2. DRAFT SI&T Short Form L-M.docx

Draft Section L and M Summary for AEGIS SI&T Competitive Follow-On

· Section L

Documents None

· Section 3.1 Volume I: Factor 1: Technical Approach

· 3.1.1 Element 1 – Ship Integration and Engineering Activities

· The Offeror shall describe its approach to ensuring operational effectiveness, lifecycle, and US Navy shipbuilding and overhaul standards.

· 3.1.2 Element 2 – Waterfront Integration and Test

· The Offeror shall provide details to demonstrate the application of the stage testing approach detailed in NAVSEAINST S9095 AD-TRQ-010/TSTP, Total Ship Test Program Manual.

· 3.1.3 Element 3 – Integration Engineering

· The Offeror will study, investigate, and resolve in-service and new construction issues related to the physical integration of Aegis Combat Systems and its components, and manage the lifecycle engineering for SI&T including areas of topside design, cabling, power, cooling, alignment and environmental qualifications.

· 3.1.4 Element 4 – Test Facilities and Equipment for Integration and Test

· The Offeror shall identify and describe the proposed use of Contractor-owned and Government-furnished facilities (NOTE - Government facilities include SUPSHIP 574 Washington St in Bath, ME; Multi-Purpose Warehouse in Pascagoula, MS; Naval Base San Diego, 32nd Street, Building 322 in San Diego, CA; Naval Base Norfolk, Building V-29 in Norfolk, VA; AEGIS Ashore Romania and Poland; CSEDS; and SCSC only for engineering, integration, and test.

· 3.1.5 Element 5 – Personnel

· 3.1.5.1 Contract Wide Staffing Plan

· 3.1.5.2 Recommended LOE Labor Mix

· 3.1.5.3 Key Personnel

· 3.1.6 Element 6 – Schedule

· Provide a sample Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) for one new construction ship and one modernization ship to include the products and activities in support of sample milestones.

· 3.1.7 Element 7 – Basis of Estimate

· The BOE shall include an annual hour executive summary by CLIN, performing company, and proposed labor category for every cost-reimbursement Completion CLIN.

· 3.1.8 Element 8 – LOE CLIN Approach

· The Offeror shall demonstrate a sufficient technical approach to meet the LOE requirements under CLINs X001-X008, X017, and X018.

· Section 3.2 Volume II: Factor 2: Sample Problems

· Offeror shall provide details regarding its technical approach for accomplishing the technical challenges presented in the sample problems

· 4 Sample Problems

· Section 3.3 Volume III: Factor 3: Management Approach

· 3.3.1 Element 1 – Management Plan

· The Offeror shall describe the proposed management plan, how it will be implemented, and key features of the management proposal to plan, execute, manage, and support the proposed system.

· 3.3.2 Element 2 – Management Process

· The Offeror shall describe their management processes relative to Cost Control and Efficiency.

· 3.3.3 Element 3 – Subcontractor Management

· The Offeror shall describe their methods used to monitor and report on all aspects of the subcontractor(s) performance (technical, schedule, and cost).

· 3.3.4 Element 4 – Small Business

· The Offeror shall describe how small business concerns will be utilized to fulfill the contract requirements, including the complexity and variety of work that small businesses will accomplish.

· 3.3.5 Element 5 – Cost and Software Data Reporting

· The Government-approved CSDR Plan for the contract, DD-Form 2794 (Attachment J-01) is included in this solicitation.

· 3.3.6 Element 6 – Transition Plan

· Describe a detailed plan of action addressing all required steps that need to be taken to fully assume responsibilities under this task order within 60 days after award.

· 3.4 Volume IV: Factor 4: Past Performance

· Offeror shall demonstrate through its past performance on efforts of similar size, scope, and complexity that the Offeror will be able to perform the requirements outlined in this solicitation.

· 3.5 Volume V: Factor 5: Cost/Price Proposal

· The burden of cost credibility rests with the Offeror to demonstrate the realism of its proposed costs; as such, the Offeror must submit substantiating data for every major cost element it proposes (e.g., direct labor rates and hours, material, fringe rate, overhead rate, G&A rate, subcontract costs, etc.) for all Cost-Reimbursement type CLINs.

· 3.5.1– Total Cost/Price Buildup

· 3.5.2 – CLIN Specific Details

· 3.5.3 – Substantiating Cost Narrative and Cost Information

· 3.6 Volume VI: SF 33/Completed Contract forms

· Section M

· 2.0 Evaluation Factors and Relative Order of Importance

· Factor 1: Technical Approach (Adjectival Rating)

· Factor 2: Sample Problems (Adjectival Rating)

· Factor 3: Management Approach (Adjectival Rating)

· Factor 4: Past Performance (Acceptable/Unacceptable)

· Factor 5: Total Evaluated Cost/Price (Completeness, Materially Balanced, Reasonableness)

· Factors 1-4, when combined, are significantly more important than the Total Evaluated Price factor (Factor 5). However, the significance of Total Evaluated Price as an evaluation factor will increase with the degree of equality in overall merit of competing proposals under the non-price factors.

· 3.1 Adjectival Rating Process Table M-1: Adjectival Rating Standards