2019 Montague Plains Bee Study Bid Evaluation Form - Buelow.xls

XLS spreadsheet 31 KB Posted

Attached to
DFW-2019-031 Bee Surveys Montague Plains
Solicitation number
BD-19-1046-DFW-FW104-36294
Issued by
Franklin County, New Bedford City, Massachusetts

About this file

This document is a bid evaluation form for the 2019 Montague Plains Bee Study contract opportunity issued by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. The project seeks proposals to sample bee populations throughout the active 2019 bee season at the Montague Plains Wildlife Management Area in Franklin County, Massachusetts. The evaluation form assesses proposals on criteria such as completeness, contractor experience, adequacy of project scope and methods, budget, and total cost. The bid opportunity ID is DFW-2019-031, and the evaluation was conducted by Senior Restoration Ecologist Chris Buelow on March 20, 2019.

The evaluation form shows that two proposals were received and scored. One proposal received a total score of 50 out of 50 points, while the other received a score of 47 out of 50 points. The form does not provide additional details on the selected contractor or contract award.

View the file

Other files

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Milam

Evaluation Form for Proposals Montaguie Plains Bee Study 2019
Evaluation Criteria :Score
Is the proposal complete? Are all the required sections included?10
(Complete = 10 pts; Missing 1 section = 5 pts; Missing more than 1 section = 0 pts)
Is the proposed contractor adequately experienced in similar projects in Massachusetts?10
Extensive documented experience = 10 pts; Some documented experience = 5 pts; No demonstarted experience = 0 pts)
Are the project scope and methods adequate / will DFW meet our project goals?10
(Clear and appropriate = 10 pts; Vague or questionable = 5 pts; Incomplete = 0 pts)
Is the budget understandable and complete?10
(Complete, no questions remaining = 10 pts; Questions remain but low significance = 5 pts;
Incomplete, substantial questions remain = 0 pts)
Does the total cost for the proposed products meet our expectations?10
(Meets or exceeds = 10 pts; Cost higher than expectations = 5 pts; Cost prohibitive = 0 pts)
Total Point Score50
Reviewer: Chris Buelow
Title: Senior Restoration Ecologist
Date: March 20, 2019

VHB

Evaluation Form for Proposals Montaguie Plains Bee Study 2019
Evaluation Criteria :Score
Is the proposal complete? Are all the required sections included?10
(Complete = 10 pts; Missing 1 section = 5 pts; Missing more than 1 section = 0 pts)
8
Is the proposed contractor adequately experienced in similar projects in Massachusetts?
Extensive documented experience = 10 pts; Some documented experience = 5 pts; No demonstarted experience = 0 pts)
Are the project scope and methods adequate / will DFW meet our project goals?10
(Clear and appropriate = 10 pts; Vague or questionable = 5 pts; Incomplete = 0 pts)
Is the budget understandable and complete?10
(Complete, no questions remaining = 10 pts; Questions remain but low significance = 5 pts;
Incomplete, substantial questions remain = 0 pts)
Does the total cost for the proposed products meet our expectations?9
(Meets or exceeds = 10 pts; Cost higher than expectations = 5 pts; Cost prohibitive = 0 pts)
Total Point Score47
Reviewer: Chris Buelow
Title: Senior Restoration Ecologist
Date: March 20, 2019

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .