Attachment B- Past Performance.pdf
PDF 197 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ISN/ECC SERVICE IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM23R0140
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation template for assessing a federal contractor's performance on quality, schedule, management, and cost control. It requests ratings and rationales for the contractor's overall performance in these areas as well as ratings and comments on lower-level factors. For example, quality of performance is assessed on conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship. Schedule performance is rated on timeliness of completion, meeting milestones, and submitting deliverables. The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Department of State for an IDIQ contract to provide export control and border security program services including promoting strategic trade controls and building partner capabilities to disrupt proliferation networks.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment B—Past Performance Evaluation
Performance Evaluation
1. Quality of Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Quality of
Performance
Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.
Conformance to
Contract
Requirements
Conformance to
Specifications
Standards of Good
Workmanship
(technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment?
Please explain.
2. Schedule Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?
Please provide rationale for assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.
Schedule
Performance
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Timeliness in
Completion of
Contract/Task
Order Delivery
Timeliness in
Meeting
Milestones
Timeliness in
Submitting
Deliverables
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment?
3. Management Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?
Management
b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.
Management Performance Exceptional Very
Good
Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
MANAGEMENT
RESPONSIVENESS—(timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork and customer satisfaction)
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—
(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)
MANAGEMENT OF
PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment?
4. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?
Cost Control
b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.
COST CONTROL Exceptional Very
Good
Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—
(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)
COST EFFICIENCIES—
(realization of any in accomplishing SOW)
INVOICING—
(accuracy and timeliness of submission)
FORECASTING/MANAGEMEN
T/COST CONTROL
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
VII. General Comments:
Assessor’s Signature Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .