2- Factor 1 Past Experience Performance of Co.pdf
PDF 121 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PH0824R0012
About this file
This document is a Past Experience and Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity. It contains detailed questions and criteria for evaluating a contractor's past performance on a previous construction project, covering areas such as schedule, budget, quality, teamwork, and safety.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the Ysleta Land Port of Entry Pavement Replacement Repairs Project in El Paso, Texas. The contract, valued between $10 million and $15 million, is set aside for small businesses and will be funded in part by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. The work includes removing and replacing approximately 397,975 square feet of concrete pavement, as well as other related concrete repairs and maintenance. The project is expected to take approximately 364 days to complete, and the contract will be awarded based on a best value source selection process that favors construction materials with low embodied carbon emissions.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GSA Solicitation No. 47PH08240004
Document: C201-SB GC/December 2023 (The Solicitation)
Attachment 2
PAST EXPERIENCE AND PERFORMANCE
OF THE COMPANY QUESTIONNAIRE
FACTOR 1
A. Construction Firm: _________________________________________________
B. Reference Information:
Name:___________________________________________________________
Company:________________________________________________________ Telephone No.:____________________________________________________ Title:____________________________________________________________ ContractNo._______________________________________________________ Location of Contract Performance:____________________________________ Completion Date:__________________________________________________ Estimated price/cost for services:______________________________________ Type of space/building: _____________________________________________ Type of Contract:_________________________________________________
Actual Sq. Ft. In Project: _____________ New Construction_____________
Number of Stories in Bldg: ___________ Renovation___________________
C. Questions: (Some questions may not apply to your contract)
1. What was the actual work performed by the Contractor?
SCHEDULE
1. Did the Contractor complete the project on schedule?
____Completed prior to originally scheduled completion date.
____Completed by original scheduled completion date.
____Completed within agreed to extended completion date.
____Failed to meet project completion date.
____Not applicable or don’t know
2. To what extent did the Contractor adhere to significant milestones during the Preconstruction Phase?
____Consistently improved scheduled milestone dates.
____Exceeded scheduled milestone requirements.
____Typically delivered as scheduled but occasionally missed milestone dates.
____Contractor rarely met scheduled milestone requirements.
____Not applicable or don’t know
3. How responsive was the Contractor in addressing unforeseen /unanticipated conditions?
____Consistently exercised a pro-active approach.
____Demonstrated some initiative in exercising a pro-active approach.
____Rarely demonstrated a pro-active approach.
____Never demonstrated a pro-active approach.
____Not applicable or don’t know
4. How effectively was the official CPM schedule used as a working tool?
____Consistently used to manage including fragnets.
____Used primarily to measure major milestone progress.
____Approached as a contract requirement nuisance.
____Did not submit an acceptable CPM schedule.
____Not applicable or don’t know
BUDGET
1. Did the Contractor complete the project on budget?
____Completed under budget.
____Completed on budget.
____Completed over budget without outstanding claims.
____Completed over budget with outstanding claims.
____Not applicable or don’t know
2. Did the Contractor submit reasonably priced change proposals from Subcontractors?
____Consistently submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.
____Typically submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.
____Submitted fair and reasonably priced proposals some of the time.
____Rarely submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.
____Not applicable or don’t know
3. How did the Contractor manage Contractor and subcontractor claims?
____Resolved without requiring Owner intervention.
____Agreed and resolved through formal or informal ADR process.
____Submitted as a fully articulated well rationalized claim.
____Sponsored subcontractor claim to owner without independent analysis or validation.
QUALITY
1. How well did the Contractor comply with contract requirements?
____Consistently surpassed contract requirements.
____Exceeded contract requirements.
____Met the minimum requirements.
____Did not meet the minimum requirements.
____Not applicable or don’t know
2. Did they conform to standards of good workmanship?
____Consistently surpassed standards.
____Exceeded standards.
____Met the standards.
____Did not meet standards.
____Not applicable or don’t know
3. How well did the Contractor adapt to changing requirements while maintaining a desired level of quality?
____Extremely effective.
____Considerably effective.
____Effective.
____Ineffective.
____Not applicable or don’t know
4. Did Contractor adhere to the Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan?
____Proactive in implementing the Plan.
____Used basically as a general guide.
____Approached as a Contract requirement but not a working tool.
____Not able to produce an acceptable QC/QA Plan.
____Not applicable or don’t know
TEAMWORKING
1. How well did the Contractor work with the Owner, Architect and the other technical advisors?
____Extremely cooperative.
____Very cooperative.
____Generally cooperative.
____Not cooperative.
____Not applicable or don’t know
2. How effective was the Contractor’s on-site management team?
____Extremely effective.
____Very effective.
____Generally effective.
____Ineffective.
3. Is the Contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of project related third party entities (i.e. tenants, other contractors or vendors)?
____Extremely cooperative.
____Very cooperative.
____Generally cooperative.
____Not cooperative.
____Not applicable or don’t know
4. Did the Contractor maintain an excellent project team throughout the duration of the project?
____Maintained the same team throughout the duration of the project.
____Minor adjustments to the support team were made during the project.
____Significant changes to key personnel of the project team were made during the project.
____Contractor maintained no consistency in key personnel during the project.
____Not applicable or don’t know
5. How effective was the Contractor in selecting and managing the Subcontractors?
____Subcontractors were proactive in problem resolution ____Subcontractors generally responded to Contractor’s direction with a positive attitude ____Subcontractors responded to Contractor’s direction with some hesitancy ____Subcontractors responded to Contractor’s direction with some resistance ____Not applicable or don’t know
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
1. How well did the Contractor coordinate the work of the subcontractors?
____Proactive.
____Moderately active.
____Relied primarily on subcontractors coordinating between themselves.
____Provided virtually no direct coordination of work.
____Not applicable or don’t know
2. How well did the Contractor control the quality & timeliness of submittals?
____Completed in accordance with approved schedule.
____Did not always meet the schedule, however, project schedule was not impacted by this.
____Completed with only a few concessions from the Owner.
____Significantly impacted the project schedule and quality.
____Not applicable or don’t know
3. How appropriately did the Contractor utilize the RFI process?
____Primarily used to document resolution of drawing and specification clarifications.
____Primarily used to document a question, if the answer is not immediately apparent.
____Primarily used to pass-through subcontractor questions.
____Primarily used as a mechanism to pursue change orders and claims.
____Not applicable or don’t know
4. How efficiently did the Contractor complete the punchlist and close out the contract?
____Punchlist and Close-out completed within 1 month of substantial completion.
____Punchlist and Close-out completed within 4 months of substantial completion.
____Punchlist and Close-out completed within 1 year of substantial completion.
____Punchlist and Close-out completed later than 1 year after substantial completion.
____Not applicable or don’t know
SAFETY
1. Did the Contractor implement an effective accident prevention program?
____Extremely safety conscious.
____Generally safety conscious.
____Occasionally safety conscious.
____Rarely safety conscious.
____Not applicable or don’t know
2. What was the actual Safety record?
____No actual loss time accidents.
____Minimal minor accidents.
____Minimal actual loss time accidents.
____One or more major loss time accidents.
____Not applicable or don’t know
3. How was the Contractor’s Safety Incentive program received by the workers?
____Virtually all worker enforced construction safety practices.
____Most workers enforced construction safety practices.
____Supervisors were often needed to enforce safety practices.
____Owner had to consistently remind Contractor to enforce safety practices.
____Not applicable or don’t know
GENERAL
1. List the names of the Contractor’s Key Staff and circle their Overall Performance:
Project Manager ________________________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor) Project Superintendent____________________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor) Project Engineer________________________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor) Quality Control Superintendent____________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor)
Project Scheduler_______________________________ (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor)
2. Circle the Contractor’s Overall Performance (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Marginal, Poor)
3. If you had a choice, would you contract with the Contractor again? Why or Why not?
4. Do you know of any other projects performed by this Contractor? Do you have any other comments?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR CLARIFICATIONS:
Evaluator:_______________________________________ Date:________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .