19AQMM20R0088 A-001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE RATING

A1

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04/06/2020

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

LMAQMCODE

OFFICE OF ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT

(A/LM/AQM)

1038 S PATRICK DRIVE

ATTN: INL AIRWING

PATRICK AFB, FL 32925

Renee Alexander

NAME

TEL.

alexanderrk@State.gov

EMAIL

6. ISSUED BY LMAQMCODE

OFFICE OF ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT (A/LM/AQM)

1038 S PATRICK DRIVE

ATTN: INL AIRWING

PATRICK AFB, FL 32925

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

19AQMM20R0088

CONTACT DUNS

CODE FACILITY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, country, state and ZIP Code) (X)

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03/09/2020

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X XThe above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended, Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____copies of the amendment;(b)By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.X

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The offer due date is extended from April 17, 2020 until May 1, 2020 and answers to some of the questions submitted.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Jamie A. Goewey

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED

By (Signature of Contracting Officer)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

04/06/2020

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

19AQMM20R0088

Summary Info Continuation Page

Table of Contents

Section Description Page Number

1 Solicitation/Contract Form A-001 Response to Questions received 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items

Section 1- Solicitation/Contract Form

A-001 Response to Questions received

Questions on Solicitation 19AQMM20R0088 Set One (1) identified as A-001 Government responses are provided below.

Item Question from Vendor Government Answer 1 Could you please help us understand the process for 19AQMM20R0088.

Does the set aside limit this oppor-tunity to businesses of a maximum size? Where by Vendor would be excluded as a previously large com-pany?

This solicitation will be a small business set aside as indicated in the solicitation.

Original Set Aside: Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)

2 1. Request an extension

2. Clarification of the actual due date (website issuance says 13 April), actual solicitation docu-ment states 17 April

3. Request an extension for sub-mittal of the proposal

This request for proposal will be extended from April 17 to May 1, 2020. Block 8 and the website will be updated.

3 There is a reference to section “B” but not section B was included?

Under section 52.212-2 there were two references to section ”B” in this solicitation there was no sec-tion B there was an Attachment 2 CLIN Structure which is what will be evaluated.

3 Can additional questions be submit-ted? Any questions should be sub-mitted to goeweyja@state.gov and alexanderrk@state.gov by April 9th

All Questions and Responses to the questions will be posted on Fed Biz Ops.

A second set of questions and answers will be posted as soon as the Government completes their review.

Section 1- Solicitation/Contract Form

Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items was deleted or updated.

52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items

Evaluation-Commercial Items (Oct 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered as described in detail below, Proposal Evaluation of this soliciation.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.

Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

Additional Evaluation Information

The offeror's proposal will be evaluated to determine whether it meets the requirements described in the solicitation.

1. Basis of Award:

A. The Government will award this Contract in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, using Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Offer (LPTA) process. A single award will be made to that responsible Offeror whose evaluated price totaling all Contract Line Items (CLINS) in attachment 2 CLIN structure of this Solicitation is the lowest and whose proposal meets or exceeds all technical and past performance evaluation criteria (non-cost factors). Offerors are hereby notified that the Government intends to use outside contract-ors to assist in the evaluation of proposals. Those contractors will have access to any and all information contained in the offeror's proposal and will be subject to appropriate conflict of interest, standards of conduct, and confidentiality restrictions.

B. It is the intent of the Government to make an award based on the initial proposal without discussions.

2. Non-Price Evaluation Factors and Evaluation CriteriaTechnical Rating:

The following technical factors and evaluation criteria shall be used:

A. FACTOR 1: Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) or Proven experience on Similar Bell Platforms.

B. FACTOR 2: Accommodates Third Party Installation of approved Phase I Proof of Concept.

C. FACTOR 3: Offers capability for all desired functions in Statement of Work.

D. FACTOR 4: Lightweight and Sustainable.

E. FACTOR 5: Single and Twin-engine Capable Systems.

3. Technical Rating:

Rating Description:

Acceptable: Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

4. Past Performance:

A. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant records of past performance as well as the level of customer satisfaction and compliance with contract requirements in the areas of quality of product/service, adherence to contract schedule, cost control; history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to providing quality products/services. Under this LPTA solicitation process, the comparative assessment in FAR 15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply. Therefore, past performance will be rated on an "acceptable" or "unacceptable" basis. Please provide a minimum of three (3) past performance questionares for consid-eration but not more that five (5).

B. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract's requirements. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the Offeror's Past Performance proposal volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Fed-eral Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting system (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Mangers, Contracting Officers and Fee Determining Officials; The Defense Contract Manage-ment Agency (DCMA) and commercial sources.

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favor-ably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance and will be rates as “Unknown Confidence (Neutral)”.

C. In determining the rating for the past performance evaluation factor, the Government will consider the contracts which the Govern-ment feels are most relevant to the Government’s requirement. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The fist is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired under this solicitation. The second aspect of past performance evaluation is to determine how well the offeror performed on the contracts.

a. Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past five (5) year from the date of issuance of this solicitation/ Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

b. Relevancy Assessment: The government will conduct an evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine how closely the products provided/services performed under those contracts relate to the requirements of this solicitation. Considera-tion will be given to similarity of services. The government will sue the following relevancy definitions when assessing past perform-ance:

Past performance Relevancy considerations--Rating Definition:

Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved comparable scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as this solicita-tion requires.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this soli-citation requires.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this soli-citation requires.

5. Price Evaluation

A. The Government will evaluation price for award purposes by adding the total price for all line items identified on the Contract Line Item Schedule (CLINS) (Price-Schedule), attachment 2 CLIN structure of the solicitation.

B. For award purposes only, all unit prices for “Over and Above” CLINS will be included in price evaluation, but the “Over and Above” CLINS will not be part of the initial award as the required quantity for this cost reimbursable CLIN cannot be determined un-til after contract award and must be negotiated based on the total and type of support required.

C. A cost and/or price analysis shall be conducted based upon the data submitted by the offeror in order to determine that the negoti-ated cost or price is fair and reasonable.

(End of provision)

19AQMM20R0088

Line Item Summary

Solicitation Number:

19AQMM20R0088

Contract Number: Title: Rotary Wing HUMS Date of Solicitation:

04/06/2020

Line Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Cost