16-Evaluation Criteria PNC2131324P1.pdf

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Airport Safety Assessment – North Perry Airport (HWO)

Submit responses to all Evaluation Criteria. Vendors who fail to submit the information and/or documentation required by any Evaluation Criteria by the solicitation’s closing date and time—excluding Reference Forms—may receive no points (if applicable) for the corresponding Evaluation Criteria.

Refer to Instructions to Vendors, Section K, for additional information. Vendors should structure proposal to align in the order of the Evaluation Criteria.

Evaluation Criteria

1. Ability of Professional Personnel Maximum Points

Describe the qualifications (including any licenses or certifications) and relevant experience of Project Manager and all key staff, including Subconsultants/Subcontractors (Project Team) assigned to this Project. Include resumes for each Project Team member.

Relevant experience includes the following:

a) Demonstrated experience analyzing and evaluating airport safety, services, and operations at general aviation airports.

b) Familiarity with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations and Advisory Circulars (Acs), including such areas as pilot certification, aircraft airworthiness, and operational safety.

c) Successful completion and adoption of airport safety assessments or similar scopes at other general aviation airports.

d) Experience applying Safety Management Systems (SMS) principles to identify, assess, and manage operational risks across airport functions and stakeholder groups.

e) Understanding of regulatory frameworks and community compatibility considerations, including noise, land use, and environmental impacts.

f) Demonstrated ability to facilitate public engagement, including organizing and conducting meetings with airport tenants (Exhibit 1), local residents, advisory committees, and neighborhood groups to build trust and foster collaboration.

Provide Project Team’s Organizational Chart, identifying key staff, showing roles and/or position titles, firm name, staff names, and lines of authority.

2. Project Approach Maximum Points Describe the Prime Vendor’s Project approach, including use of Subconsultants/Subcontractors, and completion of all items from the Scope of Work.

Approach should include the following:

a) A clear and systematic approach for identifying and evaluating vulnerabilities related to airport infrastructure, operational procedures, and human factors.

b) Use of relevant data, tools, frameworks, or case studies to benchmark airport and airspace capacity, particularly in relation to surrounding residential and community areas.

c) A thoughtful and inclusive strategy for engaging airport users, tenants, and

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Airport Safety Assessment – North Perry Airport (HWO)

Evaluation Criteria surrounding communities throughout the assessment process.

d) A defined methodology for measuring the success of outreach efforts, communication strategies, and feedback mechanisms to ensure meaningful stakeholder participation.

e) Integration of advanced technologies, procedural enhancement, and training programs to maximize airport safety and operational efficiency.

f) A structured plan for translating assessment findings into clear, practical, and implementable safety recommendations.

3. Past Performance Maximum Points A. Describe Prime Vendor’s experience on projects of similar nature, scope and duration, along with a detailed description of completion, both on time and within budget, for the past five years.

Provide a minimum of three references for projects described. Refer to Vendor Reference Verification Form and submit as instructed (with proposal) or within three business days after County’s request. Only provide references for non-Broward County Board of County Commissioners contracts. For County contracts, the County will review performance evaluations database for previous or current contracts with the County. The County considers references and performance evaluations in the evaluation of Prime Vendor’s past performance.

B. Describe the Project Team’s specific past experience(s) within the last five years in similar projects. Include project description, role of each Project Team member, and whether acted as Prime Vendor or Subconsultant/Subconsultant, project dollar value and project length.

4. Location Maximum Points Refer to Location Certification and submit as instructed. Points shall be allocated as follows based on the Prime Vendor’s selection of one of the five options in the Location Certification Form: Option 1 (0 points); Option 2 (5 points); Option 3 (3 points); Option 4 (points range from 0-5 depending on the composition of the joint venture); and Option 5 (0 points).

5. Pricing Maximum Points Refer to Instructions to Vendors for additional instructions and Bid Table in BPRO to submit as instructed.

Total points awarded for price will be determined by applying the following formula:

(Lowest proposed price/Proposer’s price) x 20 = Price Score

TOTAL POINTS 100

Form Date 9/23/25