2-Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.xls

XLS spreadsheet 293 KB Posted

Attached to
Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI27038 Development Services Process Optimization
Solicitation number
SLCI27038
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI27038, issued by the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities Development Services Division. The RFP seeks qualified consultants to conduct an audit of the Division's current permitting, review, and closeout processes with the goal of modernizing and streamlining operations to ensure timely, predictable, consistent, objective, and customer-focused service delivery. The project focuses on interdepartmental coordination, code interpretation clarity, permit processing timeliness, updated procedures, effective customer communication, and removal of unnecessary development review barriers. The contract has a not-to-exceed amount of $250,000.00. No specific response dates, due dates, site visits, bidders' meetings, or award dates are indicated in this scoresheet document.

The evaluation process consists of four stages: Stage 1 assesses minimum mandatory requirements including City ethics compliance, five years of relevant experience, conflict-of-interest statements, and GenAI technology considerations; Stage 2 evaluates technical criteria weighted across qualifications (25%), key personnel (25%), responsiveness (25%), project approach (15%), and project schedule (10%), with policy criteria for sustainability, disadvantaged business enterprise, apprenticeships, and local small business each worth 1.25%; Stage 3 includes interviews weighted at 65.4 points with an 80% minimum threshold; and Stage 4 evaluates cost proposals at 10% of total points using a lowest-price formula. The total possible evaluation points are 947.0, with the technical evaluation comprising 55% (525 points), interviews 35% (327 points), and cost 10% (95 points), requiring an 85% minimum threshold for technical evaluation to advance.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
6-SLCI27038.docx DOCX document
1-Confidential and Proprietary Info Declaration Form - September 2026.pdf PDF
4-Attachment 3 - Cost Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3-Attachment 1 - Terms and Conditions.docx DOCX document
5-Attachment 2 - Scope of Work.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Salt Lake City RFP No. SLCI27038 for Development Services Process Optimization
Attachment 4 - Score Sheet
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Stage 1: Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1City Ethics RequirementSLCI27038
2Offeror certifies that Offeror's proposed team has five (5) years experience or similar experience to the work described in Attachment 2: Scope of Work.SLCI27038
3Include a statement that identifies any conflicts or potential conflict of interest that might arise during the Agreement. If no conflicts are identified or expected, respond with “None”.SLCI27039
4GenAI TechnologySLCI27038
0
Stage 2: Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints

Earned

1QualificationsSLCI2703802525.0%125.00.0
2Key PersonnelSLCI2703802525.0%125.00.0
3ResponsivenessSLCI2703802525.0%125.00.0
4Project ApproachSLCI2703801515.0%75.00.0
5Project ScheduleSLCI2703801010.0%50.00.0
Scorable Technical Criteria Total100.0%500.00.0
Policy CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Available PointsPossible PointsPoints Earned
1SustainabilitySLCI2703801.25%6.250.00
2Disadvantaged business enterpriseSLCI2703801.25%6.250.00
3ApprenticeshipsSLCI2703801.25%6.250.00
4Local Small BusinessSLCI2703801.25%6.250.00
Policy Criteria Total5.00%25.000.00
Possible PointsPoints Earned
Total Technical Points100.00%525.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
SLCI2703885%446.30.00.0%0
Stage 3: InterviewsRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria WeightPoints PossiblePoints Earned
InterviewsSLCI27038065.4327.00.00
Required Interview Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints Earned
SLCI2703880%261.60.0
Stage 4: Cost Proposal EvalutionRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
SLCI27038$0.00$0.0010%95.00.0
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The Offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points55%525.00.0
Total Technical Evaluation Points35%327.00.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points10%95.00.0
Total Evaluation Points100%947.00.0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .