Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FBI IDIQ for Architectural, Engineering and Planning (AEP) Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 15F06723R0000013
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire template for use in evaluating offerors for a multiple award indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract solicitation for architectural, engineering and planning services. The solicitation is being conducted by the Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters Division under number 15F06723R0000013. The past performance questionnaire requests information from references about an offeror's performance on previous contracts, including ability to meet requirements, complete tasks on time, quality of work, and overall performance rating. References are asked to assess performance as exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal or unsatisfactory. Completed questionnaires must be submitted to two named contracting specialists by the specified due date.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AE IDIQ Amend I RFI Government Responses.pdf | ||
| Request for Qualifications_Amendment_01.pdf | ||
| AE IDIQ RFI Govt Responses.pdf | ||
| Request for Qualifications.pdf | ||
| Project Description.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is conducting a procurement action for a multiple award IDIQ contract for Architecture, Engineering and Planning services. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference for work performed with your agency under the previous/current contract(s) listed below. Your input on our performance is respectively requested.
Provide Completed Questionnaire to: Elizabeth Mott (contract specialist) at ejoens@fbi.gov Megan Brantley (contract specialist) at mbrantley@fbi.gov
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by AE)
A. Contractor: __________________________________________
B. UEI: ____________________________
C. Contract number: _________________________________
D. Contract type: ____________________________________
1. Period of Performance: _____________________________
1. Initial contract cost: $
1. Current/final contract cost: $
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
1. Description of service provided:
FBI Architectural, Engineering and Planning Services 15F06723R0000013
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: ______________________________________
B. Name of Person Completed Questionnaire: _________________________
C. Title: _______________________________________________________
D. Phone and Email: _____________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATION Please rate the AE Firm utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The following definitions should be used in the assessment.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDED MOST contractual requirements. The work performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDED SOME contractual requirements. The work performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the A/E - Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the A/E - Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MET SOME contractual requirements. The work performance included significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the A/E - Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirements. The work performance included serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the A/E - Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Work performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation or unable to provide an assessment. |
QUESTION 1 - PERFORMANCE: What is your assessment of the A/E’s ability to meet work requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUESTIONS 2 and 3 - TIMELINESS: What is your assessment of the A/E’s ability to complete work tasks on time?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Comments, if any: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUESTION 4 - QUALITY OF WORK: What is your assessment of the A/E’s ability to provide quality work and the overall quality of the project?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Work
Comments, if any: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUESTION 5 - OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE: What is your overall rating of the A/E’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on the contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .