2-SLCI27007 Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.pdf
PDF 178 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SLCI27007
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a scoring sheet for Salt Lake City's Request for Proposal SLCI27007 for drone light shows intended for city-wide usage. The document provides the evaluation framework that will be used to assess and score proposals submitted by bidders. The scoring sheet establishes the criteria and point allocations that Salt Lake City will apply when reviewing and comparing responses from potential vendors seeking to provide drone light show services.
The scoring sheet establishes weighted evaluation categories that will guide the selection process for the winning bidder. The specific point values, evaluation criteria, and scoring methodology are detailed within the document to ensure a transparent and consistent evaluation of all submitted proposals. This standardized scoring approach allows Salt Lake City to objectively assess each bidder's qualifications, proposed services, pricing, and other relevant factors in accordance with the RFP requirements for drone light show services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4-SLCI27007 Attachment 1 - Sample Agreement.pdf | ||
| 1-SLCI27007 Attachment 3 - Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 6-SLCI27007 RFP.pdf | ||
| 5-SLCI27007 Attachment 2 - Scope of Work.pdf | ||
| 3-SLCI27007 Attachment 5 - Claim of Business Confidentiality.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or ca 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RF 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in s 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria describ
RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 VII. a.
2 VII. b.
3 VII. c.
4 VII. d.
5 VII. e.
RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
Minimum Required
1 VII. b. i. 20 22.2% 100.0 0.0 2 VII. b. ii. 30 33.3% 150.0 0.0 3 VII. b. iii. 25 27.8% 125.0 0.0 4 VII. b. iv. 15 16.7% 75.0 0.0
100.0% 450.0 0.0 0.0
RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5)
Available Points
Possible Points Points Earned
1 Attachment 1 IV.C.1 1.25% 5.63 0.00 2 Attachment 1 IV.C.2 1.25% 5.63 0.00 3 Attachment 1 IV.C.4 1.25% 5.63 0.00
5.00% 16.88 0.00
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 466.88 0.00
RFP Section Min Percent Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned Evaluation
70% 326.8 0.0 0.0%
RFP Section Low Cost Option
Offered Cost
Percent of Total Points Possible Points Earned
30% 200.1 0.0
Percent of Total Points
Possible Points Earned
70% 466.9 0.0 30% 200.1 0.0
100% 667.0 0.0
DRONE LIGHT SHOW
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
SOLICITATION # SLCI27007
City's Ethics Requirements
City's Gen AI Policy
Certified Experience Secondary Award Agreement Operational Requirements
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Required Technical Point Threshold
Cost
Qualifications
Examples and Service Catalogue
Local Small Business Policy Criteria Total
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Risks
Statement of Approach
Total Technical Points
Sustainability Disadvantaged business enterprise
Scorable Technical Criteria Total
Policy Criteria
Total Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .