B09_Amendment_01_Questions_and_Answers_0001.pdf
PDF 204 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CHIC 240631 WTP AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P2025R0014
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) amendment for Solicitation 140P2025R0014, a federal contract opportunity to construct a water treatment plant and maintenance building. The Q&A document addresses eight specific questions from potential offerors regarding proposal requirements, focusing on past performance, project experience, Standard Form 330 completion, and bonding capacity. Key clarifications include:
The government provided responses to questions about technical qualifications, specialized experience, and past performance requirements. Notable details include: NPS does not specify a required dollar range for past performance projects, offerors must submit Standard Form 330 for the Architect-Engineer (AE) and General Contractor (GC), and prior experience working together between AE and GC will be rated more favorably. The document indicates that some questions will be answered in future amendments, and one response confirmed that proof of bonding capacity with a minimum of $15 million for a single project is a requirement, though no specific go/no-go list was provided.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B09_Amendment_5_Questions_and_Answers_0005.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P2025R0014_Amd_0005.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P2025R0014_Amd_0004.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P2025R0014_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| B09_Amendment_3_Questions_and_Answers_0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P2025R0014_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| B09_Amendment_2_Questions_and_Answers_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P2025R0014_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment_4_SF330.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment_7_Limitations_on_Subcontracting_Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B08_Attachment_2_POR_Appendices.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P2025R0014.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment_6_General_References.docx | DOCX document | |
| B08_Attachment_5__Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| B08_Attachment_1_CHIC_240631_POR.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment_3_Wage_Determination.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
140P2025R0014
CHIC 240631 CONSTRUCT WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND MAINTENANCE
BUILDING
Question No.
Sheet or
Reference Question Response
Date Answered
Amendment Number
1 Section L
“Each Offeror shall complete and provide the attached Standard Form 330 Part I and II for the AE and GC on the DB team and documentation sufficient to demonstrate the extent of the Offeror’s past experience for at least three (3) but no more than five (5) projects of similar size, scope, and complexity (as further defined in this evaluation factor). Of this group of similar projects, the GC must have served as the prime contractor of at least one project, the AE must have had responsibility for developing the detailed design and construction documents for at least one project, and the AE and GC worked together of at least on project.”
1) Can the government provide any additional context as to what constitutes “similar, size, scope and complexity” when it comes to past performance, including the required dollar range?
Phase I Factor 2 Technical Qualifications and Specialized Experience provides context for size, scope, and complexity for Phase I Factor 3 Past Performance.
NPS does not specify a required dollar range.
8/21/2025 1
2 Section L
2) Can the government provide additional context as to what is meant by the line “…and the AE and GC worked together on at least one project?” Is it the government’s intention that this requirement be restricted to a GC and AE having worked together on a Design Build project of similar size, scope and complexity, whereby the AE was under contract to the GC? Or is it also acceptable if the GC and AE worked together on a Design Bid Build project where the AE was the designer of record for the owner? Or are both scenarios (Design Build and Design Bid Build) acceptable?
"and the AE and GC worked together of at least on project. ” Is changed to "Indicate where the AE and GC have worked together on a project(s). Prior experience working together will be rated more favorably."
This requirement is not restricted to a GC and AE that have previously worked together on Design Build Project.
8/21/2025 1
Do you have a higher quality set of drawings? Then ones we downloaded off of Sam.Gov are pixelated in important areas.
This question will be answered in a future amendment
4 Section L Phase 1, Volume 1, Factor 3 – Due to the recent reduction in force, there is no one remaining to fill out a past performance questionnaire for a relevant experience. Can we submit previously completed and signed questionnaires?
This question will be answered in a future amendment
Question No.
Sheet or
Reference Question Response
Date Answered
Amendment Number
5 Section L
Phase 1, Volume 1, Factor 2, page 77 – I have a few questions about the SF 330 requirements.
Page 77 says the GC is supposed to fill out this form. However, this form is typically for the AE team and even states that it is for Architect-Engineering Qualifications. For example, the list of disciplines on page 5 of the SF 330 mentions a construction manager, but there’s not a code for roles required for this project, such as superintendent and quality control manager. Is there another form that the GC can complete? Or can the GC provide project information / write-ups in the proposal rather than on this form?
The SF 330 requires personnel resumes via page 10 of the form, but Phase 2, Factor 4 also requires key personnel resumes. Do we just fill out the past performance part of the SF330?
This question will be answered in a future amendment
6 Section L The third full paragraph on page 77 states, “Both the prime contractor and the design firm(s) shall each submit no more than five (5) projects.” Just to clarify, is that 5 projects total or 5 projects each?
This question will be answered in a future amendment
7 Section L
Page 77 states, “The Offer may provide a supplemental narrative (not project lists) not to exceed two (2) pages, explaining how any corporate experience that is not directly related to the specific projects above is applicable to this project and how the Government will benefit.”
Is that per project or total for all 3-5 projects?
This question will be answered in a future amendment
8 Section L Page 78 says, “Submit proof of bonding capacity with a minimum of $15 million for a single project. Proof of bonding capacity is a go/no-go factor under Phase 1.” I don’t see a go/no-go list anywhere else.
There is no list 8/21/2025 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .