1540-006P - Inspection 2019.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
ND NPS PP 2021(1) Pavement Preservation North Dakota
Solicitation number
69056721R000014
Issued by

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

SQUAW CREEK BRIDGE (CAMPGROUND)

CAMPGROUND ENTRANCE OVER SQUAW CREEK

THEODORE ROOSEVELT NATIONAL PARK

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 1540-006P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 8/20/2019

EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 1540-006P

SQUAW CREEK BRIDGE (CAMPGROUND) INSPECTION DATE: 08/20/2019

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

05 - BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS - NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

9 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 42.0 FT (12.8 M)

2 - CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 40.7 FT (12.4 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 27.0 FT (8.2 M)

4 - PILE BENT CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 26.5 FT (8.1 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

UNKNOWN SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

3- SPECIAL PURPOSE FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

2001 - GABION BASKETS INSTALLED IN FRONT OF ABUTMENTS. 2010 - REPAIRS TO

GABIONS.

LOCATION

THEODORE ROOSEVELT NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: .. .07 (KM PT 0.02)

STATE: .............................. 388 - NORTH DAKOTA LOCATION: .... JUNIPER CAMPGROUND ENTRANCE

ROADFACILITY CARRIED: ......... CAMPGROUND ENTRANCE

FEATURE INTERSECTED: SQUAW CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: Z. Bailey, M. Miller

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Marcus Miller

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 02/27/2020

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete box beam bridge is in good structural condition, and has only minor problems at this time. There are areas of paint failure with minor rusting on the bridge railing, mainly at the post-to-rail welds and the bottom of the posts. In addition, the double yellow centerline striping over the bridge and approaches has faded. Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

Other issues include evidence of water leakage between Beams"A" and "B" and between Beams "H" and "I". Water leakage is also present at the bearing area on the east side of the south abutment. The gabion baskets in front of both abutments have settled, but appear to be functioning as designed. These conditions will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 1540-006P

SQUAW CREEK BRIDGE (CAMPGROUND) INSPECTION DATE : 08/20/2019

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.6

CLEAN AND SPOT PAINT RAILING AS NECESSARY.

1 LS 5000 5000

58.3,222.

RESTRIPE CENTERLINE OVER BRIDGE AND

APPROACHES. 1 LS 2000 2000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 7000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1540-006P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

58.1

58.3

59.2

PRECAST CONCRETE BOX BEAM SUPERSTRUCTURE. TOP SURFACE OF BOX BEAMS FUNCTION AS DECK, WITH ASPHALT

WEARING SURFACE PRESENT.

MINOR HONEYCOMBING ON BOTTOM OF BEAMS "C" AND "D" NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT, AND ON FACE OF BEAM "I".

MINOR SPALL (10" LONG X 6" WIDE X 1/4" DEEP) ON EXTERIOR FACE OF BEAM "A". MINOR POPOUTS ON EXTERIOR FACES OF

BEAMS "A" AND "I".

MODERATE LEAKAGE AND EFFLORESCENCE FROM JOINTS BETWEEN BEAMS "A" AND "B" AND BETWEEN BEAMS "H" AND "I".

MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BEAM "I" AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.

METAL DRAIN FOR BEAM "H" AT MIDSPAN EXHIBITS CORROSION.

58.2 EXPANSION JOINTS HAVE BEEN PAVED OVER. CRACKS OVER JOINTS HAVE BEEN SEALED, BUT ARE NOW PROPAGATING

THROUGH SEALANT.

58.3

222.4

ROUGH FINISH ON ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT APPROACHES AND ON DECK. PAVEMENT DOES NOT EXTEND TO DECK EDGES (2" GAP). 2" DROP OFFS BETWEEN WEARING SURFACE AND ADJACENT BARE DECK ON BOTH SIDES OF BRIDGE.

MINOR TRANSVERSE/DIAGONAL CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT; CRACKS REOPENING THROUGH

SEALANT IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR RUTTING OF WEARING SURFACE.

DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE OVER BRIDGE AND APPROACHES NEARLY FADED AWAY.

58.6 MINOR PAINT FAILURE WITH RUST STAINING ON BOTH RAILS, MAINLY AT RAIL-TO-POST WELDS AND LOWER PORTIONS OF

POSTS. MINOR COLLISION SCRAPES WITH RUST ON WEST RAILING. SEE ALSO 222.9.

58.8 UTILITY LINE ATTACHED TO BEAM "A".

58.10 TREES GROWING AT BOTH SOUTH CORNERS OF BRIDGE.

59.9 SLIGHT CAMBER DIFFERENCE IN BEAM "A" AND BEAM "B".

60.1 1' X 1' CONCRETE PATCH AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

60.3 MINOR DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH AT ENDS OF ABUTMENTS. LEAKAGE ON BOTH CAPS BENEATH JOINTS OF BEAMS "A"

AND "B" AND BEAMS "H" AND "I".

60.9

60.11

ABUTMENT CAPS WERE NOTED AS BEING UNDERMINED WITH EXPOSED STEEL IN PAST REPORTS. HOWEVER, GABION BASKETS

CONSTRUCTED IN 2001 APPEAR TO HAVE STABILIZED THIS CONDITION.

PILES ARE NO LONGER VISIBLE DUE TO ADDITION OF CONCRETE TOPPING ON GABIONS; TOPPING EXTENDS FULL WIDTH OF ABUTMENT. MINOR SETTLEMENT OF GABIONS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS; SOUTH GABIONS APPEAR TO HAVE COLLAPSED AND/OR

SHIFTED. MODERATE TO HEAVY MUD BUILDUP ON TOP AND ALONG TOE OF GABIONS.

60.10 SOUTH ABUTMENT PILE CAP APPEARS TO HAVE ROTATED SLIGHTLY (APPROXIMATELY 1/8") TOWARD NORTH

61.2

61.4

MINOR SLOUGHING OF UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS. SEVERAL SMALL, DEAD TREES ON UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS.

61.6 PARK SERVICE HAS INDICATED THAT BRIDGE OVERTOPPED DURING FLOOD/ICE JAM OF MARCH 1997.

222.4

222.6

BITUMINOUS OVERLAY ON APPROACHES AND BRIDGE. OVERLAY FINISH IS ROUGH. APPROACH PAVEMENT HAS SETTLED APPROXIMATELY 1" AT ENDS OF BRIDGE. PATCH POTHOLES IN PAVEMENT AT NORTH APPROACH.

222.7 UNDERSIZED AND DETERIORATED REFLECTORS AT RAILING ENDS. TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKER PANELS IN PLACE AT BRIDGE

CORNERS

222.9 EMBANKMENT BEARS AGAINST RAILING END POSTS AT ALL FOUR CORNERS OF BRIDGE

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 1540-006P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 38 34 64 58

HS 54 49 90 82

TYPE 3 48 44 80 73

TYPE 3S2 74 67 123 112

TYPE 3-3 93 84 156 142

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 07/01/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1540-006P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: THEODORE ROOSEVELT NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............SQUAW CREEK BRIDGE

(CAMPGROUND)

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........1540-006 P

5 - MIDWEST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 3- SPECIAL PURPOSE

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................NORTH

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... UNKNOWN

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:............................................ 388 - NORTH DAKOTA

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

38053

00000

1 6 8 00000 0

SQUAW CREEK

CAMPGROUND ENTRANCE

1540006P0000000

JUNIPER CAMPGROUND ENTRANCE

ROAD

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

.07 (KM PT: 0.02 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 05 - BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS - MULTI (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40.7 FT ( 12.4 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 42.0 FT ( 12.8 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 4 - PILE BENT A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 4 - PILE BENT B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 2 - CONCRETE PRECAST PANELS

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............54 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:......................TONS ( 49

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............90 TONS ( 81.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 08/09/2017 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: 09/01/1998 (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1540-006P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 47° 35'43.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 26.5 FT ( 8.1 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................103°19 '59 00" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 27.0 FT ( 8.2 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 199 MI ( 199 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............200 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2007 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................500 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 26.5 FT ( 8.1 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2027 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON W RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3 00 FT ( 0 91 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................7 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 7 - COUNTERMEASURES INSTALLED

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 1 - MAINTENANCE

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 0 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... 35 - REHABILITATION - DETERIORATION (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 7000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. 1 - WORK TO BE DONE BY CONTRACT (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 0

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2001 - GABION BASKETS INSTALLED IN FRONT OF ABUTMENTS. 2010 - REPAIRS TO GABIONS.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Marcus Miller Structure Number: 1540006P0000000

Inspection Date: 08/20/2019 Facility Carried: CAMPGROUND ENTRA

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD SCENIC DRIVE

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description PREVIOUSLY SEALED CRACKS ON NORTH END OF WEARING SURFACE HAS REOPENED;

NOTE ALSO FADED DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE STRIPING

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL REOPENED CRACKS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description ASPHALT PATCH AT NORTH APPROACH IN SOUTHBOUND LANE; NOTE VEGETATION

GROWTH.

PHOTO 10

Description COLLISION SCRAPES WITH RUSTING ON WEST RAILING NEAR NORTH END

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT EXTERIOR BEAM, SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE COLLAPSED AND SHIFTED GABION

BASKETS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description EVIDENCE OF LEAKAGE BETWEEN BEAM "H" AND BEAM "I" NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description GRADE DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN BEAMS "A" AND BEAMS "B" NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT;

NOTE LEAKAGE FROM BETWEEN BEAMS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 16

Description REPAIRED SCALING ON BEAM "G" NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 17

Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 18

Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .