J.04 Task Order Evaluation Form.pdf

PDF 69 KB Posted

Attached to
Technical and Management Support for Health Promotion Activities 2008 (TAMS 2008)
Solicitation number
2008-N-09699
Issued by

About this file

Attachment J.04 Task Order Evaluation

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
amendment 2.pdf PDF
Systemdoc_2007_appx_NPCRCSS.pdf PDF
NPCR att_06_DataSecu_2008.pdf PDF
B C Papare.pdf PDF
SystemDoc_2007_main_NPCRCSS.pdf PDF
SSb_Ekwueme et al .pdf PDF
Questions and Answers Posted Solicitation.doc DOC document
Attachment_A.pdf PDF
Attachment_C.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 Complete.pdf PDF
Attachment_D.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_Submiss.pdf PDF
J.07 Task Order 1 .doc DOC document
RFP TAMS 2008 Full and Open Solicitation.doc DOC document
J.05 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.doc DOC document
J.10 Section 508 Annual Report.doc DOC document
J.03 NIH Contractor Performance report.pdf PDF
J.06 Non-disclosure Agreement.doc DOC document
J.01 Billing Instructions for Negotiated cost-type contracts.doc DOC document
J.09 Task Order 3 .doc DOC document
J.02 SF3881 ACH Vendor.pdf PDF
J.11 VPAT Instructions.doc DOC document
J.08 Task Order 2 .doc DOC document
QandAPostedwithSynopsisMarch18.doc DOC document
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Contractor Evaluation Form

Contractor Performance Evaluation Report This form is to be completed by the Technical Monitor (TM) annually.

If the project exceeds12 months, than evaluations will be done annually and at the end of the performance period. Completed evaluations are to be forwarded to Project Officer and Contracting Officer for review.

1. Contract Number 2. TO Number 3. TO Title

4. TO Award Date 5. TO Completion Date 6. Total Cost 7. TO Type: ____T&M ___FFP

___CPFF

8. A. Prime Contractor

B. Principal Subcontractor(s) (List the prime’s subcontractors that worked on the this TO)

Technical Performance

Factors/Ratings High (4)

Good (3)

Moderate (2)

Low (1)

Not Applicable

(N/A)

1. Completion of major tasks/milestones/ deliverables on schedule.

2. Responsiveness to changes in technical direction.

3. Ability to identify risk factors and alternatives for alleviating risk.

4. Ability to identify and solve problems expeditiously.

5. Ability to employ standard tools/methods (e.g.

standards, commercial products, info. engineering tools.)

Management Performance

(4)

Good (3)

Moderate (2)

Low (1)

Not Applicable

(N/A)

6. Overall communication with the Government.

7. Effectiveness and reliability of Contractor’s Key Personnel.

8. Ability to recruit and maintain qualified personnel.

9. Ability to manage multiple and diverse projects/tasks from planning through execution.

10. Ability to effectively manage subcontractors.

11. Ability to meet goals for use of Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Woman Owned Small Business subcontractors.

(4) Good (3)

Moderate (2)

Low (1)

Not Applicable

(N/A)

12. Ability to accurately estimate and control costs to complete tasks.

13. Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring.

14. Use of management tools (e.g. cost/schedule, tasks management tools).

Customer Satisfaction

(4)

Good (3)

Moderate (2)

Low (1)

Not Applicable

(N/A)

15. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall technical performance on this contract/order?

16. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall management performance on this contract/order?

17. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to be cooperative, business-like and concerned with the interests of the customer?

9. Additional Comments:

10. Would you use contractor again? ____Y ____N (Please Explain)

11. List the Major Technical Deliverables delivered during this TO:

Title Description Date Due

Date Rec’d

Date Eval Submitted

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

12. TM Name

13. TM Signature 14. Date

15. PO Name

16. PO Signature 17. Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .