2. Attachment 2_Past Performance Survey.pdf

PDF 173 KB Posted

Attached to
Munitions Storage Area (MSA) Management and Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA286024R0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Headquarters District Washington

About this file

This document contains a past performance survey template for evaluation of a contractor's performance on a munitions storage and management services contract. The survey collects information on the contractor's management, quality control, problem resolution, cost proposals, cooperation with the government, and overall performance on Contract Number with the Department of the Air Force Headquarters District Washington. Respondents are asked to rate the contractor's performance in various areas on a scale of 1 to 6, and provide explanations for any ratings of 1 or 2. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number FA286024R0001 for Munitions Storage Area Management and Support Services with the Department of the Air Force Headquarters District Washington.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Munitions Storage Area (MSA) Management and Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment FA286024R00010003.pdf PDF
FA286024R0001_QA_Responses.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Amendment - FA286024R00010002.pdf PDF
6. Attachment 6_CBA.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment - FA286024R00010001.pdf PDF
5. Attachment 5_Munitions GFE.pdf PDF
3. Attachment 3_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
4. Attachment 4_Technical Exhibit Library.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA286024R0001.pdf PDF
1. Attachment 1_PWS.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MUNITIONS PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ __________________________ Fax Number: ____________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ____________________

Project Title or Brief Description of Work: ___________________________________________

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ____________________ Dollar Amount: $

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number:_____________________ _____________________________ Email Address:_____________________

C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY

RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5 6

NO CONFIDENCE LITTLE

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SIGNIFICANT

CONFIDENCE

HIGH

CONFIDENCE

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Normal contractor emphasis should preclude any problems.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has significant confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. i

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has high confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.ii

No performance record is identifiable.iii

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER

The contractor:

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

1 2 3 4 5 6

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6

5. Followed approved quality control plan. 1 2 3 4 5 6

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

1 2 3 4 5 6

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. 1 2 3 4 5 6

9. Identified problems as they occurred. 1 2 3 4 5 6

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6

12. Was responsive to contract changes. 1 2 3 4 5 6

13. Provided adequate project supervision. 1 2 3 4 5 6

14. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

1 2 3 4 5 6

15. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 6

16. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

1 2 3 4 5 6

17. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. 1 2 3 4 5 6

18. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? 1 2 3 4 5 6

19. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

20. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

21. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO

Remarks:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .