will DFW meet our project goals? | 10 |
| (Clear and appropriate = 10 pts; Vague or questionable = 5 pts; Incomplete = 0 pts) |
| Is the budget understandable and complete? | 10 |
| (Complete, no questions remaining = 10 pts; Questions remain but low significance = 5 pts; | |
| Incomplete, substantial questions remain = 0 pts) |
| Does the total cost for the proposed products meet our expectations? | 10 |
| (Meets or exceeds = 10 pts; Cost higher than expectations = 5 pts; Cost prohibitive = 0 pts) |
Total Point Score 45
Reviewer: Daniel Bove
| Title: Restoration Ecologist |
| Date: 3/25/2019 |
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .