B08_-_Attachment_05_-_Vol_I_Exp_Updated_0002.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P2026R0081
About this file
This is a Project Experience Questionnaire template designed for offerors responding to Solicitation 140P2026R0081 for the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve TIMU-335, specifically the Kingsley Plantation Shoreline Seawall Extension project under the Department of the Interior National Park Service. The questionnaire functions as an evaluation tool aligned with the Project Experience subfactor outlined in Section L of the solicitation and requires offerors to document relevant past project performance.
The template instructs offerors to provide detailed information on referenced projects, including project title, location, description, and owner contact details. Offerors must list all contractors (prime and subcontractors) involved in the referenced projects, specifying their roles, trade disciplines, contract prices (original and final), and performance periods (original and final duration in calendar days). The questionnaire then requires seven narrative responses addressing: description of work performed; alignment with Project Experience evaluation elements; explanations for any price and schedule changes; problems encountered and resolution methods; successful means and methods and their applicability to the proposed project; and any additional relevant project information. The template is expandable to multiple pages as needed to adequately address each question and accommodate multiple referenced projects as required by the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2026R0081
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name and SAM UEI # |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .