1540-004P - Inspection 2019.pdf

CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT

UPPER PADDOCK CREEK CULVERT

SCENIC LOOP DRIVE OVER PADDOCK CREEK

THEODORE ROOSEVELT NATIONAL PARK

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 1540-004P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 8/20/2019

EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 1540-004P

UPPER PADDOCK CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 08/20/2019

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

FOUNDATION:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH:

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF BARRELS:

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING BARREL LENGTH: ............. 47 FT (14.33 M)

21.3 FT (6.5 M) SKEW ANGLE: ................... 15 °

10 FT (3 M) YEAR BUILT:

UNKNOWN YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

2004 - PAVEMENT REPLACED.

LOCATION

THEODORE ROOSEVELT NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 14.40 (KM PT 4.39)

STATE: ................................ 388 - NORTH DAKOTA LOCATION: .... SCENIC LOOP DRIVE MILEPOST 14.40

FACILITY CARRIED: .......... SCENIC LOOP DRIVE

FEATURE INTERSECTED: PADDOCK CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: Z. Bailey, M. Miller

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Marcus Miller

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 02/18/2020

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box culvert is in good condition overall. Problems requiring attention include moderate deterioration of the vertical wingwall expansion joint material; heavy vegetation growth along both headwalls and the wingwalls; and a lack of headwall markers. Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report. Consideration should also be given to installing a guardrail system to further improve motorist safety.

Some cracking of the structural concrete is visible, but this condition is minor and crack repairs are not needed at this time. It should also be noted the wingwalls have settled and rotated approximately 3" away from the fill. This movement appears to have stabilized, but the condition of the wingwalls will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 1540-004P

UPPER PADDOCK CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE : 08/20/2019

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

INSTALL HEADWALL MARKERS AT BOTH APPROACHES.

4 EA 250 1000

62.3,62.4

CUT BACK VEGETATION ALONG HEADWALLS AND

WINGWALLS TO FACILITATE INSPECTION. 1 LS 1000 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 2000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

62.4 CLEAN AND RESEAL VERTICAL JOINTS

BETWEEN BARRELS AND WINGWALLS. 1 LS 5000 5000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS 5000 5000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 10000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

12000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

Consideration should be given to installing a guardrail system to help improve motorist safety.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - CULVERT STRUCTURE NO. 1540-004P(cont'd)

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.2 MINOR EROSION AND SLOUGHING OF CHANNEL BANKS DOWNSTREAM FROM STRUCTURE; AREAS ARE PRESENTLY WELL-

VEGETATED.

61.4

62.5

EXHIBIT APPROXIMATELY 2' OF MUD OVER FLOOR SLAB. UPSTREAM CHANNEL SILTED IN.

VEGETATION GROWTH IN CHANNEL.

62.1

62.3

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF TOP SLAB AT TOP OF CENTER WALL, BOTH SIDES. MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF BARREL CONCRETE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR CRACKING AT JOINT OF TOP SLAB AND SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BARREL. MINOR CRACKING OF HEADWALLS AT CENTER WALL; EFFLORESCENCE FROM CRACKS. MINOR CHIPPING AND SPALLING OF HEADWALL

EDGES.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF CENTER WALL.

62.3

62.4

HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG BOTH HEADWALLS AND EAST WINGWALLS. VEGETATION GROWTH ENCROACHING ON

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AND CORNER OF CULVERT.

62.4 TOP PORTIONS OF WEST WINGWALLS HAVE FRACTURED. VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT FILLER IS EXTRUDING OUT FROM JOINT BETWEEN EAST SIDE WINGWALLS AND HEADWALL; MODERATE DETERIORATION OF FILLER IS EVIDENT. HEAVY VEGETATION

GROWTH ON TOP OF ALL WINGWALLS.

62.7 NORTHWEST WINGWALL ROTATED FORWARD APPROXIMATELY 3" AWAY FROM FILL. NORTHEAST WINGWALL ROTATED AWAY FROM FILL APPROXIMATELY 3". SOUTHEAST WINGWALL ROTATED AWAY FROM FILL APPROXIMATELY 1". SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL ROTATED AWAY FROM FILL APPROXIMATELY 1".

62.10 DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE IS FADING BUT STILL FUNCTIONAL.

222.7 NO HEADWALL MARKERS PRESENT. BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS BENCHMARK AT TOP OF WEST HEADWALL OVER PIER.

"PADDOCK CREEK" SIGNS AT BOTH APPROACHES.

MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACK IN SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT HAVE BEEN SEALED WITH BITUMINOUS

SEALANT.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 1540-004P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 11 10 18 16

HS 20 18 33 30

TYPE 3 17 15 29 26

TYPE 3S2 27 24 46 42

TYPE 3-3 34 31 57 52

DESIGN LOADING: 5 - HS 20

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 04/01/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: EXTERIOR WALL

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1540-004P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: THEODORE ROOSEVELT NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............UPPER PADDOCK CREEK CULVERT

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 2 - CULVERT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........1540-004 P

5 - MIDWEST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................SOUTH

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... UNKNOWN

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........R9B123

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:............................................ 388 - NORTH DAKOTA

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:....................... 01007 BIBB

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:................ 1 6 8 00000 0

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:.......... PADDOCK CREEK

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:...................... SCENIC LOOP DRIVE

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:.............. 1540004P0000000

(9) LOCATION:..................................... SCENIC LOOP DRIVE MILEPOST

14.40

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:..... 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(11) MILE POINT:................................. 14.40 (KM PT: 4.39 )

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:............................................ 3 - ON FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:.......... 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 19 - CULVERT (INCLUDES FRAME CU (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............2 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............10 FT ( 3 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 21.3 FT ( 6.5 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... N - NOT APPLICABLE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................5 - HS 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............20 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:......................TONS ( 18.1

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............33 TONS ( 29.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 08/20/2019 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 3 - LOAD RATING CALCULATION (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1540-004P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 46° 55'55.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................103°25 '55 00" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 24.0 FT ( 7.3 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 30.0 FT ( 9.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 3 0 FT ( 0.9 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 3 0 FT ( 0.9 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............200 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 15 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2013 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................500 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 26 FT ( 7.9 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2033 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON W RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 0 - N/A

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 0 - N/A

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... .00 FT ( 0 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... N (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............N (68) DECK GEOMETRY:......................N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... N (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................7 (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF FOOTIN

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 0 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... 35 - REHABILITATION - DETERIORATION (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. 1 - WORK TO BE DONE BY CONTRACT (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 10000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2004 - PAVEMENT REPLACED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Marcus Miller Structure Number: 1540004P0000000

Inspection Date: 08/20/2019 Facility Carried: SCENIC LOOP DRIVE

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD BOICOURT OVERLOOK

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 6

Description PATCH CRACKING AT SOUTH APPROACH IN NORTHBOUND LANE

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description NORTH BARREL LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS, NORTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 10

Description SPALLING ON WEST EDGE OF NORTH BARREL

PHOTO 11

Description VERTICAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST HEADWALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 12

Description WEST HEADWALL; NOTE VERTICAL CRACK AND EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO 13

Description SOUTHEAST WINGWALL VERTICAL JOINT; NOTE EXTRUSION OF FILLER AND EVIDENCE

OF WINGWALL MOVEMENT

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 14

Description SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE ROTATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH OVER WINGWALL

PHOTO 15

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 16

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL