Sol_140P2026R0013_Amd_0002.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: is not is required copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7.ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

PAGESOF

Contractor

The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers to sign this document and return

Rachel Dyer

See continuation page

NPS, DSC Contracting Services Div 1 Denver Federal Center, Building 50 P.O. Box 25287 Denver CO 80225-0287

DOI, NPS, DSC Contracting Services 1 Denver Federal Center, Building 50 P.O. Box 25287 Denver CO 80225-0287

PDS

PDS

140P2026R0013

01/13/2026

12/10/2025

1 5

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGES

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(B)

UNIT

(D)

UNIT PRICE

(E)

AMOUNT

(F)

OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

ITEM NO.

(A)

QUANTITY

(C)

NSN 7540-01-152-8067

140P2026R0013/0002

THE PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT 00002 IS TO ANSWER

QUESTIONS FOR DEVA CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

QUESTION 1: Could you please provide clarification on the exact number needed?

ANSWER 1: There is no minimum or maximum number of past performance narratives. Past performance narratives for projects that are of similar scope and are more recent will be considered more relevant.

QUESTION 2: Firstly, could you please clarify the cut-off date for the completion of past performance? Specifically, how many years after the completion is considered acceptable?

ANSWER 2: There is no cut-off date for projects described in past performance narratives.

Projects that are more recent will be considered more relevant, however.

QUESTION 3: Secondly, concerning the similar scope and magnitude of projects, is the expected range of $5-10 million a strict requirement, or would any amount exceeding this range also be considered sufficient?

ANSWER 3: The magnitude listed is what the expected range the Government has deemed this project. It's up to the market and the contractor to provide their pricing and then the government evaluates determing fair and reasonable pricing. The government can't tell a contractor how much to propose or what is considered sufficient.

QUESTION 4: Please confirm if there is a required number of projects that must be submitted under Factor 2?

ANSWER 4: There is no minimum number of projects that must be submitted under Factor

2.

QUESTION 5: Please confirm whether contractors will be rated more favorably for submitting more projects under Factor 2.

Continued...

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(B)

UNIT

(D)

UNIT PRICE

(E)

AMOUNT

(F)

OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

ITEM NO.

(A)

QUANTITY

(C)

ANSWER 5: More projects may lead to a more favorable evaluation if projects are of similar scope and are relatively recent (from the last

12 years).

QUESTION 6: Please confirm if there is a requirement regarding when projects submitted under Factor 2 must have been completed.

ANSWER 6: There is no requirement regarding time of project completion. Projects that are relatively recent (from the last 12 years) will be considered more relevant.

QUESTION 7: Please confirm whether projects that are currently underway will be considered relevant under Factor 2.

ANSWER 7: Projects that are currently underway will be considered relevant.

QUESTION 8: As projects that are more relevant to the requirements of this solicitation will be given more weight in the overall past performance rating, please provide the specific evaluation factors the Government will use to determine relevancy of projects under Factor

2.

ANSWER 8: Projects including the following elements will be considered more relevant: (a) significant amounts of roadway excavation, embankment, riprap, or rock excavation; (b) performed in sensitive habitats or in national park or similar settings; (c) project sites with limited space for staging and equipment access.

QUESTION 9: Please confirm whether Final CPARS evaluations may be submitted in lieu of obtaining new Past Performance Questionnaires.

ANSWER 9: No, final CPARS evaluations may not be submitted in lieu of obtaining new Past

Performance Questionnaires. The government pulls CPARS regardless.

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(B)

UNIT

(D)

UNIT PRICE

(E)

AMOUNT

(F)

OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

ITEM NO.

(A)

QUANTITY

(C)

QUESTION 10: Please confirm whether previously completed Past Performance Questionnaires may be submitted in lieu of obtaining new Past

Performance Questionnaires.

ANSWER 10: No, previously completed Past

Performance Questionnaires may not be submitted in lieu of obtaining new Past Performance

Questionnaires.

QUESTION 11: Is construction equipment utilized by the PRIME to complete this project need to be converted to bio-based fluids per the following contract language: 52.223-1

BIOBASED PRODUCT CERTIFICATION MAY 2024

(DEVIATION FEB 2025) AND 52.223-2 REPORTING OF

BIOBASED PRODUCTS UNDER SERVICE AND

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (MAY 2024) (DEVIATION

FEB 2025)

ANSWER 11: Yes, the prime is required to utilize all fluids to be bio based for the use of government work on site.

QUESTION 12: On Volume I, Technical Ability and past performance, is there a page limit, font size, project limitation. Can we use CPARS instead of past performance questionnaire.

ANSWER 12: No, you must use the past performance questionnaire. The government already pulls CPARS aside from the questionnaire.

QUESTION 13: On Volume II, Section K, there are several boxes that are marked in BLUE

Highlight. Does that mean anything, as in do we need to address those boxes specifically, etc.?

ANSWER 13: Yes, if they are applicable to you, you must mark the boxes.

QUESTION 14: In general, Contractors are not required to have state licenses to perform work on federal property. NPS policy generally requires contractors to hold relevant state licenses to meet safety and quality standards.

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(B)

UNIT

(D)

UNIT PRICE

(E)

AMOUNT

(F)

OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

ITEM NO.

(A)

QUANTITY

(C)

This project is located in both Nevada and

California, entirely on federal lands.

Requiring Contractors to hold both Nevada and

California licenses would unnecessarily restrict the pool of bidding Contractors and would provide no benefit to the government, as holding a license in either state would demonstrate adherence to safety and quality standards. Please confirm that it is acceptable for Contractors to hold either a

California or Nevada business license of the appropriate category in order to be eligible for award of this Contract.

ANSWER 14: Contractor licenses from any state are acceptable.

QUESTION 15: Can the proposal due date be extended due to the site visit change?

ANSWER 15: Yes, the last day for questions is

Wednesday January 28, 2026, no later than 9am

Mountain Time. The proposal due date is hereby extended to Wednesday February 4, 2026, no later than 9:00am Mountain Time via email.

Sponsored by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.110