2-ESR Rolling Consultation IronESR.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NC27-109 Iron Fire ESR Arch Survey (WRI 8059)
- Solicitation number
- NC27-109
- Issued by
- Iron County, Utah
About this file
This is an ESR (Environmental Site Review) Rolling Consultation Sheet template issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing for the Iron Fire Archaeological Survey project (NC27-109, WRI 8059) located adjacent to and north of Eureka, Utah. The document provides instructions and examples for documenting archaeological sites discovered during the survey across three consultation sessions. The file establishes standardized data collection procedures requiring site-specific information including site number, type, dimensions, square meters, artifact and feature counts, detailed descriptions, fire effects assessment, condition evaluation, preliminary eligibility determinations, and SHPO (State Historic Preservation Office) concurrence. The contract is issued as an Invitation for Bid (IFB) anticipated to result in a single award to the lowest cost responsive and responsible vendor. Bidders must be on the approved vendor list for archaeology to be considered. No mandatory site visit is required, and vendors must guarantee pricing for the entire project scope.
The rolling consultation format allows for phased documentation and review of archaeological sites as fieldwork progresses, with examples demonstrating proper completion protocols for historic trash scatters, lithic scatters, and structural features such as Navajo hogans. Documentation must include specific details on tools, diagnostic artifacts, and feature components to enable the Fuels Archaeologist to make informed eligibility and treatment determinations. Sites are evaluated for fire effects, condition status (deteriorating, etc.), and National Register eligibility, with all findings subject to SHPO concurrence before implementation of any avoidance or mitigation measures. The template emphasizes that detailed descriptions facilitate project planning and compliance with archaeological resource protection requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 8059_IronFire_APE.zip | ZIP file | |
| 7-Award Memo.pdf | ||
| 5-Att.-A-PO-Terms-and-Conditions..docx | DOCX document | |
| 8059_IronFire_SurveyIntensity.zip | ZIP file | |
| 1-Vendor Prerequisites - IFB Agency.pdf | ||
| 8059_IronFire_SurveyIntensity.kmz | KMZ file | |
| 6-8059 IronESR ScoreSheet MAforArchaeology 20260917.pdf | ||
| 4-8059 IronFireESR SOW MAforArch.pdf | ||
| 8059_IronFire_APE.kmz | KMZ file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Session 1
| Site # | Type of Site | Dimensions (m) | Square Meters | # of Artifacts | # of Features | Description | Fire Effects | Condition | Eligbility (Prelim) | SHPO Concur? | Date | Comments |
| Two examples of how to complete this ESR Rolling Consutlation Sheet have been provided below. Any tools, diagnostic artifacts, and/or feature components should be mentioned outright in the description section. A breif but detailed description will enable the Fuels Archaeologist to make determinations regarding eligibility and treatment actions. | ||||||||||||
| Example Site Number 1 | Historic Trash Scatter | 1X1M | 1X1M | 89 | 1 | Site includes eighty sanitary can fragments and nine hole in top can fragments. The feature consists of a structural footprint with an east facing doorway which may represent a historic period Navajo Hogan. | Direct effect: Supression, dozer line went through northend of site. | Deteriorating | Eligible | Yes | 11/27/05 | site will be avoided during implementation. |
| Example Site Number 2 | Lithic Scatter | 1X1M | 1X1M | 20 | 0 | Consits of a small lithic scatter comrpised of flake chert materials. No tools identified. | Indirect effect: looter piles observed. | Deteriorating | Not Eligible | Yes | 11/27/05 | none |
Session 2
| Site # | Type of Site | Dimensions (m) | Square Meters | # of Artifacts | # of Features | Description | Fire Effects | Condition | Eligbility (Prelim) | SHPO Concur? | Date | Comments |
| Two examples of how to complete this ESR Rolling Consutlation Sheet have been provided below. Any tools, diagnostic artifacts, and/or feature components should be mentioned outright in the description section. A breif but detailed description will enable the Fuels Archaeologist to make determinations regarding eligibility and treatment actions. | ||||||||||||
| Example Site Number 1 | Historic Trash Scatter | 1X1M | 1X1M | 89 | 1 | Site includes eighty sanitary can fragments and nine hole in top can fragments. The feature consists of a structural footprint with an east facing doorway which may represent a historic period Navajo Hogan. | Direct effect: Supression, dozer line went through northend of site. | Deteriorating | Eligible | Yes | 11/27/05 | site will be avoided during implementation. |
| Example Site Number 2 | Lithic Scatter | 1X1M | 1X1M | 20 | 0 | Consits of a small lithic scatter comrpised of flake chert materials. No tools identified. | Indirect effect: looter piles observed. | Deteriorating | Not Eligible | Yes | 11/27/05 | none |
Session 3
| Site # | Type of Site | Dimensions (m) | Square Meters | # of Artifacts | # of Features | Description | Fire Effects | Condition | Eligbility (Prelim) | SHPO Concur? | Date | Comments |
| Two examples of how to complete this ESR Rolling Consutlation Sheet have been provided below. Any tools, diagnostic artifacts, and/or feature components should be mentioned outright in the description section. A breif but detailed description will enable the Fuels Archaeologist to make determinations regarding eligibility and treatment actions. | ||||||||||||
| Example Site Number 1 | Historic Hogan and Artifact Scatter | 1X1M | 1X1M | 89 | 1 | Site includes eighty sanitary can fragments and nine hole in top can fragments. The feature consists of a structural footprint with an east facing doorway which may represent a historic period Navajo Hogan. | Direct effect: Supression, dozer line went through northend of site. | Deteriorating | Eligible | Yes | 11/27/05 | site will be avoided during implementation. |
| Example Site Number 2 | Lithic Scatter | 1X1M | 1X1M | 20 | 0 | Consits of a small lithic scatter comrpised of flake chert materials. No tools identified. | Indirect effect: looter piles observed. | Deteriorating | Not Eligible | Yes | 11/27/05 | none |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .