140R3025R0014_Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 88 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ROCKFALL MITIGATION HOOVER DAM - IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- 140R3025R0014
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for Solicitation 140R3025R0014, a Rockfall Mitigation project at Hoover Dam issued by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. The PPQ is designed to collect detailed performance feedback from previous clients about a contractor's capabilities, with evaluation criteria covering areas such as contract team relationship, corporate management, quality control, schedule adherence, and overall performance.
The questionnaire requires evaluators to rate the contractor on a scale from Outstanding (O) to Unacceptable (U) across multiple performance dimensions, including corporate integrity, cooperative conduct, and ability to meet performance schedules. Evaluators are asked to provide additional comments, indicate whether they would award another contract to the firm, and confirm customer satisfaction. The completed questionnaire must be submitted via email to specific Bureau of Reclamation contacts (bwilliamson@usbr.gov and lgallardo@usbr.gov) by the proposal due date and time, with the document marked as source selection sensitive and not to be released outside government channels.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP 140R3025R0014 – Attachment 5
Rockfall Mitigation Hoover Dam IDIQ
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colorado Basin, is considering the firm listed below. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance.
Past Performance Information:
Name and Address of Firm Being Evaluated:______________________________________
Contract No.:__________________ Type of Contract: _____________________ Project Title:___________________ Date of Award:_________________ Completion Date: _____________________ Location:______________________
Initial Amount:__________________ Final Amount: ________________________ Description:_________________________________________________________________
Evaluator: (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data.)
Name of Evaluator: ______________________________________ Company/Agency Name: ______________________________________ Address: ______________________________________ Phone Number: ______________________________________ Email Address: ______________________________________ Position Held or Function in Relation to Project: ______________________________________
Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
| “O” |
| Outstanding |
| Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “A” |
| Above Average |
| Performance exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “S” |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met the contract requirements. |
| “M” |
| Marginal |
| Performance met the minimum contract requirements but |
Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
| “U” |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements. |
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
***NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS***
Please circle the appropriate rating and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:
| 1. The relationship between the firm and client’s/customer’s contract team: |
| O A S M U |
| 2. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct: |
| O A S M U |
| 3. Quality control: |
| O A S M U |
| 4. Ability to meet the performance schedule: |
| O A S M U |
| 5. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain: |
| Yes No |
6. Would you award another contract to the firm being evaluated? If no, please explain:
Yes No
| 7. Was the customer satisfied with the end product and services? If no, please explain: |
| Yes No |
8. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
Yes No
9. Additional Remarks:
| 10. Overall rating for this firm: |
| O A S M U |
Print Name
Signature of Evaluator Date
The questionnaire should be submitted to the Bureau of Reclamation via email to bwilliamson@usbr.gov and lgallardo@usbr.gov. Please submit no later than the proposal due date and time.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .