Q___A_0002.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Adaptive Reuse of Maurice Stephens House
- Solicitation number
- 140P4222R0019
About this file
This request for proposal concerns the adaptive reuse of the Maurice Stephens House located at Valley Forge National Historical Park. The project involves interior and exterior restoration of the existing structure including mechanical, electrical, and plumbing work along with construction of a new foundation, footings, underground utilities, site work, stonework for a new deck. The government intends to award a single firm-fixed price contract to meet these requirements. This is a total small business set-aside for qualified small businesses with a size standard of $16.5 million. The NAICS code is 238990 and Davis-Bacon wage determination PA20220099 applies. Responses are due in accordance with Sections L and M of the solicitation. A bid guarantee and payment and performance bonds will be required.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P4222R0019_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| E30_SV_sign_in_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P4222R0019_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P4222R0019_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| A04_Final_CD_specifications_02-18-22_0001.pdf | ||
| A04_Rev_M__Stephens_Addendum.doc | DOC document | |
| B08_Solit_Experience_REQD.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_6_Covid_Certification_of_Vaccination.pdf | ||
| B08_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_PastPerf_REQD.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_8_Limitation_on_Subcontracting_Report_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sol_140P4222R0019.pdf | ||
| B03_Wage_Determination_Montg_County.txt | TXT text file | |
| Rev_M__Stephens_Addendum.doc | DOC document | |
| B08_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_General_References.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_1_Product_File_Div_9.zip | ZIP file | |
| Attachment_5_Vaccination_Certification_Notification.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_Product_File_Div_10_to_Div_33.zip | ZIP file | |
| Attachment_1_Product_File_Div_7_to_Div_8.zip | ZIP file | |
| Attachment_1_Product_File_Cover_to_Division_6.zip | ZIP file | |
| Attachment_2_Drawings_rev_8_15.pdf |
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers:
| Q1: | Is this tag, W11 correct, calling for plaster restoration on both sides of the wall? |
| A: | For these knee walls in the attic area, the enclosed side does not require plaster |
| Q2: | Is there any oil in the oil tanks to be removed? If so, who is responsible for the removal? |
| A: | The tanks are full and the contractor will be responsible for removal |
| Q3: | See sheet 92 of 150, W19 calls for plaster restoration on only one side, is this correct? |
| A: | This is not correct. The interior stone wall has plaster on both sides. |
| Q4: | Is this tag W17A correct calling for only one plaster finish? |
| A: | That is correct. The other side is an unfinished utility space |
| Q5: | Is there a specified stone type and finish for the threshold repair/replacements at doors 101.1 and 103.8? |
| A: | These repairs/replacements will be in kind to the existing for type and finish |
| Q6: | I don’t see any flashing details for the new retaining walls included in option D. The masonry spec references a metal drip and flexible flashing, but there is no specification for this material. Should we include a S/S drip edge and flashing at grade? Should there be flashing under the wall cap as well? |
| A: | No, propose as shown in the drawing details |
| Q6: | The spec’d capping stone for the retaining walls is Sahara Grey. Brandywine Quarries only offers this in an irregular flagging pattern. Is this the intent or should the caps be of a more dimensional product, like cut bluestone? |
| A: | The caps should be more of a dimensional, uniform product |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .